Page 13 of 107

Posted: Tue Dec 27, 2016 11:56 am
by davesaz
In post 262, grapes wrote:
Realeo ( 4 ) -
(ssbm_Kyouko, Gamma Emerald, algebra, Secret Agent Jin)
Superhans ( 2 ) -
(Kop, MariaR)
MariaR ( 2 ) -
(ReubenWasFine, ThinkBig)
Secret Agent Jin ( 2 ) -
(davesaz, Dunnstral)
Gamma Emerald ( 1 ) -
(Superhans)

Not Voting ( 1 ) -
(Realeo)
In post 291, grapes wrote:
Gamma Emerald ( 5 ) -
(Superhans, ThinkBig, Realeo, Desperado, Kop)
Realeo ( 3 ) -
(ssbm_Kyouko, algebra, Secret Agent Jin)
Desperado ( 2 ) -
(ReubenWasFine, Gamma Emerald)
Secret Agent Jin ( 2 ) -
(davesaz, Dunnstral)

Not Voting ( 0 )
Gamma's wagon popped up really fast. I agree that there is not much content there, but don't know that it rates such a quick L-2. Though I do endorse the idea of wagons as town, to try to get movement. I want to examine which votes seem opportunistic there. Unfortunately most of them are going to come across that way. Realeo and Desperado still stand out for placement and CW reasons.

I see Realeo as having more posts but much the same kind of posting as Gamma. MariaR/Desperado slot is similar as well.
I'm only partway through reviewing the game, still getting impressions on everyone...

Posted: Tue Dec 27, 2016 12:07 pm
by Superhans
What do you mean by CW reasons?

Posted: Tue Dec 27, 2016 12:11 pm
by davesaz
counter wagon

Posted: Tue Dec 27, 2016 12:11 pm
by davesaz
Which is not enough to go on by itself of course, but important to recognize.

Posted: Tue Dec 27, 2016 12:21 pm
by algebra
I think Superhans is town. His word choice has a type of bounce to it that I really like.

Posted: Tue Dec 27, 2016 12:22 pm
by Gamma Emerald
In post 304, algebra wrote:I think Superhans is town. His word choice has a type of bounce to it that I really like.
Explain?

Posted: Tue Dec 27, 2016 2:18 pm
by Dunnstral
In post 283, Superhans wrote:Dunnstral is scummy.
Want to back this egregious accusation up with some facts?

Posted: Tue Dec 27, 2016 2:19 pm
by Dunnstral
In post 293, Superhans wrote:^Ah i messed up, Dunnstral doesn't vote Dave, but calls him scummy with no explanation,
Change question to:
@Dunnstral why did you scum read Dave?
Because he made a scummy post.

Posted: Tue Dec 27, 2016 2:21 pm
by davesaz
Which post and why do you think it's scummy?

Posted: Tue Dec 27, 2016 2:23 pm
by Dunnstral
In post 139, davesaz wrote:
In post 137, Dunnstral wrote:
In post 130, ThinkBig wrote:
In post 102, Dunnstral wrote:It's about intent. Get off of me. I'm not getting lynched. Vote Gamma.
In post 103, Dunnstral wrote:Next thing you know I'll be l-5 followed by l-4
I find these two posts to be an over reaction and I'm not liking post 103.
To play devil's advocate for myself, not sure why I'd make such a big deal of it as scum
In order to wifom once people call you on it.
In post 140, davesaz wrote:
In post 136, Superhans wrote:
In post 135, Dunnstral wrote:
In post 117, Superhans wrote:@Dunnstral,
Why are you voting Gamma?
Would you want to convince other players to do the same?
He's not engaging in anything while being here, very odd for him.


MARIA is also trying to be as scummy as possible it would seem
I can get behind a pressure wagon.
VOTE: Gamma Emerald
Pressure is more useful if the target doesn't know you're voting merely for pressure.
Also note to myself to see if the quoted post becomes relevant later.
These ones. I thought they were scummy at the time. I didin't vote you and you can stop acting like you didn't do anything

Posted: Tue Dec 27, 2016 2:31 pm
by Realeo
In post 295, davesaz wrote:The Gamma wagon is in response to a clear joke based on username
No it's not? Only ThinkBig voted because of that.

Posted: Tue Dec 27, 2016 2:40 pm
by Realeo
Gamma is capable of making content when the RVS is over, fyi.

Posted: Tue Dec 27, 2016 3:27 pm
by davesaz
In post 309, Dunnstral wrote: These ones. I thought they were scummy at the time. I didin't vote you and you can stop acting like you didn't do anything
I'm not sure what you mean by "acting like I didn't do anything". Am I trying to disclaim posts or something?

The question is why you thought they were scummy. Do you not want to answer that question?

Posted: Tue Dec 27, 2016 3:30 pm
by Dunnstral
They're scummy because I felt like they were. If I wanted to make a case it wouldn't be off of those two posts.

Posted: Tue Dec 27, 2016 3:33 pm
by davesaz
In post 311, Realeo wrote:Gamma is capable of making content when the RVS is over, fyi.
Yeah, I had already noted the lack of content.
In post 300, davesaz wrote:I agree that there is not much content there
However the timing of when the wagon happened could be important. Whether the people who voted were voting because of the joke, the joke seems to be the trigger on timing. The first vote after that point could have brought Gamma to the attention of the others. That happens to coincide with Desperado being voted. It makes me wonder if there is someone who doesn't want Desperado votes.

Posted: Tue Dec 27, 2016 3:36 pm
by davesaz
In post 313, Dunnstral wrote:They're scummy because I felt like they were. If I wanted to make a case it wouldn't be off of those two posts.
That's not going to help sort your motive, but whatever you like...

Posted: Tue Dec 27, 2016 11:54 pm
by Superhans
@Dunnstral
How is scummy in your opinion?
I thought Dave makes a very very genuine point.
In post 313, Dunnstral wrote:They're scummy because I felt like they were. If I wanted to make a case it wouldn't be off of those two posts.
Why would you say this? You're discrediting yourself, saying that your scumcusation on Davesaz isn't founded on any basis.

Posted: Tue Dec 27, 2016 11:56 pm
by Dunnstral
I said his post was scummy, I didn't say we should vote him.

139 is scummy because he says I'd be wifoming something that seems dumb to say that about

Posted: Wed Dec 28, 2016 12:03 am
by Superhans
Nah i disagree, your is definitely an example of terrible terrible logic.

Posted: Wed Dec 28, 2016 12:04 am
by Superhans
Sketchy AF logic.

Posted: Wed Dec 28, 2016 12:07 am
by Superhans
In post 299, Gamma Emerald wrote:Soon, hopefully.
I'll note my reaction to Desperado was intended to draw scumreads on myself via the fact desperados only pose a threat to scum.
What do you mean by this? Are we talking about Desparados as in a
"desperate or reckless person, especially a criminal."
. Why would a desperado pose a threat to scum? SOrry if im being a right thicko.

Posted: Wed Dec 28, 2016 12:07 am
by Dunnstral
ok


I disagree, and I'd say I know better because I'm me

Posted: Wed Dec 28, 2016 12:11 am
by Dunnstral
UNVOTE:

Posted: Wed Dec 28, 2016 1:10 am
by ssbm_Kyouko
In post 320, Superhans wrote:
In post 299, Gamma Emerald wrote:Soon, hopefully.
I'll note my reaction to Desperado was intended to draw scumreads on myself via the fact desperados only pose a threat to scum.
What do you mean by this? Are we talking about Desparados as in a
"desperate or reckless person, especially a criminal."
. Why would a desperado pose a threat to scum? SOrry if im being a right thicko.
http://wiki.mafiascum.net/index.php?tit ... %28Role%29

Posted: Wed Dec 28, 2016 3:30 am
by algebra
In post 305, Gamma Emerald wrote:
In post 304, algebra wrote:I think Superhans is town. His word choice has a type of bounce to it that I really like.
Explain?
Explain how?