Secret Hitler (Game Over)

[xRECKONERx]

do me and ill pick someone who hasn't gone yet?

[Mitillos]

@Reck: Could you clarify what you mean, there?

[SaskeIsMyYaoiKismesis]

okay SO

I CORROBORATE the motion to elect RECOKNER as the chancellor for this present election! (๑•̀ㅂ•́)و

HOWEVER I possess excruciatingly exasperatingly embarrassingly MOROSE news... and that is that I have DECIDED to REPLACE out of this game (⊙︿⊙✿)

I STAND BY my reads and TRULY wish that I could stay, HOWEVER my presence in this game will ONLY hurt town's chances since I have EVALUATED Reckoner as the kind of person whom will INSIST on sticking to his principles - our DOMINATING personalities will simply PERSIST in a RAGING war of TOXICITY and only DEVIATE town from SOLVING the game (〇o〇；)

My FINAL reads are as follows!

{Reck, Mallow} - These are ALWAYS liberals!
{Inspiratieloos, n_m} - I liked RadiantCowbells and n_m has MOSTLY advocated for pro-liberal reads and policies so they can be town! (ノ^∇^)
{Nico, BuJaber, Northsidegirl} - THESE slots need testing - BuJaber is the MOST likely town by play out of these BUT North DID pass a liberal policy so I could be wrong (ʃ⌣́,⌣́ƪ)
{Vijarada, Mitillos} - These are ALMOST always your Fascists

So YA, unfortunately this is the MOST healthy thing to do for the gamestate (҂⌣̀_⌣́)

As long as we CYCLE through electing Reck/Mallow/My slot and NEIN Vijarada and Mitillos I think it is VERY unlikely we lose the game as it is!

@Ausuka-chan, please REPLACE me out of your game - I wish the BEST of luck to the liberals and also would NOT like to be spoiled since I will watch the game! ヾ(｡･ω･)ｼ

[Ausuka]

replacing SIMYK.

[Ausuka]

Something_Smart replaces SaskeIsMyYaoiKimesis.

[Something_Smart]

Hi

[Something_Smart]

Why are you guys so ja-happy

This is literally impossible to read into...

[Something_Smart]

I think I should be chancellor. Saske's replace-out was ridiculously obviously town, and I think BuJaber is town but would like to get more confident in that.

[Not_Mafia]

It's the second election

[Something_Smart]

It's the third election I thought?

[Something_Smart]

Or did you mean, this is the time when we are able to create information with low risk, so we have an excuse to not create any information?

[Not_Mafia]

So we should arbitrarily nein for the sake of it?

[Something_Smart]

No, but you should not hesitate to nein if you have any bad feelings at all, or if you just want to see how the votes turn out.

[inspiratieloos]

I don't think I'd go so far as calling inspi fascist, but I am currently inclined to libread n_m.

It's defenitely arguable both ways what the best liberal play is if drawing 2l/1f, guaranteeing a liberal vs. getting more information, I think in this situation it would have been better for lib!NM to pass 1l/1f for the information and he claims to disagree. There are town motivations for either choice, however looking at it from the other perspective, assuming nsg is liberal, what would fascist!NM have done? Regardless of what he passes, liberal!nsg would play the liberal policy so he might as well give her 2l and deny us the information that nsg played a liberal while having a choice. So NM's actions would have been the same as either liberal or fascist, so this result is not an indication of NM being a liberal.


Anyway, if we're going with electing the most reliable person over electing someone new I agree we should pick Reck.

PEdit: Hey SS, good to have you.

I disagree that there's nothing to read in the first two votes, they show that the fascists either all or all-but-one voted in favour of these governments.

[Not_Mafia]

Why would fascists vote nein, they'd just out themselves

[Not_Mafia]

We're basically in RVS right now

[Mitillos]

@Mod: Can we get prods/replacements on Vij, nsg, and Nico? They haven't posted in over a week.

[BuJaber]

Just be careful with quick reads.
SS's predecessor is way too comfortable with reck and mallow.
If a president is liberal a fascist chancellor may not want to give them the investigative power.
Reck could have thrown out a liberal policy and lied.. etc.

I'm waiting for reck to explain what post 200 means

[mallowgeno]

Why are you guys so ja-happy

This is literally impossible to read into...

I don't think it's impossible to read into. It IS concerning that all the facists voted 'Ja' on this, that could mean that there is a facist out of NM and northsidegal. Not 100% but I wouldn't say we are void of information.

[xRECKONERx]

What isn't clear about post 200

[Something_Smart]

If you're made chancellor you can't "pick" anyone?

[xRECKONERx]

oh i forgot it passes via rotation not via selection, nvm

ill still be chancellor i guess

[Vijarada]

[quote="In post 218, mallowgeno"][/quote]

If all ja's are public and everyone makes clear they are planning to vote Ja, it would be foolish to vote Nein. Make you stick out like a sore thumb.

[northsidegal]

i don't really know how we're supposed to scumhunt outside of the elections

[Mitillos]

@nsg: Same way that one scumhunts in mafia. Look for posts that seem to indicate more knowledge about the game state. Look for lurking and an unwillingness to engage. Look for meaningless fluff posts. And, of course, look for contradictions. Also, when you're looking for suspicious posts, also look at the cases others have made, and see if you agree or disagree with them.

One example of scumhunting (that turned up nothing): In post 201, I asked reck about post 200. One way to read post 200 is that he would pick another member of government (something he couldn't do, but which seems to have been his intended meaning). Another way to read it was that he meant he'd investigate someone that hasn't gone yet. Of course, he wouldn't be able to investigate anyone, because he'd be chancellor in such a situation, but if this had been his meaning, it would also imply that he fully expected a fascist policy to go through. This was suspicious, hence the need for clarification.

Incidentally, is it true that N_M gave you two liberal policies? There seems to be little reason to doubt him, but I'd like to have everyone's claims written down for future reference.

@SS: You said that one should vote nein if they have any bad feelings. All you've given us on that front are a libread on BuJ and a claim that your slot is liberal because of the way they replaced out. How about something more to go on? Any other reads, thus far?

@mallow: Why did you not vote nein? You claimed that you prefer to vote nein, because that would create more information. Or did you already have all the info you needed for this election?