I'm not sure when I will be able to clarify this, but please please please do not remove the vote. I also cannot remove mine. All I can say is that it's now 100% on chen and dunn to convince me why I should vote for someone else. They fail to do that and my vote doesn't move. Ideally neither does yours.
In post 557, Don Draper x Mistress wrote:You want me to be the next lynch and no one is stupid enough here to believe otherwise.
?????
what?
You don’t want me in LYLO because you are never going to convince me to lynch you and you prefer to take your chances with eth0s/Chenn over me. It makes perfect sense. I definitely wouldn’t want me in LYLO either if I was you and you are adamantly opposing my being lynched, because that’s exactly what you want to happen. If you were actually town here, you’d actually try to show me that I’m wrong about you but instead you’re engaging in all of these AtE theatrics to confuse everybody but I see through it and I’m sure they do too.
Your point?
I’ve obviously changed my mind since then. I actually wrongly believed you were gambiting to get me instalynched but none of that matters now because things have now changed and I’m your perfect goat.
Explain how Chenn is neutral and I’m lockscum. I am going to continue to repeat this until you finally answer the goddamned question
.
If you think eth0s town, Chenn neutral and me scum, that means you’re not 100% confident on Chenn town, which means you could be wrong on scum me. The fact that your continue to refuse to answer this is extremely concerning.
In post 800, eth0s wrote:All I can say is that it's now 100% on chen and dunn to convince me why I should vote for someone else. They fail to do that and my vote doesn't move. Ideally neither does yours.
You'll self vote by deadline, but I won't vote ddxm by deadline.
Keep up this bs discredit by making it sound like my recent posts are contradicting older ones. I’ve clearly changed my mind since then and I think you’re doing that is scummy.
Why aren’t you townlocking Chenn then? He shouldn’t be a goddamned neutral to you.
In post 800, eth0s wrote:All I can say is that it's now 100% on chen and dunn to convince me why I should vote for someone else. They fail to do that and my vote doesn't move. Ideally neither does yours.
You'll self vote by deadline, but I won't vote ddxm by deadline.
It doesn't matter. I kinda tricked you a little bit. Sorry.
In post 1, Something_Smart wrote:8. If more than half the players are voting for a player, then that player is lynched and removed from the game, and the day will end. If the deadline is reached before majority occurs, plurality will kick in, and whoever has the most votes will be lynched (ties broken by whoever more recently had more votes).
No lynch doesn't exist in this setup. Just noticed that.
As it currently stands, ddxm has had 2 voted on them longer than anyone else has. as long as those 2 votes don't move, ddxm is lynched at deadline. Now dunn and chen convince me why each other is town please.
In post 1, Something_Smart wrote:7. No vote trickery. Votes inside spoiler tags and obviously broken quotes will not be counted. Don't attempt to confuse other players over whether your vote was valid.
In post 800, eth0s wrote:All I can say is that it's now 100% on chen and dunn to convince me why I should vote for someone else. They fail to do that and my vote doesn't move. Ideally neither does yours.
You'll self vote by deadline, but I won't vote ddxm by deadline.
It doesn't matter. I kinda tricked you a little bit. Sorry.
In post 1, Something_Smart wrote:8. If more than half the players are voting for a player, then that player is lynched and removed from the game, and the day will end. If the deadline is reached before majority occurs, plurality will kick in, and whoever has the most votes will be lynched (ties broken by whoever more recently had more votes).
No lynch doesn't exist in this setup. Just noticed that.
As it currently stands, ddxm has had 2 voted on them longer than anyone else has. as long as those 2 votes don't move, ddxm is lynched at deadline. Now dunn and chen convince me why each other is town please.
In post 800, eth0s wrote:All I can say is that it's now 100% on chen and dunn to convince me why I should vote for someone else. They fail to do that and my vote doesn't move. Ideally neither does yours.
You'll self vote by deadline, but I won't vote ddxm by deadline.
It doesn't matter. I kinda tricked you a little bit. Sorry.
In post 1, Something_Smart wrote:8. If more than half the players are voting for a player, then that player is lynched and removed from the game, and the day will end. If the deadline is reached before majority occurs, plurality will kick in, and whoever has the most votes will be lynched (ties broken by whoever more recently had more votes).
No lynch doesn't exist in this setup. Just noticed that.
As it currently stands, ddxm has had 2 voted on them longer than anyone else has. as long as those 2 votes don't move, ddxm is lynched at deadline. Now dunn and chen convince me why each other is town please.
Really but you need 3 votes, don’t you?
the second sentence in the rule clarifies that. No majority needed.
In post 800, eth0s wrote:All I can say is that it's now 100% on chen and dunn to convince me why I should vote for someone else. They fail to do that and my vote doesn't move. Ideally neither does yours.
You'll self vote by deadline, but I won't vote ddxm by deadline.
It doesn't matter. I kinda tricked you a little bit. Sorry.
In post 1, Something_Smart wrote:8. If more than half the players are voting for a player, then that player is lynched and removed from the game, and the day will end. If the deadline is reached before majority occurs, plurality will kick in, and whoever has the most votes will be lynched (ties broken by whoever more recently had more votes).
No lynch doesn't exist in this setup. Just noticed that.
As it currently stands, ddxm has had 2 voted on them longer than anyone else has. as long as those 2 votes don't move, ddxm is lynched at deadline. Now dunn and chen convince me why each other is town please.
Really but you need 3 votes, don’t you?
the second sentence in the rule clarifies that. No majority needed.
Even if you're right I can still try to get the last vote in. If that's a risk you wanna take then by all means don't convince me on why chennis is town.
In post 800, eth0s wrote:All I can say is that it's now 100% on chen and dunn to convince me why I should vote for someone else. They fail to do that and my vote doesn't move. Ideally neither does yours.
You'll self vote by deadline, but I won't vote ddxm by deadline.
It doesn't matter. I kinda tricked you a little bit. Sorry.
In post 1, Something_Smart wrote:8. If more than half the players are voting for a player, then that player is lynched and removed from the game, and the day will end. If the deadline is reached before majority occurs, plurality will kick in, and whoever has the most votes will be lynched (ties broken by whoever more recently had more votes).
No lynch doesn't exist in this setup. Just noticed that.
As it currently stands, ddxm has had 2 voted on them longer than anyone else has. as long as those 2 votes don't move, ddxm is lynched at deadline. Now dunn and chen convince me why each other is town please.
Oh I played a game like this. Now I understand why you were in such a hurry to get me to self-vote. Dunn and Chenn have to vote you in LYLO and whichever doesn’t is essentially scumclaiming.
