Of all tyrannies,a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end they do so with the approval of their own conscience.
So I kinda forgot the game was happening, but I've played this setup a couple times in sitechat before, (and modded them, too) and usually it doesn't matter who gets lynched first, just because if you get town, you get a confirmed townie, and most of the time by the first couple minutes based on who's working with who and so on and so forth. I saw the votecount and it looked like it was him or you. I knew if I voted you I'd either get scum and p much win, or I'd get town and you'd shoot him (killing scum). That's how it goes pretty much every time. So I flipped a coin that would only land heads up.
I get this setup mixed up a lot, though, with SS3 (and also every time I skim this I think townies are perma one-shot lynchproof) which is why I posted like I did at beginning of day 2. I know you know I'm town, cuz if you didn't think I was, you'd have shot me yesterday. Let's lynch RC and win this thing for the homies?
It's always the same. When you fire that first shot, no matter how right you feel, you have no idea who's going to die. You don't know whose children are going to scream and burn. How many hearts will be broken. How many lives shattered. How much blood will spill, until everybody does what they're always going to have to do from the very beginning... SIT DOWN AND TALK!
Of all tyrannies,a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end they do so with the approval of their own conscience.
Of all tyrannies,a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end they do so with the approval of their own conscience.
i get that i want to kill Elsa Jay every game but I want to kill Elsa Jay this game.
Of all tyrannies,a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end they do so with the approval of their own conscience.
Of all tyrannies,a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end they do so with the approval of their own conscience.
Of all tyrannies,a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end they do so with the approval of their own conscience.
In post 46, Elsa Jay wrote:People with numbers in their username are ten times more likely to be evil.
Since I'm an SK, guess I better switch to my alt iiSq5024 then
In post 63, Elsa Jay wrote:I'm just saying it's not unbiased since we had a guy choose it. If they rolled the tag dice I would've said it was completely unbiased but they didn't. Therefore there's a mild bias.
In post 60, Elsa Jay wrote:It's not unbiased though since you started it for some unknown reason. If your town fair enough, but it aint unbiased atleast.
Assuming i am a member of a 6 man scum team.
That changes the likelihood down to 12.5% chance we lynch scum. (Assuming i did not vote a partner)
Still not terrible odds.
In post 126, AaronFrost wrote:We should at the very least wait for everyone to check in first before we decide on a lynch. I don't want this to turn into a 500 page D1, but I also don't want like 20 lurker slots going into D2.
In post 140, Elsa Jay wrote:If they're like Joan, fair play for shooting. But I'm more lenient for that in a game of this size.
But shooting someone who doesn't talk means they're a lurker, scum, or a PR. If you shoot there your risking a bit. So be careful to the vigi(s).
Not that I “Do” want to be wagoned.
I just think people should be wagoned for something they did. How they did it. Why they did it.
Not wagoned with over 7 votes without even posting.
You all should know I’m not toxic anymore.
Heck even Chemist should know that.
But I don’t blame Chemist because he votes me every chance he gets. Regardless of alignment.
In post 162, TrueSoulEnergy wrote:I’m willing to bet there’s probably more then 1 scum in here.
I think I’m cool with voting within my voters today.
(Not Chemist though because it’s Chemist and I explained this before)
UNVOTE:
I didn't bother looking at the 7 pages because i thought it would be pure RVS and nothing else, okay?
quote="In post 179, Hectic"]My general play-style Day 1 is to lurk in the background. Take a breath. Breathe out.
I'll be observing Day 1, and going hardcore Day 2 and on. That's how I roll. I'll still pick at things during Day 1 if they catch my attention. I'm probably going to make a copy/paste post about this for all games I play, because it gets annoying when some ree in light of this information.
I'll be observing in the background. Please don't assume that I'm not present when you're posting.[/quote]
In post 149, TrueSoulEnergy wrote:Well I know for a straight out fact 1 of the people on my starting wagon is scum.
Also, do you all honestly think I’m still toxic?
Hey, TSE. Here you imply role information, then do fuck all with it. If you know for a fact, either you have specific info on a single player, or you have some broader "there are x scum in players abc" type knowledge, or you're scum and hinting that you're being bussed like Nero suggests. If you don't, you're completely full of shit.
If you have role info that means town can make a better lynch, then hinting at it rather than outing it means you're already playing badly in an anti town way.
If you're hinting bus, you're scum.
If you're just making it up to try to redirect attention away from you to your Wagoners, then you're being kinda toxic already.
So ten pages in, I'm already left thinking you're either scum, playing really badly, or toxic.
Your Nero vote is pretty bad -even if he's slightly misreading one post, he's showing scumhunting motive. It reads omgus at best, which is not inherently scummy but is a thing I've seen you do that contributes to your perceived toxicity.
So let's turn the volume down. If your "I know there's scum" thing is just your usual overconfidence, then admit that now, and I at least will let it slide. Then tell me something you've noticed about a player NOT on your wagon, and not relating to something they've said about you. Can be anything game relevant. I feel like if you direct your energy at scumhunting on your own wagon, it will continue to come across as defensive and omgussy and look toxic or scummy, making the wagon a self fulfilling prophecy. If you want to help town, look elsewhere, except if you genuinely DO have helpful role info.
In post 149, TrueSoulEnergy wrote:Well I know for a straight out fact 1 of the people on my starting wagon is scum.
there is no "I think" here.
u said u knew. How would u know?
and to be honest, a game with 13 scum and u pick the lowest possible # seems a bit...eh
Because I don’t believe my wagon to be pure town.
Please acknowledge me. I made a long post addressed to you, quite rude to ignore it.
I don't believe your wagon is pure town but I don't think it's actually more scum than random atm. I believe you personally are more likely to be wrong in identifying the scum on your wagon than basically anyone else because you can't separate seeing things as scummy from your own feeling of persecution. Please look offwagon
In post 303, profii wrote:how do you know the other scum faction are werewolves ?
It's always the same. When you fire that first shot, no matter how right you feel, you have no idea who's going to die. You don't know whose children are going to scream and burn. How many hearts will be broken. How many lives shattered. How much blood will spill, until everybody does what they're always going to have to do from the very beginning... SIT DOWN AND TALK!
Of all tyrannies,a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end they do so with the approval of their own conscience.
oh finally a list of players that are in here. Waiting on Gold and Ethos.
Of all tyrannies,a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end they do so with the approval of their own conscience.
In post 16, Kirari Momobami wrote:Sorry did you think you should be townread for claiming SK and enthusiastically greeting people?
No, I should be nullread because it's clearly a personality thing.
It's always the same. When you fire that first shot, no matter how right you feel, you have no idea who's going to die. You don't know whose children are going to scream and burn. How many hearts will be broken. How many lives shattered. How much blood will spill, until everybody does what they're always going to have to do from the very beginning... SIT DOWN AND TALK!
In post 19, Something_Smart wrote:No, I should be nullread because it's clearly a personality thing.
Do you think that throwing out lowkey pockety nothing posts in a 50 player game is merely "null"?
Sorry but no
I'm happy to re-evaluate later and it's not like I'm hard pushing to lynch you at the moment so I think your passive-aggressive shut-down of my read is nagl
It's always the same. When you fire that first shot, no matter how right you feel, you have no idea who's going to die. You don't know whose children are going to scream and burn. How many hearts will be broken. How many lives shattered. How much blood will spill, until everybody does what they're always going to have to do from the very beginning... SIT DOWN AND TALK!
Also, I gotta ask what you mean by "lowkey pockety." If friendliness is pocketing now, one of us must be confused.
It's always the same. When you fire that first shot, no matter how right you feel, you have no idea who's going to die. You don't know whose children are going to scream and burn. How many hearts will be broken. How many lives shattered. How much blood will spill, until everybody does what they're always going to have to do from the very beginning... SIT DOWN AND TALK!
SS, your not calling TSE scum and then fence-sitting on him in 911 and then trying to paint me as a TSE possible TSE buddy seems all kinds of weird. Should I start scum reading you now?
Of all tyrannies,a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end they do so with the approval of their own conscience.
