yeah well, hors d'oeuvres. how about thatIn post 10, u r a person 2 wrote:guess I never learned to spell 'omelette'
VOTE: u r a person
what is your preferred shorthand
person
urap2
ura
U2 ----------- bono?
yeah well, hors d'oeuvres. how about thatIn post 10, u r a person 2 wrote:guess I never learned to spell 'omelette'
this seems a bit forced, like youre trying to work something in there just to postIn post 34, Saladman27 wrote:I guess eggs really do start the day!
good attitude. though apparently everyone else somewhat agrees since there were a grand total of 3 posts yesterday after this.In post 36, TTTT wrote:I don't really want to play until the two newbies who haven't posted show up
thanks, i'll look through themIn post 37, RCEnigma wrote:If I can add to your suggested reading TTTT, salad, voted, and I have a completed newbie game in which we were all town and I believe voted has a recent completed game as scum. I'm not sure on that though, I haven't read through it.
i cant tell whether youre being snippy and sarcastic here.In post 38, Voted wrote:Have fun comparing the games.
i thought your entry was sort of interesting for a couple reasons. the first is that you could set up a short rhyme as some sort of entry shtick. i didnt find it particularly scummy though. the second is what changed since your first game on your stance on poetry? in your second post you say something about not wanting haikus.In post 39, Eggs wrote:Thank you RCE.
Voted could you please explain in more detail your read of me. I appreciate you referred to my scummy entry, can you elaborate?
so was this mostly about tttt?In post 27, RCEnigma wrote:Forgot to check back on this and I missed out on a poetry slam.
Anyways I have reads already, some of which I'll ride to endgame. Well, one of them anyways.
so you had no reads at that point? instead of making a post that doesnt say anything aside from 'im here guys' pick something that stands out and ask a question of your own.In post 53, Saladman27 wrote:Eggs' intro was kind of weird but all Intros are. Eggs himself? I TR him for now. First of all My opening wasn't the one Zeebi pointed out. Second, that post wasn't intended to sound lurkish, I'm just trying to avoid being mislynched for making little to none posts and there weren't much questions to answer for me then.RCEnigma wrote:What's up saladman, how we feeling? What do you think about eggs and his entrance? What do you think about Zeebu calling your opening forced?In post 46, u r a person 2 wrote:zeebu and eggs are town. =)
that you followed this up with a vote on tttt is fine and makes sense considering the direction things have taken against him, i dont like the part of the comment where your strategy is to put a vote on someone who has none yet. if thats more of a reason for this particular vote that is fine, but if its a general strategy, i dont like it. we find things out by running multiple votes on a person and seeing how they react.In post 84, The Grand Sham wrote:From the time of this message, Eggs did seem the most suspect. However, I might vote for someone who's not received any votes yet to keep day 1 going and possibly get additional reads on people. I am trying to get the game green off of me and getting reads simultaneously. Not to mention absorb that long list of rules while learning how this forum works.
im not sure what you mean by this post?In post 124, RCEnigma wrote:But then immediately follows with this post implying the opposite.In post 87, The Grand Sham wrote:If he does I would be happy to pull mine. Are you also voting with TTTT, Enigma?
thats what it seems like, but i still want to hear it from RCE. just felt like there was more meaning behind it.In post 135, Eggs wrote:He's saying that Grand Sham voting TTTT thinking he's scum (because he voted a townie and scum vote townies) is towny from a new player perspective.
But then Grand Sham says that the scum read isn't real and the vote will therefore be pulled once TTTT unvotes i.e. it was purely a defensive vote.
and now we have 3 people with 2 votes apiece if my count is right.In post 160, TTTT wrote:less than 4 days left
@voted
@zeebu
@salad
can you guys plz at least start talking about the two main wagons?
this is the first thing youve done that has struck me as odd. i get the alex vote but your response to salads question (to RCE) doesnt jive with your usual tone.In post 167, Eggs wrote:Will chat about my reasoning later. Gonna have to ask you to just mull it over in the mean time.In post 165, Saladman27 wrote:May I ask why, RC?
VOTE: Alexander
do you still think sham is scummy?In post 170, u r a person 2 wrote:What's the case on Alex? I have been paying less attention to this game than other games, so can just point me to a post if it exists
he reminds me of me my first game so i am now leaning town towards himIn post 172, u r a person 2 wrote:of course, lolIn post 171, zeebu wrote:do you still think sham is scummy?In post 170, u r a person 2 wrote:What's the case on Alex? I have been paying less attention to this game than other games, so can just point me to a post if it exists
well, i gave a short summary of my case on why i agree with the pressure on alex in 168. it boils down to him not saying all that much, jumping on the TTTT wagon with little to no reasoning and then when prodded falls back on agreeing that the two wagons are his biggest scum reads. it seems like a very contented way to look at the state of things and that he no longer feels the need to try and scum hunt.In post 176, u r a person 2 wrote:I have no opinion on Alex, mate. That's why I was asking for the case.
Also, it's not a great idea to use player a's meta to make a case on player b.
TTTT is probably town, but is good enough that I wouldn't catch him D1 if he wasn't.
In post 175, Eggs wrote:I would like to add exhibits #168 and #169 to the museum of Townreading Zeebu - now accepting patrons.In post 95, RCEnigma wrote: Talk to me about the Zeebu read then.
that's fineIn post 182, u r a person 2 wrote:Respectfully, I don't really feel that your argument for town!sham is compelling
jackpot, thanksIn post 190, u r a person 2 wrote:Display posts from previous: [ALL POSTS] Sort by [POST TIME] [ASCENDING] Go is not implemented yet.
Display posts by user: [ALL USERS] [ + ] Go is not implemented yet.
pick a user and then hit the [+] and add a second. You can do up to 3 slots at once
he came in without much of a grasp of these forum mechanics and strategy and whatnot. his entry was something like what he was used to in his games and he got jumped on for it being a scum tell with a wagon quickly forming. i did a similar thing in 1925 and didnt understand why suddenly i was on L-1 in a hurry. after it was explained a bit i didnt panic and started playing the game by trying to give reads and scum hunt.In post 187, TTTT wrote:in what specific ways does he remind you of a young zeebs?In post 173, zeebu wrote:he reminds me of me my first game so i am now leaning town towards himIn post 172, u r a person 2 wrote:of course, lolIn post 171, zeebu wrote:do you still think sham is scummy?In post 170, u r a person 2 wrote:What's the case on Alex? I have been paying less attention to this game than other games, so can just point me to a post if it exists
In post 270, Voted wrote:So you think that I am scum because:
1) I don't want to lynch SE day 1 (which is my meta, hence NAI)
2) That I picked active, scum hunting, towny player, basically worst lynch possible, thinking that I can make town (4 people) lynch him whisout giving any proofs expect wild accusations is much more probable that I just wanted to make a gambit with it.
neither slot has done anything to convince me that they arent scum. the fact that voted has kept posting and its only reinforced my position on him is why i voted for him. alex stopped posting. i could have added intent but i went with what i have as a stronger read currently.
who are you asking this to?In post 307, The Grand Sham wrote:That's not what I'm asking, URAP... I'm asking if anything thinks Alex and/or Voted would be a mislynch and why. Obviously anyone can be a mislynch, as you said, but I think it might be useful to read the why's behind the thinking.
im not trying to intentionally ignore your questions, im just not sure what youre asking. can you rephrase?In post 310, The Grand Sham wrote:I was asking everyone since everyone is voting for either Voted or Alex... except Alex and Voted.
you arent the boss of me.In post 353, Eggs wrote:Push TTTT on the basis it's kinda scummy, or just let it lie.In post 352, zeebu wrote: though i am interested to hear the reasoning on TTTT's hammer without claim.
I’m just so wholesomeIn post 623, RadiantCowbells wrote:when I said scum was kind of obvious I thought it was Tttt + 1 townie who i will refuse to disclose forreasons
so i wasn't exactly right and i'm glad i didn't commit to it publicly