[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/ext/alfredoramos/seometadata/event/listener.php on line 114: Undefined array key 10440682 [phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/ext/alfredoramos/seometadata/event/listener.php on line 114: Trying to access array offset on value of type null Newbie 1890 - Game Over - Mafiascum.net
For Newbie Games, which have a set format and experienced moderators. Archived during the 2023 queue overhaul.
84 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Micc
Micc
He/Him
Jack of All Trades
Micc
He/Him
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 7408
Joined: October 1, 2013
Pronoun: He/Him
Location: At Home
Post
Post #13 (isolation #0) » Sun Sep 16, 2018 4:12 am
Postby Micc »
Hey everyone!
I'm the designated Inexperienced Challenged player for this game. This means I have volunteered to be a resource that newer players can use to answer questions about game mechanics or theory. The guidelines to my role as an IC are laid out in the wiki article titled Being a good IC.
My goals for this game are 1) to steer the game in the direction of being a reasonable representation of what you can expect from other games on this site and 2) to win. I will primarily be playing to accomplish these goals, but am more than happy to jump into teacher/mentor mode when players ask me questions about game mechanics or theory.
In post 20, Egix96 wrote:
I'm not sure actually... Putting someone up to three votes before they've even entered the thread seems a bit excessive to me.
What makes you think a third vote would be excessive at this point?
Post
Post #37 (isolation #3) » Sun Sep 16, 2018 10:16 pm
Postby Micc »
In post 35, Egix96 wrote: Mala's first few posts read pretty towny to me so far so I think I'll take my vote off her for now...
Can you be more specific about what looks Town to you?
In post 36, Egix96 wrote:
Anyway: VOTE: Micc
Admittedly nothing in his ISO so far is really jumping out at me yet, but I think that having a third wagon will create more room for discussion.
Can you tell me more about why you think a third wagon will help here? You don’t seem to believe I’m scum any more than the rest of the players nor do you bring up discussion points yourself. So how’s this helping?
Post
Post #74 (isolation #6) » Mon Sep 17, 2018 11:01 am
Postby Micc »
VOTE: 2.718
Awkward entrance was awkward. Him having SE experience doesn't seem relevant to any of the conversations going on and Lafayette's post 49 is a weird choice for the one thing he comments on before being done. I'm also interested to hear what he thinks could be scummy about Egix cause all I see is townspewing from him so far.
Post
Post #79 (isolation #7) » Mon Sep 17, 2018 12:08 pm
Postby Micc »
I guess I don't find that post interesting at all. Talking about theory is really easy because your opinions about theory don't really change based on what alignment you are. So that's quite possibly the last post in the thread I'd use to try and for a read.
Post
Post #82 (isolation #8) » Mon Sep 17, 2018 12:45 pm
Postby Micc »
In post 80, Light Ethos wrote:I'll disagree with you on that, Micc. While yes, your beliefs about theory won't change from game to game, your willingness to go out and lay out the theory for Newbies likely would. Example: allowing a Newbie to hammer someone for you without announcing intent and then subtly directing town to a retaliation Lynch would be a good reason for scum to withhold that type of post. It's in town's interest to warn against that possibility.
Reads definitely can, should, and do change, but for now I read that post by Lafayette as coming from town more often than from scum.
If you're concerned about the possibility of someone hammering without intent, do you mind explaining why you didn't make a warning yourself? Perhaps you weren't willing to because you're not town? Perhaps I'm not town because I'm the IC and I didn't give these warnings?
Post
Post #87 (isolation #9) » Mon Sep 17, 2018 1:21 pm
Postby Micc »
In post 85, Light Ethos wrote:I think it's hard to make the case that Lafayette's post comes from
scum more often than from town or from
both equally often.
But this case is really easy to make.
Post's like Lafayette's 49 are beneficial to make as scum because a) they don't have to lie about their opinions on mafia theory and b) looking genuinely helpful often earns town reads like the one you gave. Of course Lafayette's 49 is also beneficial to make as town for the reasons you outlined. The point I'm trying to make being that Lafayette's post could easily go either way, which is exactly the kind of post I don't want to be forming reads from.
Post
Post #103 (isolation #11) » Mon Sep 17, 2018 3:45 pm
Postby Micc »
Don't mind that.
just look at the part where he calls my play pro town, says he doesn't want to start forming reads until page 7 and then calls everyone neutral. That's not a natural progression of thoughts to have in quick succession.
Post
Post #162 (isolation #14) » Tue Sep 18, 2018 8:07 am
Postby Micc »
In post 159, Malakittens wrote:let him comment on it and then you answer the question after please
Advice time: This is a good habit to get into for any time someone directly asks someone else a question. The person's answer becomes a lot less useful if you think it's been influenced by someone else's comments.
I don't have a problem with the push on mala. It's not the direction want to go right now but I could see coming back to it later.
Post
Post #185 (isolation #17) » Tue Sep 18, 2018 4:49 pm
Postby Micc »
I think if you consider 2.7's site activity outside of this game you can make a case for him doing the same things you're pushing mala for. Except mala has actually stated some opinions that matter and 2.7 hasn't really done that.
Egix slot is strong Town.
Lafayette, saudade and mala are moving out of the lynch pool for today but not quite there.
Everybody else needs to be sorted yet.
In post 222, Micc wrote:If he was scum he would have gotten anxious and self destructed in the mafia thread not here. It’s also pretty clear he wasn’t being coached.
What if he self-destructed in both?
You’re essentially arguing that his illogical behavior almost certainly followed a logical pattern. To me, the location of where he freaked out is far less interesting than the fact that he did in the first place.
I don't think there's anything illogical about his behavior. He signed up to play a game of mafia without really knowing what it was about. Stuff happened and he decided the game isn't for him and replaced out. That happens all the time.
But the pushes he was making while he was here and his reaction to being pushed are classic examples of brand new town player. I don't really know what else to say about it besides that I've moderated and played in enough newbies over the last 4 years to feel pretty confident about understanding the mindset of a brand new player. When brand new players meet opposition for the first time as town they sometimes freak out. When their scum they know it's eventually coming and expect it which leads to way less of a freak out - especially in the game thread.
Slot is town for today. I'm willing to reconsider at a different point but day 1 is all about narrowing the lynch pool as quickly as possible. I think I've got my lynch pool narrowed down to acrimoniusalpaca/SuperfluousNinja/2 718281828459/Light Ethos. That's contingent on the fact that I only skimmed the 2 pages that you all made since I last posted and have to come back to it because had a really hard time following the conversation because pronouns are hard.
Do you agree with what I wrote so far? I would always value constructive criticism.
1. Yeah. Your analysis doesn't look like something that came from an hour of looking at the thread. In that time I'd think you'd have come across the answer to number 2 for the large majority of the playerlist. I'm also concerned that you don't seem to understand the case against you, nor are you making an effort understand and debunk it. Seems like you'd rather hand wave it away by complaining about not having enough time to play a game you subbed into.
2. Post 276 has a pretty good summary of my reads as does post 218.
3. nah. I disagree with 2 of your 3 reads and none of the reasons you gave are things I think are notably indicative of alignment.
Post
Post #286 (isolation #25) » Wed Sep 19, 2018 2:44 pm
Postby Micc »
In post 280, 2 718281828459 wrote:In fact, I put Saudade as a 3, but seeing the comment about Saudade pretending to be Mala and failing made me take off a quarter point.
Like I don't even know what this is a reference to and I iso'd both and control+F searched for the other's name.
Post
Post #326 (isolation #27) » Thu Sep 20, 2018 10:32 am
Postby Micc »
In post 312, Lafayette wrote:Which do you agree with? I can't even make sense of the Egix one.
Uhh, him and I are both reading mala as town. I thought I had stated reads my reads pretty clearly so I didn't expect that to be hard to hash out.
In post 315, 2 718281828459 wrote:I mean, most people are either reading me as scum because of either (A) the joke post or (B) not having good quality posts for the most part. And my post quality will increase -- I just had a bit too much those three days, and since they are behind me now, I can start being more productive.
My biggest problem is that your reads and pushes don't line up with what I'd expect from town player who is short on time. The things you chose to comment on first aren't the major topics of discussion or the things I find important. The large majority of the reads I'm seeing from you are based off things I would never factor into my reads. My push has nothing to do with the joke post and general quality doesn't quite describe it either. It's more so that everything you're posting looks unnatural/fake/contrived - whatever you want to call it.
Do me a favor and drop the in depth ISO dives and just read the game thread in sequential order or at least as much of the recent posts as you have time for. Follow the references and quotes back to the original posts if you don't understand the context. Then give us 2-3 sentences worth of explanation for your read on each player.
predit: and you posted more as I was typing this and/or distracted with work. Looks like you're moving in the right direction but I want to understand the saudade vote better. What isn't he doing that you think he should be if he's town. How does not doing those things help him win as scum?
Post
Post #327 (isolation #28) » Thu Sep 20, 2018 10:39 am
Postby Micc »
VOTE: acrimoniusalpaca
2.7 deserves some space and the Saudade wagon is not where I want to be. We need more from alpaca and I was disappointed to see he's been online since his last post when I just looked.
Why does any player deserve space? This sounds like you aren't confident in your read, or like you wanted to start a distancing wagon on 2.718. Your previous post says that you find that his actions are not what you expect from a town player. You then switch your vote to someone inactive, saying that 2.718 deserves some space. What has 2.718 done to deserve space? If you're unsatisfied with his response, why should he be given a pass?
That being said, pressure on Alpaca, Malakittens, or Egix's slot is something I can get behind too because they haven't done much in terms of proactivity.
Because until the mod flips their role everybody has a non zero chance of being town and town players deserve a chance to be heard.
If you're not giving your scum reads room to say what they want to say or making an open minded effort to listen then you're tunneling. I want to hear 2.7's thoughts on the game not him defending himself from being pressured so my vote change reflects that.
Our reads seem to be lining up. That combining with my familiarity of you means you're not in the lynch pool for today although I wish you were a little more open about reasons behind your reads.
Post
Post #358 (isolation #31) » Thu Sep 20, 2018 2:14 pm
Postby Micc »
In post 348, Light Ethos wrote:and the only way to truly compel someone to speak is under the threat of the hammer.
Yeah, I learned the game under this mindset too. The more I play/mod/spectate the more I see the value in working with people and not against them - even your scum reads.
It's like when your parents threaten punishment for not cleaning your room and you get in a big fight because you'd rather they talk to you like a human being.
I don't want to get in a fight with 2.7 about whether he's scum or not. I want to hear what he has to say about the rest of the game. it's probably going to be easier for him to do that while not under threat of the hammer.
Not actually sure what you're asking here but I feel like I understand what mala's reads are. I lack some understanding about how she is making those reads.
In post 367, Micc wrote:If you're voting someone you best be ready to speak to why.
I 100% disagree with this statement. People are absolutely allowed to cast their votes for their own reasons and do NOT need to explain exactly what they are doing with their votes. In my case you foiled my strategy and I'm still kind of irked about that.
I mean if you’re actively pressuring someone about their play being scummy I’m going to be mindful of that and probably let you do your thing. But you can’t put a vote on somebody and expect it’s going to change their posting style.
Post
Post #459 (isolation #37) » Sun Sep 23, 2018 7:23 am
Postby Micc »
In post 276, Micc wrote:Slot is town for today. I'm willing to reconsider at a different point but day 1 is all about narrowing the lynch pool as quickly as possible. I think I've got my lynch pool narrowed down to acrimoniusalpaca/SuperfluousNinja/2 718281828459/Light Ethos. That's contingent on the fact that I only skimmed the 2 pages that you all made since I last posted and have to come back to it because had a really hard time following the conversation because pronouns are hard.
There was this too but tbh thats farther back than i realized. Ninja, you're trending town because I thought your post 398/398 were a pure frustrated town reaction that would be hard to fake as scum. Your reads are decently far off mine tho so that still gives me pause.
TheHolySpirit's replace in posts were garbage and my immediate reaction was to push that. I realized after making the vote that the replacement was for the Egix slot that I had been town reading but that didn't stop me from wanting to pressure the weak replace in.
I'm probably lynching between 2.7 and alien/alpaca slot today. I could be persuaded towards Light Ethos but I don't think that's actually on the table with where peoples reads are at. Alien needs to get here and make some posts. Hopefully they look good because I'm thinking 2.7 is the right lynch but it's hard to justify over a slot that hasn't contributed anything to the game.
In post 480, Micc wrote:those things do appear to be true. Do those things impact your reads?
Were you asking me this question? You said this after I summarized the voting situation on 2.718. No, that doesn’t impact my reads...not sure why it would?
You seemed eager to talk to literally anyone about anything. I assumed by posting those things in the thread you had something you wanted to say about them - or at least that they meant something to how you're thinking about the game.
In post 489, 2 718281828459 wrote:@Micc: That question is to whoever knows. Primarily Light Ethos, but unless this whole deal is something entirely made up, then someone else should also know what I would be missing.
I mean I don't really know what the contradiction is either, but I didn't think anyone was pushing contradiction in their case against mala. /Shrug i guess.
In post 489, 2 718281828459 wrote:I would do more ISO reads but every time I have tried that sort of thing (i.e. looking at every ISO and coming up with a read) my posts get heavy criticism for not being helpful or something. For me at least, this game seems to have a very low signal to noise ratio, and it is making forming legit reads quite difficult.
Have you tried stating some your opinions instead of asking questions to no one in particular or posting summaries or things people already read? How about you give me the one thing youre most confident about in this game?
Post
Post #554 (isolation #46) » Mon Sep 24, 2018 3:38 am
Postby Micc »
In post 531, SuperfluousNinja wrote:I would say Alien’s contributions have moved him well out of lynch territory. Does that make Light Ethos your #2 scumspect then??
What’s your reasoning for suspecting Light Ethos? You seem to be the only one who does, so I’m curious where this is coming from.
He hasn’t stood out as Town to me. I haven’t liked his reads all that much. Even in areas where we were voting together he was the person on the wagon I thought was most likely to be scum. Sure he can be #2 by default, but I’m pretty set on 1.7 right now.
In post 545, SuperfluousNinja wrote:Let’s see who I can get to join this wagon. It’s for a guy who has just been obstinate, uncooperative, combative, and pretty much the exact opposite of what he promised to be at the start of the game with no logical explanation as to why. Not to mention his post count is substantially lower than the far more obvious townies.
VOTE: Micc
Wow that’s harsh. Do you have examples posts of me of me doing these things that you can pull out? Cause this just looks like you grabbing a bunch of accusations out of a hat to see how I react.
Post
Post #555 (isolation #47) » Mon Sep 24, 2018 3:46 am
Postby Micc »
I should also say that with under 2 days left we should have an intent to hammer already and any of you on your own vanity push need to either come back to reality or make an incredibly compelling case for why people should join you. This lynch appears to be between 2.7 and mala. All I really have to say about mala is that my understanding of her meta/personality is that she doesn’t fake this town slip if she’s scum. Also she’s as stubbornly passive in the early parts of every other game as she is here. Let’s get that 2.7 wagon back to l-1 and get a claim.
In post 222, Micc wrote:If he was scum he would have gotten anxious and self destructed in the mafia thread not here. It’s also pretty clear he wasn’t being coached.
Post
Post #558 (isolation #48) » Mon Sep 24, 2018 4:21 am
Postby Micc »
Yeah I don’t feel bad about any of those posts except maybe the one where I brushed off talking about my reads. You seem to be taking my confidence that I know what I’m doing and my willingness to offer advice about how this game works as me being a jerk. You’re welcome to think what you want I guess but woofty finding the right balance between playing/teaching/learning myself and tying them together isn’t easy. I do what I can.
Can you explain why doing these things helps me win as scum because I don’t see any of them as particularly scummy. But I guess I’m biased.
Post
Post #560 (isolation #49) » Mon Sep 24, 2018 4:40 am
Postby Micc »
So how does me suggesting that anyone who puts down a vote should be ready to explain it willfully resist moving the game forward?
How does suggesting that stating ones opinions is more productive than asking questions to no one in particular willfully resist moving the game forward?
How does suggesting that being the only person on a wagon with <2 days isn’t productive willfully resist moving the game forward?
Like these are all instances of me giving advice to people specifically because it will help them play better and thus move the game forward. I’m sorry if you didn’t like the tone of my posts, but I think you’re silly for pushing them as scummy here.
Post
Post #571 (isolation #50) » Mon Sep 24, 2018 5:07 am
Postby Micc »
In post 564, SuperfluousNinja wrote:I don’t think that 2 days is too little time to consider anything else. Though maybe at the pace at which people participate, it is a limited amount of time?
Think about all the things that can happen before a lynch. Player A goes to l-1. Someone gives intent. Player A claims power. Everyone needs to counterclaim/not counterclaim. Player B goes to L-1. Someone gives intent. Player B claims. Hopefully at that point you have a lynch but tbh Player B might claim power too and then it’s a real mess.
I’m telling you, and it’s a fact not an opinion, that it takes more than 2 days to go through this process. We’re probably getting some sort of an extension if THS is replaced, but that doesn’t mean we have forever.
Post
Post #578 (isolation #51) » Mon Sep 24, 2018 7:45 am
Postby Micc »
Well I'm town reading mala so I didn't like your push there. Your 2.7 read seemed to be primarily based on not liking 2.7 comment on Saudade's joke and I think thats a non factor despite liking 2.7 as a scum read. When wagons build quickly one of the things I ask myself is which vote looks like scum piling on for a mislynch and I think that vote is you for the early 2.7 wagon that went to L-1 and for the mala wagon that went to L-2. Even the really early Egix wagon although to a lesser extent.
In post 127, Huntress wrote:2 718281828459 (4) - Micc, Saudade, SuperfluousNinja, Light Ethos
In post 421, Huntress wrote:Malakittens (3) - Lafayette, Light Ethos, SuperfluousNinja
Post
Post #583 (isolation #52) » Mon Sep 24, 2018 10:26 am
Postby Micc »
uhh I highly doubt that. If you have a theory belief that town players should give a warning when making a L-1 then you'll do it as scum to maintain your town meta.
Playing at as scum at a high level means mimicking your town play not tricking newbies into bad hammers because they're not paying attention to the votecount.
Post
Post #598 (isolation #55) » Mon Sep 24, 2018 6:42 pm
Postby Micc »
Ok. You’re now on record as having said that you would not announce an L-1 you made as scum. It’s out there for everyone to see. Once this game is over people will even be able to link it and use it as evidence. Does that change whether you will announce or not when you put a player to L-1 as scum?
In post 643, Micc wrote:ninja, what part of "I'm going to let him speak to the hammer before posting my thoughts" did you not understand?
I'm not sure you're even talking to the right person here? I don't even understand who "him" is in this context. Who are you letting speak to Alien? How did I get in the way of it? How did I get in YOUR way of it? What did I say to you to get in the way of you doing this? I'm extremely confused by this hostility here.
When you comment on things like you did in 641 youre giving the person who the whole game wants to hear from information about how you expect them to justify their actions. It's like saying hey I think you're scummy for doing this thing, but if your reasoning is blahblabla then I guess its not so bad. They're going to come to the thread and use blahblabla as justification but the rest of us never know what the true reaction would have been.
I'm sorry if my post came off as being dickish. I was generally annoyed and wanted to convey that in the 30 seconds I have to write posts between doing work things, but my intention for that post is never for it to be taken as a personal attack.
Post
Post #741 (isolation #60) » Fri Sep 28, 2018 5:57 am
Postby Micc »
Pretty sure the best way to proceed here is mass claim because that nearly guarantees we lynch the correct half of alien/saudade today. That leaves us with a 4v1 which is a decent place to be and depending on the setup might have a confirmed town.