The captain breaks the tie and the distribution is agreed to!
Katyusha | 55 |
2 718281828459 | 45 |
James Brafin | 0 |
Charles510 | 0 |
That is only when I am second in command. So you SHOULD give me coins, because if it got down toIn post 27, Katyusha wrote:aight
E's optimal play is going to vote no matter what unless I give him 100 coins so I'm not going to bother bribing him.
- Katyusha: 1
- Charles: 50
- E: 0
- James: 49
Again, if it gets down to 3 people, the one in second will get none and the one in third will get whatever that third wants. You know that in a 2-player game the captain can steal all the gold?Charles, this puts you in second place - I can't distribute the coins so that the placement puts us closer without giving myself absolutely nothing, which is kind of going against wincon. A lead of 6 coins is also pretty easy to beat so I wouldn't advise getting greedy here because that leads to E getting the entirety of the coins since James has no reason to vote No to this proposition and Yes to the next.
James, if Charles decides to turn this down, he has to bribe you to make sure you vote yes since it is always within E's (or anyone in the third slot) best interest to vote no. Assuming he doesn't deliberately spite himself, he's either going to cut it 50/50 (which would be dumb since that puts his competition closer to him after I die) or give you less money.
This is still on the "third slot unlucky" thing that I just disproved.This is basically an "everyone wins" plan the best I can make it, except for E obviously but he can't really win as the third slot.