Inferno's Nomic (Game begins! Signups still available!)

[Charles510]

How would a player be unable to reply to the topic but still be able to contact the mod privately?

[Inferno390]

VOTE: JGDA's suggestion

[Inferno390]

It's not you, this game was just horribly designed and I don't feel like sticking around and wasting my time trying to fix the awfulness

plz the awfulness is what makes this a challenge

Oh, and VOTE: Nay 18b

presumably you made your ruleset from suber's original ruleset. which included exactly the rule i am suggesting. it's an important rule. we can't have you resolve all rule ambiguities forever.

I agree wit hyou on that. However, I've read your rule over twice, and I can't seem to understand what it's getting at. If it were clearer, I'd probably vote yea.

[James Brafin]

VOTE: Yea to Amendment to Rule 10

[Vijarada]

point taken. the reason i didn't rip the rule straight off of suber's ruleset is something that happened in a place called nomic world in 1992 (!) where a judge used his high power as a judge to declare himself the winner. the approach taken after that incident was to have judges rule on the falsity of a particular game-related statement. basically, when a cfj is called, the next player in turn order is the Judge and empowered to resolve CFJs. CFJs cost 2 points to avoid frivolous calling of CFJs. You can bar the next player in turn order from being the judge if they have a conflict of interest, if that's the case the player after them is the judge. That's pretty much all I'm getting at. I can try to make it clearer the next time around..

[Inferno390]

Yeah, that would be swell. So you use the CFJ to resolve rules quirks?

[Vijarada]

To resolve ambiguities and make rules interpretations, yes. Because there are ambiguities, even now.

[Inferno390]

Yeah, if it was a bit clearer, I'd probably have voted yea.

[James Brafin]

VOTE: Yea New Rule 18 (Vij)

[James Brafin]

Fellissan to suggest.

[Inferno390]

Not_Mafia has joined the game. Fellissan to suggest.

[James Brafin]

It's been almost three days since the last suggestion. I'd like to move to remove Fellisan from the game. Mod?

[Inferno390]

Fellissan has been prodded. If he does not respond within 24 hours, the turn will pass to the next player.

[Charles510]

VOTE: Yea to Amendment to Rule 10

[Felissan]

/out

[James Brafin]

Allomancer to suggest. The rule 10 amendment passes, so whoever did that gets to roll for points.

[James Brafin]

I'm waiting until my turn to suggest an amendment to rule 1.

[JDGA]

Original Roll String: 1d6

1 6-Sided Dice: (2) = 2

[Inferno390]

Allomancer to suggest.

[James Brafin]

It's been almost two days since the last post.

@MOD, please prod.

On the bright side, we active players should start talking about what we'd like to do. I'd like to set up an economy, with shops and everything. That would be pretty cool. I'd also like to add a little bit of RPG flair (Nothing major, just a little). I thought that might be cool.

[Inferno390]

It's been almost two days since the last post.

@MOD, please prod.

On the bright side, we active players should start talking about what we'd like to do. I'd like to set up an economy, with shops and everything. That would be pretty cool. I'd also like to add a little bit of RPG flair (Nothing major, just a little). I thought that might be cool.

I think this game is dead. I'll go ahead and prod Allomancer though.

[Inferno390]

Sadly, the game has gone dead. Can a mod please lock the thread?

[Not_Mafia]

I blame that mod colour

[Charles510]

It was the proposing and voting in turns that killed the game.

[Not_Mafia]

It was professor plum in the dining room with the revolver