976: mystyry box of sylvyr I: isis game. day 3

[Akarin]

Okay, so at the end of the game, we can logically conclude that Nic was scum with me and Dunn, and Mastina was town.

Schadd really screwed up the role PMs this game.

[Akarin]

Like it was a 90% chance, not a 0% chance. And as was said at the time, town is more likely than 50%

anyway

. He just thought his read was stronger than that, all game people kept coming back to have doubts on Dunn, and I don't think it was totally insane to do so.

[MathBlade]

No. We can’t.

Nic was town but when someone ignores what the mod tells them (in this case Dunn as 3P) then continues to hang onto that despite being corrected and vouched for by a townread who has had a shit ton of EXP with the player, the elim had to happen barring someone providing more than a read.

Yes. 90% chance. Means you don’t push them d1 ever.

I think insane is the wrong word but Dunn when a PR plays scummy to avoid the NK but still generally keeps up and boosts others. Scum Dunn is a lurk sac.

[Akarin]

I think you're absolutely wrong but I don't see any point to continuing this discussion.

To the earlier point, I'm not trying to be mean here but it does feel pointless to argue, and

inside a game

I'd probably be getting frustrated here as well. Because it feels like it comes more from your own strong opinions than anything else, but you present them as objective fact and can't be budged. And that can be frustrating and I think sometimes "agree to disagree" as much as it's a cliche, is actually the best option.

But it's so tempting to want to just go around in circles because SOMEONE IS WRONG ON THE INTERNET.

[MathBlade]

Some plays may not always get the best result but are 100% necessary. Eg 95% of the time a player claiming that bad is scum. Could they be town, sure. Until you bring the percentage down I don’t care and will funnel them.

Ignoring mod confirmed info is one of those 95% things.

Pedit: Agree to disagree here I think is good because it is objective. I am presenting it as such because it is imho.

[Akarin]

And I'm saying it's only necessary because you think it is. It isn't necessary to me and I think there are plenty of other players where that situation would have played out differently. Not trying to like blame you too much here, but I think a lot of the necessity of it comes from your own personality than from objective fact.

But there I go fighting the WRONG ON THE INTERNET fight for no reason.

[MathBlade]

Gonna agree to disagree to avoid the cycle here and not respond to that to avoid repetitiveness.

[Akarin]

[Isis]