@mallow: You answered yes to the question preceding that one, as to what you would do if you were nominated. I was asking more specifically to clarify whether this was your actual position, because I don't much like it. Your claim was that you wanted to vote nein on others to get more information, per post 113. Then in post 123 you said that you would ja yourself, because in your words "I clearly can trust myself".
There are two problems with this:
1) You are denying other players the information you claim you want to gain.
2) Your reason for voting ja on yourself (trust) has nothing to do with your reason to vote nein on everyone else (information). If you don't trust everyone else, then explain why, don't just policy vote nein on them. If you want to gain more voting info before the first policy, don't vote ja on yourself, try to get others to vote nein on you with you, to see who does.
Note sure why you're bringing up the fact that Reck can confirm your claim. It's not really relevant to my question, is it? For that matter, I'm not sure that it's relevant to anything.