Newbie 1896 - Cats, whambulances & more. [Game Over]
-
-
Ariane Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 341
- Joined: October 10, 2018
- Location: Australia (GMT +10)
-
-
Ariane Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 341
- Joined: October 10, 2018
- Location: Australia (GMT +10)
-
-
Ariane Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 341
- Joined: October 10, 2018
- Location: Australia (GMT +10)
o.o these are very early very certain scumreads—I'll see if you backtrack later in the thread (just sort of posting as I go) but yeahIn post 51, CheekyTeeky wrote:
How was calling out what everything was thinking risking the game state anymore than what shortaru was doing? Your concern means you think I'm right which means it was already outted.In post 48, theslimer3 wrote:I understand that you're in a teaching role per say, but I dont think it's a good idea to risk the game state on a quick lesson
You all are being melodramatic because I've taken an unconventional approach which has resulted in one scum taking the easy push bait and perhaps another scum early role fishing.
(Also, what do you mean by 'unconventional approach'? Sorry if you answer this later on)-
-
Ariane Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 341
- Joined: October 10, 2018
- Location: Australia (GMT +10)
This seems disingenuous, it's pretty obvious they were talking about hypoclaimingIn post 65, implosion wrote:
Are you advocating that people should keep their reads close to their chests? If so I have a number of canned arguments I can give in favor of the reverse~shortaru wrote:When I'm Mafia, I'm very interested in knowing town's reads because that helps me decide who the biggest threats are, so... I respectfully disagree.-
-
Ariane Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 341
- Joined: October 10, 2018
- Location: Australia (GMT +10)
This is a bit weird—I found it fairly clear why short shifted, he earlier said that if Brox and stanley cleaned their acts up he'd be up for a slimer push in 72In post 96, Emyrs Baneheart wrote:I agree with stan1ey on this one. From slimer3's actions, it would seem like he's just trying out RQS and regardless of how useful it was - that was hardly scummy IMO. I am however curious to see what changed shortaru's mind to vote for slimer when he was of the opinion slimer was NAI in a couple of posts back.
On a side note, genuinely new to the game and was wondering what are the merits to RVS/RQS methods of starting the game when both are perceived to not generate much info?
Emrys hasn't really posted enough to get a strong read on them but tbh I'm not a fan of their two posts
@Emrys come back! Is that paragraph the only 'thoughts' you had? What's your reads?
Honestly so far I'm not getting the strong town read on Cheeky—shortaru seems to suddenly be ok with her after their interaction but I don't see a strong case, I'll read her in more detail later-
-
Ariane Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 341
- Joined: October 10, 2018
- Location: Australia (GMT +10)
-
-
Ariane Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 341
- Joined: October 10, 2018
- Location: Australia (GMT +10)
First reactions I don't like Emrys (though difficult to tell) implosion
Slimer has been talked about loads, finding it difficult to tell. I'm not sure I like implosion's push on him (for reasons I'll explain shortly)—the criticism that he was putting us back into RVS is a bit weird since it seems to me like a few people were doing that (looking at Emrys to an extent, and someone else I don't remember). Could be scum but I'm also suspicious of the push on him. I buy the staying on the edges, but he appears to be flaking atm. It's been over two days since he posted so I'm not voting him (or Emrys) till they come back/are replaced-
-
Ariane Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 341
- Joined: October 10, 2018
- Location: Australia (GMT +10)
VOTE: implosion
So he doesn't really have any reads he's posted as far as I can see, apart from his push on slimer and his town read on short, but even then he said
He did also say recently:In post 90, implosion wrote: All of this is very, very minor, to be clear. But it's something.
I lean slightly town on shortaru as well.
but what does that even mean? (actually having trouble understanding this one, and ideally I shouldn't have to cos you should be being clear)—are you saying that everyone that's more active than Brox is "pretty likely town"? ThatIn post 178, implosion wrote:What are people's takes on Broxul right now? He's the most active slot that I don't have at pretty likely town right now. His last reads list was pretty much echoing the table (though that isn't necessarily bad).seemsto be what you're saying, but then that means you have every player that's posted more than 10 times as likely town, which I feel makes it kind of easy for you if you're just scumreading lurkers/people who seem to be flaking
(Also maybe I'm missing this but I don't get what "echoing the table" means)
PEdit: Ah true, my bad, that was Cheeky in 71-
-
Ariane Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 341
- Joined: October 10, 2018
- Location: Australia (GMT +10)
I've just gone back through implosion's ISO and seen that he does have a read on stan, but
The main thing I'm worried about (and shortaru, you should I think pay attention given your post 100) is that sure, he did a push on slimer, but he hasn't really followed it up, nor has he unvoted. When short "called him out on it" (100) he gave a bit of a case, but then hasn't really mentioned slimer since...even though his vote hasn't changed
His reads are either unspecified (re. above post), or concurring with short's mostly (79; 129)
Basically I'm seeing one proper push, which was after being called out for not pushing, and then the stuff after is maybekindascumhunting, but without much heart in it-
-
Ariane Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 341
- Joined: October 10, 2018
- Location: Australia (GMT +10)
Hm some fair points there, from both of you
That point about lurkers is also fair
I'm gonna need to return after work and reread, replacing in is a different beast.
For now, reads (mostly gut):
Townish
shortaru
k9
Scummish
Emrys
implosion
Slimer
Null
everyone else
each tier is sort of an amorphous blob, though I like implosion's last post (and like I said, both you and aru made some fair points, which I'll consider more when I come back). I don't really see the point of voting slimer or Emrys when they're not here.
PEdit: Yeah like I said above I'll reread/consider when I get back (and check your reads throughout). A more in-depth explanation on Cheeky would be great-
-
Ariane Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 341
- Joined: October 10, 2018
- Location: Australia (GMT +10)
Why I like k9 (from his one post lol)
In post 139, k9soccer wrote:Cheeky has total innocence, I have to say, for going after stan1ey. Stan1ey comes out of nowhere and says that he scumreads Cheeky; Cheeky gets upset because of this. Stan, buddy, you gotta understand that it's expected of someone to be upset for calling them scum- no matter if they're mafia or town. Let's say, for instance, that shortaru IS scum. What benefit would he get for calling Cheeky town and for Cheeky to actually be maf. The first step of mafia is to Appeal to Emotion. He would, of course, call a townie a town. He would have failed his job already if he called another scum town. He seems way too much of a good player for that to happen. That leads me to my main point.
Shortaru, why are you still anti-stan1ey when he is on the defense? As much as I want to believe you are town, this just doesn't make sense to me. He's making attacks out of desperation and doesn't have very good points. Neither of you are trying to think in the minds of the other. Cheeky thinks that you may be trying to work in matrix-style ways BECAUSE mafia knows who town is. He calls both you and Cheeky town because he DISLIKES being attacked. That's why it makes no sense to try to fight him any more. He can scum read whoever he likes, and have no repercussions. In fact, wouldn't YOU, as a townie, want to protect someone you view as a fellow townie. Your claims tailor to you. I would be willing to say that you are a bit of a survivalist. You can say that you are trying to 'help' him see in a better perspective that is for town. However, if you wanted to do that, you would have to try to think in his perspective- which, obviously, you don't understand. My question is why, are you trying to have such a clean and spotless reputation. You try to fix any mistakes made, and you don't really make any risks. Trying to play safe could mean that you don't want to get lynched or killed by maf, but you have such a pressuring way of posting, that if you don't get lynched you would almost definitely get crushed by scum the first night. I would like to hear your thinking, please, if you will.
Coming right out and saying "Cheeky has total innocence" is super bold, I'd expect scum to be a bit more tentative. he also backs it up with reasons, and although the hypothetical is a bit of a mess structurally I think I see towny reasoning
With the second paragraph there's also a town motivation I think, in that k9 isactuallytrying to confirm/get a read throughdirectlyengaging another player. I'm not sure I dig the kind of personality reading thing he's doing, but this feels too inter-player engaged, and town motivated, to be scum imo-
-
Ariane Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 341
- Joined: October 10, 2018
- Location: Australia (GMT +10)
-
-
Ariane Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 341
- Joined: October 10, 2018
- Location: Australia (GMT +10)
This recent apology thing seems weird...particularly since Cheeky said:
Which means (I assume) it's ongoing, which means it's a really new town indicator, which has presumably only happened onceIn post 239, CheekyTeeky wrote:I can't give you an example of this due to site rules. I will do if that changes. But to me it's a town tell.-
-
Ariane Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 341
- Joined: October 10, 2018
- Location: Australia (GMT +10)
re k9 again, just browsing back over the thread and came across this which I'd overlooked before, I also agree with this post (similarly to the above with the messy hypothetical)
In post 170, shortaru wrote:
Even so, but I'd still not be all that interested in a k9soccer lynch at this point.In post 168, Broxul wrote: No reads on k9soccer, Emrys Baneheart, and aslightrain due to lack of content.
If scum had gone to the trouble of making that ketchup wall post, I feel like they'd have been more careful not to contradict themselves.
Personally, I don't view cognitive dissonance as a scum tell in situations like that. He seemed to be trying to put the puzzle pieces together and getting a few pieces mixed up. Scum already has the picture.-
-
Ariane Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 341
- Joined: October 10, 2018
- Location: Australia (GMT +10)
-
-
Ariane Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 341
- Joined: October 10, 2018
- Location: Australia (GMT +10)
General thoughts:
Liking implosion better these last few pages, particularly in that he's continuing to push at slimer now that he's responding (which I mentioned in 194 that I didn't like that); implosion following up now that slimer's posting again adds credence to his defence that he didn't have anything else to say in the intervening time
UNVOTE: implosion
@Slimer are you sure you
? Unless I'm missing something, the only townread you've really posted is shortaru in 209—can you elaborate on where the other players are at for you?In post 227, theslimer3 wrote:dont currently have any scum leads but I'm sure theres some opportunistic scum on my wagon
re. Brox, I can see where implosion's coming from regarding 212, although his explanation of it in 219 is decent, I guess.
@Brox, any luck with this:
?In post 168, Broxul wrote:So that's basically a town or slight town read on almost everyone who's been participating. Maybe I need to refine what exactly I'm looking for in a how a scum would be playing the game.
How are you planning on refining it? Also, is your reading of shortaru changing atm?-
-
Ariane Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 341
- Joined: October 10, 2018
- Location: Australia (GMT +10)
Best of luck!In post 254, implosion wrote:I'm going to be potentially a bit checked-out from thinking deeply about this game for the next two days - I'm taking the GRE tomorrow, and then the GRE math subject test on Saturday.-
-
Ariane Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 341
- Joined: October 10, 2018
- Location: Australia (GMT +10)
Sorry for posting so late, busy few days at work, will read the thread in more detail tonight
Don't have much of a read on Brox yet, so first point of call will be to go through his iso. Although regarding the post above, where he reads short as scum (which I think is rare ITT, though I'll need to go back and check)—I'm not sure whether to read that as towny for scumreading someone that others haven't, or scummy for doing it as soon as short voted him-
-
Ariane Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 341
- Joined: October 10, 2018
- Location: Australia (GMT +10)
-
-
Ariane Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 341
- Joined: October 10, 2018
- Location: Australia (GMT +10)
-
-
Ariane Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 341
- Joined: October 10, 2018
- Location: Australia (GMT +10)
"That slot" was referring to your slot.In post 339, Mewtaph wrote:In post 331, Ariane wrote:Don't have much of a read on Brox yet, so first point of call will be to go through his iso.
You are being inconsistent. You say you don't have much of a read on Brox yet, but two posts after you say that I am strengthening your townread on that slot, implying that you have a townread on them. Broxul is scum. If you want to ISO them, go ahead. Look at their ISO. All of their posts look spotless unless you see it context however. Like I suggested earlier, go to Broxul's first ISO post then reread the rest of the thread from that point onwards. It is the textbook "I am scum, and I want to fade into the background" play.In post 333, Ariane wrote:And mew is strengthening my townread on that slot-
-
Ariane Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 341
- Joined: October 10, 2018
- Location: Australia (GMT +10)
-
-
Ariane Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 341
- Joined: October 10, 2018
- Location: Australia (GMT +10)
-
-
Ariane Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 341
- Joined: October 10, 2018
- Location: Australia (GMT +10)
In post 481, shortaru wrote:
If Stan was scum, he would not have done anything to bring even a little negative attention off me because he wants me dead.In post 478, gigabyteTroubadour wrote:if you're talking about 310 i feel like that's kind of immediately thrown away by the next part, plus i can easily see that as sowing the seeds for a future push.
Ah yeah sorry, been a busy few days at uni/work. Cleared up a bit nowIn post 531, CheekyTeeky wrote:Ariane is pretty quiet which is unnerving me after the big spurts of input.
Pedit no Kat is Giga-
-
Ariane Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 341
- Joined: October 10, 2018
- Location: Australia (GMT +10)
-
-
Ariane Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 341
- Joined: October 10, 2018
- Location: Australia (GMT +10)
I wasn't comfortable with Emyrs from when I first read, but a lot of this wagon seems to be due to lurking/potensh dropping out due drawing a mafia slot (267), rather than his actual content—sure, there's little of it, but reasoning like this seems to be the major reason he's being voted for, and that doesn't really tell us much about who's on/off the wagon
Short has posted this, and said some few things about Emyrs being a scumread earlier, but others seem to be jumping on the wagon recently, without much reasoning than 'eh not posting much'In post 446, shortaru wrote: I don't want to lynch implosion until d2 at the earliest, but he's a scumread.
Emrys' few posts were lynchworthy, imho.
PEdit: hmm it's not like he stopped scumreading you at that point, in fact he increased it in the very same post:
In post 310, stan1ey wrote:
...
I still think Cheeky and Short are scummy. Cheeky a lot less and Shortaru a lot more now however.-
-
Ariane Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 341
- Joined: October 10, 2018
- Location: Australia (GMT +10)
-
-
Ariane Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 341
- Joined: October 10, 2018
- Location: Australia (GMT +10)
(What's LHF, by the way? I think...Cheeky? said it somewhere)
implosion's still kind of weirding me out. I know he's said he's not super focused on the game rn due to GREs, but the vagueness isn't helping given that my original criticism of him was lack of (explicit) reads. The clearest he's been is when responding to me voting him...I'm finding it difficult to tell given he's zoned out of the game for the time being, but the way I see it he's gone from *vagueness*--->my vote--->*non-vagueness*--->my unvote--->*vagueness*
PEdit: I'm not super sure I want to, I'm not loving Emyrs for my own reasons. What I'd like is some actual reasoning from people who're willing to lynch him, other than 'lurker!'-
-
Ariane Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 341
- Joined: October 10, 2018
- Location: Australia (GMT +10)
-
-
Ariane Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 341
- Joined: October 10, 2018
- Location: Australia (GMT +10)
-
-
Ariane Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 341
- Joined: October 10, 2018
- Location: Australia (GMT +10)
-
-
Ariane Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 341
- Joined: October 10, 2018
- Location: Australia (GMT +10)
-
-
Ariane Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 341
- Joined: October 10, 2018
- Location: Australia (GMT +10)
Ah ok, cheers
Yeah. Mew mentioned a lot of it in 552, but in addition to that his most recent post focuses on a) responding to being called out for not posting/having no reads, and b) the cop thing. I'm not sure how alignment indicative the former is (although perhaps a slight scum lean?), but spending the Marjorie of a post on a relatively contained issue like that strikes me as a way to avoid commenting on/engaging with the thread at large, which I find scummyIn post 565, Mewtaph wrote:
This suggests that you have at least a scum lean on Emyrs and you have reasoning to go along with it. Mind sharing with the board?In post 547, Ariane wrote:PEdit: I'm not super sure I want to, I'm not loving Emyrs for my own reasons. What I'd like is some actual reasoning from people who're willing to lynch him, other than 'lurker!'-
-
Ariane Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 341
- Joined: October 10, 2018
- Location: Australia (GMT +10)
The thing I don't/didn't like is scumreading someone for not posting or flaking (particularly the latter), cos I don't really think it's alignment indicative. Like there might be strategic non posting (eg waiting it out if the heat is on you and coming back when it stops), but that doesn't strike me as what Em is doing.
Mew does perhaps have a point about the implication of Em's last post implying he's been reading the thread, hadn't noticed that-
-
Ariane Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 341
- Joined: October 10, 2018
- Location: Australia (GMT +10)
To clarify, a) above, when I say maybe a scum lean I mean that responding only once you're called out /asked to seems to show little initiative, making it easier for scum to play. Could also be lazy town though, hence just a lean
Pedit: hm maybe, depends on whether you read it as 'I didn't have reads at the time I posted' or 'I haven't had reads and that's why I haven't been posting'
ppedit that edit was for short re short 'it's a stretch'-
-
Ariane Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 341
- Joined: October 10, 2018
- Location: Australia (GMT +10)
Ok. So
Implosion, I find it weird that you keep insisting that Slimer/replacement flipping red clears you, andthereforeit's the same thing in reverse? Like I'm not following your reasoning at all there. It seems obvious to me that even logically that isn't true (A -> B does not necessarily equal B -> A)
Tbh generally I'm finding his posts difficult to get along with.
@Cheeky, finding it difficult to get hard reads, but I'm not up at all for lynching shortaru or Mew (will fight for this). Implosion I've been uncomfortable with for ages, and while he improved a bit (for a short while), his recent stuff has been more... I dunno, like both looking not much like scumhunting, but also like very vague.
429 is particularly egregious, as is 617. The former a) says 'I'm ok with an Emyrs lynch because lurkers', b) immediately qualifies that statement with 'oh but he might be getting replaced', c) doesn't actually vote for Emyrs. Like I said above, I think lurking isn't alignment-indicative, and it's a super easy way for scum to support a wagon without investing substantial reasons/work
(Actually, if either Implosion or Emyrs flips scum, I might be looking at the other. This weird kind of half suspicion, without reasoning, without voting, strikes me the wrong way.)
So I'd be happy with an Implosion lynch. I'm not liking the tone of his play still, and I'm finding it difficult to see a point to his abstruseness with reads earlier (discussed when I first replaced in, I think)
...actually, is he usually this vague about reads? Just had a quick glance at that game he linked earlier, and tbh he's being a hell of a lot clearer there, at least in tone. (Not gonna read the entire thing, but)-
-
Ariane Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 341
- Joined: October 10, 2018
- Location: Australia (GMT +10)
-
-
Ariane Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 341
- Joined: October 10, 2018
- Location: Australia (GMT +10)
As I've said above I haven't been liking Emyrs, but given time close to deadline I'm finding myself feeling "fuck it, let's just lynch him now", but I'm pretty sure that's for impatience/worry about deadline or replacement reasons. And I'm trying to avoid that cos I don't like the play, and I've called others out on that same thing.
The issue is it's difficult to separate the emotional response I'm having from what I'm actually thinking of Emyrs. I'm pretty certain I still find him scummy, but I'm being careful about it as my frustration might be influencing that—ie I might be cherrypicking or whatever.
Although, that's perhaps unlikely, given how little there is to cherrypick from.
Sorry, I know I'm being waffly here :/-
-
Ariane Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 341
- Joined: October 10, 2018
- Location: Australia (GMT +10)
-
-
Ariane Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 341
- Joined: October 10, 2018
- Location: Australia (GMT +10)
Fuck it, for now:
VOTE: Implosion
The main reason I unvoted was because it seemed like he was scumhunting more, and I don't think that's that true any longer. Seems like he stopped as soon as my pressure was off. Also, it wasn't that much pressure—pretty much just me. If it were gonna affect his play s.t. he started being clearer, I find it weird that such miniscule pressure would get town to briefly share reads and then fade back into vagueness, particularly for a more experienced player
that red/green flip assertion was super weird.
If he's lynched, and flips red, I wanna look at Emyrs' replacement-
-
Ariane Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 341
- Joined: October 10, 2018
- Location: Australia (GMT +10)
-
-
Ariane Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 341
- Joined: October 10, 2018
- Location: Australia (GMT +10)
-
-
Ariane Goon
-
-
Ariane Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 341
- Joined: October 10, 2018
- Location: Australia (GMT +10)
-
-
Ariane Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 341
- Joined: October 10, 2018
- Location: Australia (GMT +10)
-
-
Ariane Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 341
- Joined: October 10, 2018
- Location: Australia (GMT +10)
I didn't get the whole thing on slimer really, nothing about it struck me as *that* scummy. I got more out of the ensuing discussion, it's where my first uncomfortability (sic?) with Implosion came from. Slimer's play I dunno if I'd call town, but proooobbably leaning that way?
Giga is like gone, his posting when he was here was unremarkable to me, like there was a lot of it but not much content,
The lack of content would read scummy to me (that is, the lots of posting but lack of content), but also at the time (iirc) we were close-ish to deadline before it got extended, and the fact that Giga didn't jump on a wagon—particularly on Emyrs who would have been easy-ish to do—well, I guess that kind of balances it out?
Updated list of reads in case I'm lynched, town-->scum:
Mew
Short
Cheeky
stan/Brox
Giga
Implosion/Emyrs
None of the first three are gonna be lynched today so I'm feeling pretty good about that. I mean I won't be if I'm lynched lol, but otherwise I think the right track is happening
Cheeky has gone up a bit largely because of her logic making sense, although there's areas where I'm still unconfortable with her posting (eg. the okayness with what seems like compromise/lynching lurkers or whatever—like if she thinks I'm scum she should probably be pushing harder for a lynch on me, not being like "ehhhh I'd be ok with FF if he doesn't vote" )
PEdit: mostly in response to Mew's q about Giga, not to the sudden amount of posts following that-
-
Ariane Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 341
- Joined: October 10, 2018
- Location: Australia (GMT +10)
(sorry, that should be implosion/FF)
Reason I don't like FF any more than I liked Emyrs:
He'ssoself-focused. Almost every post of his is talking about himself/others' reads on him.
He also looks at me a bit, and though I disagree with those posts they seem to be decent-ish I guess, but even then more than half his stuff is defending himself, and while there was pressure on him this feels like an overreaction, particularly when most of his 'scumhunting' seems to take a relative backseat-
-
Ariane Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 341
- Joined: October 10, 2018
- Location: Australia (GMT +10)
-
-
Ariane Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 341
- Joined: October 10, 2018
- Location: Australia (GMT +10)
-
-
Ariane Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 341
- Joined: October 10, 2018
- Location: Australia (GMT +10)
-
-
Ariane
-
-
Ariane Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 341
- Joined: October 10, 2018
- Location: Australia (GMT +10)
-
-
Ariane Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 341
- Joined: October 10, 2018
- Location: Australia (GMT +10)
Yeah well I figured that, but I don't see it at all
749 is bad, from musing on the philosophy of the game to "I'm town!" to "tell me your read onme"
750 he says
in terms of 'being scumread' which almost directly contradicts the implications in 749 where......like, heIn post 750, Formerfish wrote:Do you think I should care?obviouslycares
756, 763, 765—nothing of his own content, asking questions, which sure is a good thing and better than just defending but not particularly town-read-worthy imo
769 = ok cool Ariane's scum, that's all I need (but I'm still not voting her???????), will ask questions if need be but
i.e. that's it for the day. (this last sentence of mine is probably uncharitable)In post 769, Formerfish wrote:Like that's fine for me now
If that's fine, why isn't he voting me?
PEdit: Yeah which is why you townreading FF is a problem hey?-
-
Ariane Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 341
- Joined: October 10, 2018
- Location: Australia (GMT +10)
-
-
Ariane Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 341
- Joined: October 10, 2018
- Location: Australia (GMT +10)
-
-
Ariane Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 341
- Joined: October 10, 2018
- Location: Australia (GMT +10)
-
-
Ariane Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 341
- Joined: October 10, 2018
- Location: Australia (GMT +10)
I don't love Giga but hell if I don't love FF less
-
-
Ariane Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 341
- Joined: October 10, 2018
- Location: Australia (GMT +10)
Yeah you're right, I never posted about that, and tbh it's because I still don't have a good read on either you or Stan, as mentioned above Cheeky's leant town for me, but you two are still nullIn post 804, Broxul wrote:@Ariane, did you ever do that ISO of me? I feel like you posted you would a couple times but I haven't seen a solid read from you on my slot.
You mostly have a reasonable tone, which I like, it's also a bit...placid? at times which I'm not sure how to read. You seem pretty open with your reads and your reasons for them, but... they seem safe, almost?
Like for instance you put shortaru as scum, which isn't something popular ITT, but slimer was more scum, and your vote was still on them (388)
So slimer was a safe scum read (and still very much is), and if he's town I can see scum using that to play it safe while still saying something 'novel' (that shortaru's scum)
So that's where I'm at. The long time between your posts doesn't help. Your iso strikes me as seeming open, but also as playing it safe. So, still null.-
-
Ariane Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 341
- Joined: October 10, 2018
- Location: Australia (GMT +10)
-
-
Ariane Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 341
- Joined: October 10, 2018
- Location: Australia (GMT +10)
-