Page 39 of 64

Posted: Sat Jan 14, 2017 8:48 pm
by MathBlade
May all heels be lynched or killed.

The Apex Predator

Posted: Sat Jan 14, 2017 8:50 pm
by Pepchoninga
In post 834, DodgeTheSaint wrote:I guess KMD, Re: my confidence in certain players over others...more things for you (or others to consider). I've completely lost faith in Chara via the non-game reasoning for them to 'lose confidence in my townread'. If they were confirmed town to me it would just simply be a confidence loser in me. Since they aren't it just tips them towards the scum side of things. Even though I read Math as town (for other reasons) while I have very little confidence in his ability to make reads, it's a little different as he stuck himself in a confirm bias spiral at that point. It's almost excusable, where as coming from Almost Chara they have no excuse for it. I'd like to move them to a scumread based on that along, but I fear I'd be putting myself in a confirm bias spiral by doing it, hence why I asked you that question out of nowhere.

I still think Nero is scum, but if you believe Chara to be town then I can understand believing that Nero is town. All this does for me is make a CharaTown and NeroScum distribution impossible (with the other three still on the table). This observation helps me for interaction purposes.

I think that's all I have for those three slots. We're still on opposite sides on McMenno right? Truth be told my read on them is eroding, because it would just be easier for McMenno to sit back and sheep Nero this day phase, and is honestly what I would have expected by this point. Plus at some point there needs to be more here than a Page 1 play.
I'm interested in hearing why you TR math.

Posted: Sat Jan 14, 2017 8:51 pm
by Pepchoninga
In post 880, Almost Chara wrote:
In post 858, Lil Uzi Vert wrote:I believe the claim so I see no reason to break up the masons.
Also, reading this again I see you see it my way. Doesn't that give you a pose or an urge for second thoughts?

I mean, Scum!Me would certainly want to execute the Masons, and we have even been provided with "an out" to do it. I we're Scum them it's likely the Masons aren't really Masons. so, why do you choose to believe they are indeed Masons while simultaneously being suspicious of our slot?

~A50
I don't like this post. Seems to me, like it's just a way to manipulate the other players into an ultimate misslynch/bad decisions.

Posted: Sat Jan 14, 2017 8:53 pm
by Pepchoninga
In post 885, DodgeTheSaint wrote:Why does AC know that mafia on this brand would know who the mafia on the other brand are?
I'm interested in this too. It doesn't make sense for the to do so. Thst would mean that they know who the town is in the other brand too, wich gives them too much power imo.

Posted: Sat Jan 14, 2017 8:58 pm
by Pepchoninga
In post 914, MathBlade wrote:Oh so they could bring over all scum to one brand...Meh don't see it though. I still think they know who each other are though. I don't see a way for scum to play with only half the info they would need.
If all scum are on one brand what would happen tot he other? Obviously the scum is prolly gonna win the brand that they are on, but if the GM on the brand that all the scumare in is scum this basically means that eventually scumwins both the brands. This actually seems like a reasonable tactic for scum. That for me means that one of the GMs is scum.

Posted: Sat Jan 14, 2017 8:58 pm
by Pepchoninga
In post 953, Pepchoninga wrote:
In post 885, DodgeTheSaint wrote:Why does AC know that mafia on this brand would know who the mafia on the other brand are?
I'm interested in this too. It doesn't make sense for the to do so. Thst would mean that they know who the town is in the other brand too, wich gives them too much power imo.
Ok, this was answered.

Posted: Sat Jan 14, 2017 8:59 pm
by Pepchoninga
In post 900, MathBlade wrote:It becomes important to determine the trust levels of the managers early and see if they can be trusted.

It is also worth a note that if all the mafia go to one side the side with all town wins LOL
Would they?

Posted: Sat Jan 14, 2017 9:02 pm
by Pepchoninga
In post 918, MathBlade wrote:I would much rather Titus and myself be on the same side. Much as I normally hate it Grey here and me to the other team is the right call. It depends on if massive would draft me though and because of what was a shitty ass combo with no warning (gee thanks! Sarcasm) we can't ask. Mainly if I am the NK and I get drafted RAW and Smackdown numbers stay the same overnight.

If not then in essence we still lose a player.

Then the Maria R and Titus thing can be truly settled as those two should 1v1 tomorrow and it is worth noting that Maria did it to love, not the person who would almost damn near confirm her environment instead a freaking loved claim. Maria /Pep and myself both being vig claims would make sense to be in the same place if possible. Would like Titus there as well to further the situation.

Draft Grey and another townread as a backup is my two cents.
I kinda don't like his line of thinking.

Posted: Sat Jan 14, 2017 9:04 pm
by MathBlade
Their

Posted: Sat Jan 14, 2017 9:05 pm
by MathBlade
In post 956, Pepchoninga wrote:
In post 900, MathBlade wrote:It becomes important to determine the trust levels of the managers early and see if they can be trusted.

It is also worth a note that if all the mafia go to one side the side with all town wins LOL
Would they?
Yes because there would be zero mafia for that brand so then it becomes traditional mafia. The biggest strength of scum is we don't know how many or where. Once one brand eliminates all mafia then the other brand should have a much easier time.

Posted: Sat Jan 14, 2017 9:06 pm
by MathBlade
In post 954, Pepchoninga wrote:
In post 914, MathBlade wrote:Oh so they could bring over all scum to one brand...Meh don't see it though. I still think they know who each other are though. I don't see a way for scum to play with only half the info they would need.
If all scum are on one brand what would happen tot he other? Obviously the scum is prolly gonna win the brand that they are on, but if the GM on the brand that all the scumare in is scum this basically means that eventually scumwins both the brands. This actually seems like a reasonable tactic for scum. That for me means that one of the GMs is scum.
...If no mafia exist Town wins?

I don't like how you are trying to complicate things.

Posted: Sat Jan 14, 2017 9:12 pm
by Almost Chara
In post 952, Pepchoninga wrote:
In post 880, Almost Chara wrote:
In post 858, Lil Uzi Vert wrote:I believe the claim so I see no reason to break up the masons.
Also, reading this again I see you see it my way. Doesn't that give you a pose or an urge for second thoughts?

I mean, Scum!Me would certainly want to execute the Masons, and we have even been provided with "an out" to do it. I we're Scum them it's likely the Masons aren't really Masons. so, why do you choose to believe they are indeed Masons while simultaneously being suspicious of our slot?

~A50
I don't like this post. Seems to me, like it's just a way to manipulate the other players into an ultimate misslynch/bad decisions.
A mislynch on WHOM? I clearly said time and time again that I'm TOWN READING MARIA. How does that lead to a mislynch on her or Pepto??

~A50

Posted: Sat Jan 14, 2017 9:21 pm
by Pepchoninga
In post 958, MathBlade wrote:Their
Sorry, if you are a hydra it's hard for me to think of you as one, when you are not doing as Chara.

Posted: Sat Jan 14, 2017 9:22 pm
by Pepchoninga
In post 961, Almost Chara wrote:
In post 952, Pepchoninga wrote:
In post 880, Almost Chara wrote:
In post 858, Lil Uzi Vert wrote:I believe the claim so I see no reason to break up the masons.
Also, reading this again I see you see it my way. Doesn't that give you a pose or an urge for second thoughts?

I mean, Scum!Me would certainly want to execute the Masons, and we have even been provided with "an out" to do it. I we're Scum them it's likely the Masons aren't really Masons. so, why do you choose to believe they are indeed Masons while simultaneously being suspicious of our slot?

~A50
I don't like this post. Seems to me, like it's just a way to manipulate the other players into an ultimate misslynch/bad decisions.
A mislynch on WHOM? I clearly said time and time again that I'm TOWN READING MARIA. How does that lead to a mislynch on her or Pepto??

~A50
A misslynch on this brand.

Posted: Sat Jan 14, 2017 9:22 pm
by Pepchoninga
Or in this case a miss vig shot.

Posted: Sat Jan 14, 2017 9:23 pm
by Pepchoninga
In post 960, MathBlade wrote:
In post 954, Pepchoninga wrote:
In post 914, MathBlade wrote:Oh so they could bring over all scum to one brand...Meh don't see it though. I still think they know who each other are though. I don't see a way for scum to play with only half the info they would need.
If all scum are on one brand what would happen tot he other? Obviously the scum is prolly gonna win the brand that they are on, but if the GM on the brand that all the scumare in is scum this basically means that eventually scumwins both the brands. This actually seems like a reasonable tactic for scum. That for me means that one of the GMs is scum.
...If no mafia exist Town wins?

I don't like how you are trying to complicate things.
I guess you are right, but I just a had more complicated thought in my head.

Posted: Sat Jan 14, 2017 9:35 pm
by Almost50
In post 964, Pepchoninga wrote:Or in this case a miss vig shot.
Mate, what ARE you talking about? Are you even reading and comprehending?

The Vig shot HAS been triggered on Dodge, and it has always been the intention of Math to shoot there.

The post you're referring to was me responding to LUV, who is NOT even the Vig target.

And if you're talking about the future (just in case you are); Math has already claimed a ONE SHOT Vig, so they're not going to shoot anyone anymore.

Please let me know if I had misunderstood something, because what I did understand doesn't make sense anyway I look at it.

~A50

Posted: Sat Jan 14, 2017 9:47 pm
by Almost Chara
In post 966, Almost50 wrote:
In post 964, Pepchoninga wrote:Or in this case a miss vig shot.
Mate, what ARE you talking about? Are you even reading and comprehending?

The Vig shot HAS been triggered on Dodge, and it has always been the intention of Math to shoot there.

The post you're referring to was me responding to LUV, who is NOT even the Vig target.

And if you're talking about the future (just in case you are); Math has already claimed a ONE SHOT Vig, so they're not going to shoot anyone anymore.

Please let me know if I had misunderstood something, because what I did understand doesn't make sense anyway I look at it.

~A50
:lol:

@Vince:

You have my consent & approval of giving Math ONE more Vig shot, provided they ONLY shoot me if I do this again! :oops:

Posted: Sat Jan 14, 2017 9:51 pm
by MathBlade
I think scum are trying to make things more complex than they should be.

Erm twilight zone?

What does that bold mean? Are you giving me a second vig without seeing if I live or if Dodge flips scum?

Posted: Sat Jan 14, 2017 9:51 pm
by MathBlade
And why would I shoot you for hydra slipping?

Posted: Sat Jan 14, 2017 10:01 pm
by Almost Chara
It's a joke, Math. I make a lot of hydra slipping, and it's starting to be annoying even to me.

Posted: Sat Jan 14, 2017 10:02 pm
by MathBlade
Oh okay good night then.

Posted: Sat Jan 14, 2017 10:15 pm
by Almost Chara
Sleep tight :)

Posted: Sun Jan 15, 2017 12:03 am
by Pepchoninga
In post 966, Almost50 wrote:
In post 964, Pepchoninga wrote:Or in this case a miss vig shot.
Mate, what ARE you talking about? Are you even reading and comprehending?

The Vig shot HAS been triggered on Dodge, and it has always been the intention of Math to shoot there.

The post you're referring to was me responding to LUV, who is NOT even the Vig target.

And if you're talking about the future (just in case you are); Math has already claimed a ONE SHOT Vig, so they're not going to shoot anyone anymore.

Please let me know if I had misunderstood something, because what I did understand doesn't make sense anyway I look at it.

~A50
You haven't missunderstood, I just missed the vig shot being made.

Posted: Sun Jan 15, 2017 5:22 am
by malpascp
In post 963, Pepchoninga wrote:
In post 961, Almost Chara wrote:
In post 952, Pepchoninga wrote:
In post 880, Almost Chara wrote:
In post 858, Lil Uzi Vert wrote:I believe the claim so I see no reason to break up the masons.
Also, reading this again I see you see it my way. Doesn't that give you a pose or an urge for second thoughts?

I mean, Scum!Me would certainly want to execute the Masons, and we have even been provided with "an out" to do it. I we're Scum them it's likely the Masons aren't really Masons. so, why do you choose to believe they are indeed Masons while simultaneously being suspicious of our slot?

~A50
I don't like this post. Seems to me, like it's just a way to manipulate the other players into an ultimate misslynch/bad decisions.
A mislynch on WHOM? I clearly said time and time again that I'm TOWN READING MARIA. How does that lead to a mislynch on her or Pepto??

~A50
A misslynch on this brand.
The posts you quoted have zero content about this brand. Why'd you quote something about the masons, say it's AC pushing for a mislynch, then correct it to "a mislynch on THIS brand". Sounds like your initial read was not legitimate at all. Just a made up read on AC with some generic wording.

So we're doing into Night Phase the moment Kuroi comes online, right?