Newbie 1896 - Cats, whambulances & more. [Game Over]
-
-
CheekyTeeky Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12090
- Joined: September 3, 2017
-
-
CheekyTeeky Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12090
- Joined: September 3, 2017
-
-
CheekyTeeky Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12090
- Joined: September 3, 2017
-
-
CheekyTeeky Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12090
- Joined: September 3, 2017
I wouldn't hypoclaim before a flip. Usually people hypoclaim the following day. The problem is that if we hypoclaim before the night then scum can maneuver around our intentions. If a PR happens to be killed N1 then an investigative role should have made their suspects clear in their reads; But because an investigative has died prior to using their action there is no use in figuring out who they were going yo check anyway. After a night if we all hypoclaim and a PR should die N2 then we have the info without altering scum actions or adding WIFOM to the interpretation of their actions.
Make sense?-
-
CheekyTeeky Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12090
- Joined: September 3, 2017
No it doesn't because if everyone is hypoclaiming then town, like scum, don't know what the result is. If a cop gets a gulity they have to out it so we kill the scum that day. The benefit of hypoclaiming is in case the cop dies and has left us cleared townies to work with.In post 16, shortaru wrote:For example, hypoclaiming will also allow an investigative, if one exists, to share a guilty result without necessarily being night killed the following night (I mean, it's a point of debate instead of instant trigger).-
-
CheekyTeeky Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12090
- Joined: September 3, 2017
-
-
CheekyTeeky Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12090
- Joined: September 3, 2017
Well yeah if they can get the lynch through without outting that's great, but their reads and pushes need to make sense and they are likely to be the NK anyway. I mean I'm not saying they have to out immeadiately, it is obvious that they should wait until the last possible moment to do so in that day phase but they shouldnt keep it quiet just to stay alive overnight.In post 23, stan1ey wrote:
isn't it better if the cop just tries to get the guilty scum lynched without outing themselves as a cop so they don't get killed the following night? They can always admit it if they can't convince people anyway so it's better to wait first surely. Theyll probably get more information this way anyway cos if they admit they are the cop up front then the other mafia will throw their partner under the busIn post 17, CheekyTeeky wrote:If a cop gets a gulity they have to out it so we kill the scum that day.-
-
CheekyTeeky Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12090
- Joined: September 3, 2017
-
-
CheekyTeeky
-
-
CheekyTeeky Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12090
- Joined: September 3, 2017
I know what I'm doing. But if I'm right, learn from your mistake. Will discuss more post-game. Not interested in pursuing this discussion any further at this stage.In post 34, shortaru wrote:Luckily, I'm not ENTIRELY new to Mafia, but as an SE, you should know better... unless you're forwarding a scum agenda, of course.-
-
CheekyTeeky Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12090
- Joined: September 3, 2017
And? I don't see how what I did makes sense coming from scum. You're allowed to think I'm scum so I'm not sure what it is you're expecting to gain by pushing this. Like are you trying to convince me that I'm scum or?In post 39, stan1ey wrote:
Why not? youre being called out for doing something scummy rnIn post 38, CheekyTeeky wrote:Not interested in pursuing this discussion any further at this stage.-
-
CheekyTeeky Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12090
- Joined: September 3, 2017
[float=][/float]
I meant what I said and I'm not mafia?In post 42, stan1ey wrote:
???????????????????????In post 40, CheekyTeeky wrote:Like are you trying to convince me that I'm scum or?
why are you avoiding this rather than explaining what you meant and why youre not mafia?-
-
CheekyTeeky Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12090
- Joined: September 3, 2017
-
-
CheekyTeeky Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12090
- Joined: September 3, 2017
How was calling out what everything was thinking risking the game state anymore than what shortaru was doing? Your concern means you think I'm right which means it was already outted.In post 48, theslimer3 wrote:I understand that you're in a teaching role per say, but I dont think it's a good idea to risk the game state on a quick lesson
You all are being melodramatic because I've taken an unconventional approach which has resulted in one scum taking the easy push bait and perhaps another scum early role fishing.-
-
CheekyTeeky Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12090
- Joined: September 3, 2017
Right so when people enter you think they wouldn't have thought that? It's clearly an exaggeration but it doesn't make my points any less valid.In post 54, theslimer3 wrote:You and him were literally the only ones talking. With minor chime ins from Stanley. Half the players haven't even made a comment yet, so "everyone was thinking it" isnt even a possibility-
-
CheekyTeeky Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12090
- Joined: September 3, 2017
Yes well I have an experienced player pointing out why my play is bad without really thinking about the outcomes I'm providing. It can muddy the water somewhat but as I'm a reaction-tester/ tonereader sort of player I like to sort how people jump on. I feel like stan1ey was being opportunistic and throwing shade rather than being concerned about determining my alignment. Also by asserting he's scum I get another set of info.In post 53, shortaru wrote:
By this, I mean that any future activity IRT your wagon can't be objectively analyzed in regards to looking for scum jumping on an easy push, btw.In post 52, shortaru wrote:Pointing that out, however, muddies the water on your wagon.
Figured I'd clarify on that.-
-
CheekyTeeky Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12090
- Joined: September 3, 2017
-
-
CheekyTeeky Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12090
- Joined: September 3, 2017
It may be a little unfair to accuse the IC of IIoA, when the game has been centred around hypoclaiming and readslists etc. I'm not townreading him but I'm not scumreading him yet either. I find theslimer3 scummier for his random question about RVS when we're trying to leave RVS (he's basically switching from RVS to RQS which is still a low info state). Also his push on me wasn't great either. He talked to me like he knows I'm town and then picked the weakest reasons to nullify my arguments.-
-
CheekyTeeky
-
-
CheekyTeeky Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12090
- Joined: September 3, 2017
If you don't care about the hypoclaiming question then why do you scumread me?In post 108, stan1ey wrote:No i don't really care for the conversation regarding hypoclaims/RVS or anything related to mechanics of the game, i don't think looking into that will help. i scum read cheeky-
-
CheekyTeeky Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12090
- Joined: September 3, 2017
Did I? I thought you didn't care about mechanical talk. Tell me why scum would publicly announce who they suspected to be a PR?In post 115, stan1ey wrote:You tried to out a PR, then you reacted poorly when you were called out for it and I don't like your vote on slimer
What was poor about my reaction? The fact that I called your initial push on me ridiculous? You literally asked me to explain why I'm not scum after telling me to explain myself when the reasons for shutting down a sensitive conversation around the PR talk are blatantly obvious.
Why don't you like my vote on slimer and how does it make me scum? I dislike your vote on shortaru, but I'm not jumping to the conclusion that it makes you scum just because it's different to what I think could be happening. Also not sure why you're voting Shortaru when you clearly scumread me.-
-
CheekyTeeky Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12090
- Joined: September 3, 2017
It didn't cross my mind as I'd like to think I'm experienced enough to know that would be pretty stupid to do as scum.In post 131, implosion wrote:I'm a bit skeptical of this question. Do you actually not see the obvious answer of "to gauge their reaction to try to figure out if they actually are a PR"? Or are you just being rhetorical?-
-
CheekyTeeky Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12090
- Joined: September 3, 2017
Wow no idea how to read K9. This is a new style to me.
I disagree that pressure is a bad thing or unexplainable, I thrive on pressure and even if I do get NK'd a lot N1, I also manage to lynch correctly D1 more often than not. I'm not sure it's a natural thing to say "why are you pressuring if you will be lynched or NK'd" because only scum need to worry about dying. Town need to worry about lyncjing scum, not surviving.
But then I'm conflicted as you accuse her of both not being safe by applying undue pressure, and also of being a surivalist who's playing it safe.
>.>-
-
CheekyTeeky Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12090
- Joined: September 3, 2017
-
-
CheekyTeeky Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12090
- Joined: September 3, 2017
Shortaru, can you please explain your read progression on Implosion? I'm a little confused.
In post 70, shortaru wrote:implosion does not seem to be playing to a town win condition, as I see very little in the way of actual scum-hunting from him. Instead, he is focusing on theory debate (mostly with me, granted) instead of redirecting the game to productive conversation.In post 100, shortaru wrote:I liked the opinions posted by Cheeky and implosion, and Broxul answered my question satisfactorily (as noted in my slimer vote post).
implosion finally did something productive after I called him out on it, which earned him adaptability (null in itself), but I liked the fact he went a new direction that wasn't already being pursued and decided to support it since my highest townread also suspects him.In post 109, shortaru wrote:Let me help you out.
The following players are not being lynched today:
Broxul
stan1ey
shortaru
CheekyTeeky (SE)
implosion (IC)-
-
CheekyTeeky Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12090
- Joined: September 3, 2017
I'm pretty sure I've given my reasons. But sure I'll elaborate.In post 151, Broxul wrote:@Cheeky, can you explain your vote on slimer further? Both stan and myself asked for clarification and none was really given.
I felt that this comment assumes I'm town in a way that felt TMI. (He may already know my alignment).In post 48, theslimer3 wrote:I understand that you're in a teaching role per say, but I dont think it's a good idea to risk the game state on a quick lesson
Rather than comment on my logic he nitpicks at my phrasing. "Everyone." I felt like if people thought about what I was trying to say, they would get what I meant. But instead he tries to nullify my argument because I said "Everyone thinks" instead of "what should be obvious to anyone looking."In post 54, theslimer3 wrote:
You and him were literally the only ones talking. With minor chime ins from Stanley. Half the players haven't even made a comment yet, so "everyone was thinking it" isnt even a possibilityIn post 51, CheekyTeeky wrote:
How was calling out what everything was thinking risking the game state anymore than what shortaru was doing? Your concern means you think I'm right which means it was already outted.In post 48, theslimer3 wrote:I understand that you're in a teaching role per say, but I dont think it's a good idea to risk the game state on a quick lesson
You all are being melodramatic because I've taken an unconventional approach which has resulted in one scum taking the easy push bait and perhaps another scum early role fishing.
He asks this question and has done nothing with the responses after arguing that we never had an RVS. Why do we need to go back to RVS or RQS when we were thrown out of it with my cheeky push at shortaru? In his next post he nit-picks again saying "how can we leave RVS if we've never had it" which is like...stop pointing out the least important things in people's arguments.In post 64, theslimer3 wrote:@Everyone: What's everyone think about RVS as a means to scumhunt?
If slimer gave some reads that would help a lot.-
-
CheekyTeeky Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12090
- Joined: September 3, 2017
-
-
CheekyTeeky Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12090
- Joined: September 3, 2017
-
-
CheekyTeeky Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12090
- Joined: September 3, 2017
-
-
CheekyTeeky
-
-
CheekyTeeky Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12090
- Joined: September 3, 2017
IME scum don't apologise.In post 227, theslimer3 wrote:Sorry about the mishap with reading the scumthread wrong-
-
CheekyTeeky Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12090
- Joined: September 3, 2017
-
-
CheekyTeeky Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12090
- Joined: September 3, 2017
Lol.In post 235, shortaru wrote:
Seriously, this is a load of garbage.In post 231, CheekyTeeky wrote:IME scum don't apologise.
This post is slimer's THIRD apology in ONE game as scum.
Put your vote back or come up with a better excuse.
1. Can you link the other two? I only see him apologising for formatting and that's not the same as apologising for a misunderstanding. When I say they don't apologise, what I mean is that they don't apologise for their pushes in games that I've played. I can't give you an example of this due to site rules. I will do if that changes. But to me it's a town tell.
2. Don't tell me what to do. You don't have to agree but don't assume that I'm your puppet. You can make your case and respect me enough to let me play the game my way. Just like I'm letting you play without ordering you around or interfering with your pushes.-
-
CheekyTeeky Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12090
- Joined: September 3, 2017
I looked over the other apologies and I think context is very important. I may have not been clear enough in explaining my stance but I do believe that apologising in this instance is enough to give him breathing room. I tend to jump on and off people randomly but there is a reason I find that useful even if the way I use my votes are confusing to others. If I feel I need to elaborate I will. When I'm confident on a scum read I will provide a case. I'm just sorting currently so it's not the end of the world if I change my mind on any reads as I go along.-
-
CheekyTeeky Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12090
- Joined: September 3, 2017
Ok, it's a little odd that I ensured you were the NK and yet you seemed to assume you'd be alive D2.In post 233, shortaru wrote:
IME it's generally more productive to plan for the future and be wrong than anticipate death and be wrong.In post 232, CheekyTeeky wrote:Shortaru why do you believe you'll be alive tomorrow to hypoclaim?-
-
CheekyTeeky Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12090
- Joined: September 3, 2017
Yeah bringing it up was a bad idea, because I figured the NK would sort you, but by pointing out your odd assumption I've made it more likely that if you are left alive it's going to be harder to differentiate between wifom or my gut feel that you were scum early role fishing.In post 243, shortaru wrote:
You didn't ensure anything.In post 241, CheekyTeeky wrote:
Ok, it's a little odd that I ensured you were the NK and yet you seemed to assume you'd be alive D2.In post 233, shortaru wrote:
IME it's generally more productive to plan for the future and be wrong than anticipate death and be wrong.In post 232, CheekyTeeky wrote:Shortaru why do you believe you'll be alive tomorrow to hypoclaim?
You may have made me a likely choice, but unless you're the one deciding the night kill, you can't claim to know what scum intends to do.
For all you know, I might be left alone for WIFOM.-
-
CheekyTeeky Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12090
- Joined: September 3, 2017
Yeah I fudged my explanation. It is a new tell. I gave a quick response because I didn't want to say "I want to put pressure on K9 to see what happens" because that defeats the purpose of adding pressure. For all I know slimer can still be scum but I don't feel like we're going to get anything different out of him at L-1 so why not sort other slots to PoE a better read.In post 247, Ariane wrote:This recent apology thing seems weird...particularly since Cheeky said:
Which means (I assume) it's ongoing, which means it's a really new town indicator, which has presumably only happened onceIn post 239, CheekyTeeky wrote:I can't give you an example of this due to site rules. I will do if that changes. But to me it's a town tell.
I have 3 scumreads, one of them has to be wrong.-
-
CheekyTeeky Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12090
- Joined: September 3, 2017
-
-
CheekyTeeky
-
-
CheekyTeeky Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12090
- Joined: September 3, 2017
-
-
CheekyTeeky Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12090
- Joined: September 3, 2017
-
-
CheekyTeeky Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12090
- Joined: September 3, 2017
I think this is towny. He's clearly read so it's unlikely scum would draw attention to themselves using this PoV after Shortaru already jumped down Stan1ey's throat for the lack of associative logic.In post 269, Emyrs Baneheart wrote:From post 135 - Perhaps I'm missing something here but I don't quite understand the logic here. Why is it not possible for cheeky to accuse short of being a cop if both of you are scum?
This is the kind of paranoia that I expected from townies in regards to my actions. This is in blatant contrast to K9 who could've seen I was townread and tried to get in the town group by following along. I don't think anyone should think I'm completely innocent at this stageIn post 269, Emyrs Baneheart wrote:From post 159 - By making it seem like you're a cop early on, wouldn't that be akin to attempting to steer how others perceive you? Considering the fact that you are an active poster up till that point in the game, it would seem that it's a good strategy to be able to manipulate/steer how the discussion goes if you're a scum. I'm not saying it's clear you did that but it just gives me that sort of feeling.-
-
CheekyTeeky Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12090
- Joined: September 3, 2017
I appreciate your enthusiasm but not all players have the same "get her done" approach to mafia. I feel like it's too early to expect Emrys to have solid reads nailed down at this point (given his number of posts). His style seems to be more observative than reaction test-y. You'll find some people on MS will scum read you for having too many reads early, not enough reads or just disagreeing with your reads. I feel like once players like Emrys and K9 post more then we will have a fair idea of their overall intent. Implosion is a slot I'll assume is town until I have serious reason to believe otherwise, mainly because I've seen a few ICs play passively and it is a "thing" that they always get suspected by the new players. It's usually best to sort the IC via PoE for me.-
-
CheekyTeeky Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12090
- Joined: September 3, 2017
-
-
CheekyTeeky Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12090
- Joined: September 3, 2017
It's hard to take your PoE seriously when you still have a null readIn post 287, shortaru wrote:PoE DID factor into my read of implosion. That's a big reason I've been holding off on giving voice to my suspicions.-
-
CheekyTeeky Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12090
- Joined: September 3, 2017
I think this is the second time you've guilted someone for their lack of insight into associatives. Your constant brainwork in working out reads based on associatives reminds me a lot of Almost50 (a player I respect). I wonder if you're conf. biasing yourself into thinking that since your mind works best that way at finding scum, and you're town, then players who aren't thinking that way must be scum? It seems (if you're town) you're scumreading people from playing different to you (not being proactive, naked voting, indecisive, passive, lack of effort or logic etc). Tbh not many players I've seen care about associatives D1 if at all the entire game. I myself struggle with associatives, in that I often read them wrong, I'm much better at just finding the scummiest players regardless if I think they make sense together.In post 283, shortaru wrote:Hold the phone... he's voting slimer, so shouldn't the natural assumption be that he's considering Broxul being hesitant about putting his buddy at L-1 instead of basically treating slimer like he's town in this post?
Why would putting slimer at L-1 "look bad" if the assumption is that slimer is scum? It wouldn't.
He knows slimer is town and accused Broxul of not wanting to look bad by putting a townie at L-1.
So I guess my point is I don't see it as particularly scummy if people aren't thinking about what pairs make sense D1 (pre-flip associations).-
-
CheekyTeeky Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12090
- Joined: September 3, 2017
-
-
CheekyTeeky
-
-
CheekyTeeky Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12090
- Joined: September 3, 2017
-
-
CheekyTeeky Survivor
-
-
CheekyTeeky
-
-
CheekyTeeky Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12090
- Joined: September 3, 2017
I will go more in depth at some point but basically the beginning of his iso is bad.
61 is a bad entrance - focuses on the set-up spec, no sorting via RVS or otherwise. Feels a tad LAMIST.
62 - more waffle without taking a stance on anyone, straight IIoA, and they say they've caught up.
74 - They literally have to be asked by Implosion before giving a stance. And the stance is a "weak town lean"
94 - votes Emrys to encourage content whilst activlely avoiding sorting people that already have content. It feels like a safe vote that won't ruffle any feathers/get people looking into him
107 - Says short v me isn't SvS. But doesn't elaborate on his read of short so it could be svt/tvt etc, still adding nothing useful in the way of sorting.
110 onwards a bunch of please explain/why are people voting slimer followed by a readslist with slimer as a scumlean. The shaky start and following empty busy work feels like scum trying to discreetly maneuver the game.-
-
CheekyTeeky
-
-
CheekyTeeky Survivor
-
-
CheekyTeeky Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12090
- Joined: September 3, 2017
-
-
CheekyTeeky Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12090
- Joined: September 3, 2017
I kind of hope he does XDIn post 372, shortaru wrote:Careful, stan1ey will say you're scummier than I am if you vote him.-
-
CheekyTeeky Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12090
- Joined: September 3, 2017
-
-
CheekyTeeky Survivor
-
-
CheekyTeeky Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12090
- Joined: September 3, 2017
-
-
CheekyTeeky Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12090
- Joined: September 3, 2017
Broxul went from your second highest townread to your lynch victim. Also since when is logic AI lol? Scum can be logical too.In post 310, stan1ey wrote:Broxul:
There is a few things I don't like. for example in 268 he phrases his question to Short in a way that makes it seem like he has caught Short out on something but it's obvious Short just misread what I wrote. He could have pointed that out instead of making that post. But most of his posts I can tell he is thinking logically about his reads so I think its likely he is town.
What exactly convinced you at this point? The case was just a rehash of already stated ideas.
-
-
CheekyTeeky Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12090
- Joined: September 3, 2017
-
-
CheekyTeeky Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12090
- Joined: September 3, 2017
-
-
-
-
-
-
-