Page 9 of 13
Posted: Fri Sep 13, 2019 12:25 pm
by OkaPoka
Proposal P038 The Nomic Committee Room
Officially create a nomic thread called "The Committee Room" in Frogstar World B where discussion about creating extensive or small bills can be held before they are submitted to the floor for votes.
Posted: Fri Sep 13, 2019 12:30 pm
by OkaPoka
Okay I know this is a triple post but my thoughts are that eventually the committee room is going to take on more responsibilities if we grow to the point where we have >10 people playing
Posted: Fri Sep 13, 2019 12:44 pm
by Inferno390
Housekeeping
Wiki is updated
Posted: Fri Sep 13, 2019 2:32 pm
by NotMySpamAccount
Thebtrue hero of this thread. My vote for executive if we ever pass that bill.
Posted: Fri Sep 13, 2019 4:38 pm
by NotMySpamAccount
VOTE: Yea P027 my issues wwith this have been worked out. I don't love the game moderartor clause of sect. B, but I can live with it.
VOTE: Yea P033 essentially Nomic's no talking about ongoing games rule
VOTE: Yea P034 this is a good idea, setting up a framework, even before it's used, is key.
VOTE: Nay P035 I like the idea, but we don't need this yet. 8 players is less than a micro, and this thread hasn't been flooded yet. I'd be open to this once the game gets moving quicker.
Posted: Sat Sep 14, 2019 4:30 am
by James Brafin
VOTE: Nay P035
Why you trying to obsolete my thing mate?
Besides, adding an extra thread will make it too hard to keep track of things
Posted: Sat Sep 14, 2019 8:36 am
by NotMySpamAccount
In post 200, OkaPoka wrote:Proposal P038 The Nomic Committee Room
Officially create a nomic thread called "The Committee Room" in Frogstar World B where discussion about creating extensive or small bills can be held before they are submitted to the floor for votes.
This is actually P035, 035-037 were proposed unofficially so they haven't actually been proposed yet.
Posted: Sat Sep 14, 2019 8:40 am
by James Brafin
Oh
Correcting my vote.
Posted: Sat Sep 14, 2019 12:21 pm
by OkaPoka
uh ur proposal had many things in it so i was lazy and thought a more unofficial way of stopping clutter would be p cool
Posted: Sat Sep 14, 2019 12:30 pm
by James Brafin
It's actually 4 different proposals.
Posted: Sat Sep 14, 2019 12:32 pm
by OkaPoka
if u want to merge the lists with a committee idea and needing bills to go through review before voted on ill support ur bill
Posted: Sat Sep 14, 2019 12:36 pm
by James Brafin
Things being able to go through review is the eventual plan, yes.
I'm just doing it in smaller chunks so that we have structural stuff separate from the other stuff.
I'm not sure what good a "committee" would do us though. How would that work exactly? Is there even any structure in place for a committee?
Posted: Sat Sep 14, 2019 3:41 pm
by Formerfish
VOTE: Aye P009
VOTE: Aye P025
VOTE: Nay P026 if this is supposed to be r308 then i dont think we need it.
Change vote VOTE: Nay P028
VOTE: Aye P030
Posted: Mon Sep 16, 2019 6:25 am
by James Brafin
We need an inactivity rule.
Posted: Mon Sep 16, 2019 6:29 am
by OkaPoka
Autokick after not voting for a week?
Posted: Mon Sep 16, 2019 6:38 am
by Inferno390
There is already something for this
Posted: Mon Sep 16, 2019 6:46 am
by Formerfish
Posted: Mon Sep 16, 2019 6:52 am
by OkaPoka
oh
lol
Posted: Mon Sep 16, 2019 9:03 am
by Charles510
I'm still active.
Will vote more soon.
Posted: Mon Sep 16, 2019 12:17 pm
by Aronis
also still here just hoping my currency bill finally passes
Posted: Mon Sep 16, 2019 12:36 pm
by Formerfish
In post 219, Aronis wrote:
also still here just hoping my currency bill finally passes
I dont see a need for currency right now, i feel like its a step we are making too fast and for no real reason other than thats what a society eventually does.
Posted: Mon Sep 16, 2019 12:45 pm
by skitter30
In post 188, Formerfish wrote:Proposal P032:
Until a time where this body decides to allow communication outside of the public view, all communication between members shall be made in the open and public to each of us equally. Removal of this ban of outside communication must be repealed with a unanimous decision and nothing less. A single holdout would prevent outside communication.
I feel like this is kinda assumed?
Posted: Mon Sep 16, 2019 12:48 pm
by Formerfish
In post 221, skitter30 wrote: In post 188, Formerfish wrote:Proposal P032:
Until a time where this body decides to allow communication outside of the public view, all communication between members shall be made in the open and public to each of us equally. Removal of this ban of outside communication must be repealed with a unanimous decision and nothing less. A single holdout would prevent outside communication.
I feel like this is kinda assumed?
P032
Proposed By: NotMySpamAccount
Yea (3) - NotMySpamAccount, Formerfish, James
Nay (1) - Skitter
Any action not prohibited is permitted, unless it relates to official matters in the rules, in which case it is prohibited if not permitted.
Posted: Mon Sep 16, 2019 12:49 pm
by Formerfish
Would you rather assume or wake up one morning and find that a group has been talking on discord the whiole time organizing a coup to take power and turn our society into a dictatorship?
Posted: Mon Sep 16, 2019 12:50 pm
by Formerfish
I want any power grabs to be forced to be made in the open with all eyes able to see whats going on