helloIn post 58, LeRea wrote:I don't like how quickly people started to gang up on DK to be honest. I'm thinking there might be one (or more!) scum in that push.
VOTE: lerea
who is scum in that push
helloIn post 58, LeRea wrote:I don't like how quickly people started to gang up on DK to be honest. I'm thinking there might be one (or more!) scum in that push.
why is it townyIn post 60, DkKoba wrote:I think LeRea's sentiment is towny even if they mininterpreted Furtive's posts as also going after me and the negative tone TL used for me as ganging up.
I get thats what they were going for though and mainly saw RCE as being the pusher.
You are right. This is what I had in mind. But it's not an automatic gotcha because instead of "know", I was considering that they could be genuine reads and I would know more about your POV (alternatively, lock you into a POV if you're scum) by asking you more about them.In post 177, Takemikazuchi02 wrote:Your response was that me saying you and Bell were reading too much into LeRea means I know both of you are town trying to gamesolve and not maf, because maf would never read too much into someone's alignment. This is only possible if I was maf so how is this NOT a gotcha argument?
lol. do you feel bombarded?In post 219, Takemikazuchi02 wrote:Not convinced by you bombarding me with the weak questions. It feels like you're trying to look like you're trying to gamesolve without actually doing it.
Sure. Look at furtive's recent interaction with Koba. Doesn't thatIn post 254, Takemikazuchi02 wrote:@HEMExplain why you think furtive is town and why you think those 4 are the best flip choices.
Yep. Scum!Koba is bold as fuck.In post 282, RCEnigma wrote:Is Scum!Koba also more comfortable being the loudest voice in the town? I havent played against or with scum!koba. I would imagine their play follows the same patterns as either alignment but I dont really know.In post 275, humaneatingmonkey wrote:im not gonna sit here and proclaim myself as koba expert when koba probably has a lot of cards on their sleeves. i just have a baseline on what their beats usually are.
- If I'm scum for not solving anything, then that's not valid anymore because I released a read list and a solve. Do you think I faked that on the spot? Do you think they weren't genuine? If not, how do you think that is?In post 246, DkKoba wrote:That being said - my vibe on HEM is that they are trying to look like they are solving by asking a lot of questions while the real goal is to waste time and divert attention. It looks towny on the surface - and its a great mafia tactic(i use it myself) but I'm worried thati dont get the impression HEM is actualy trying to solve anything.
Bell is my second scumread atp in that I don't feel the towny energy that he has when he is town.
The best way for me to sort him is pressure(for me) and seeing how he reacts and so far I'm not impressed. I can show receipts of this working fwiw. He has improved as mafia and is better but observant players like myself still see it.
The reason i shifted from bell to HEM was because HEM dropped into my PoE due to how they were treating others.
If I'm mafia? Sure it can be because I'm trying to powerscum my way to not get eliminated - but I feel that my progression is clear and that my mafia playstyle is not concerned with early votes - in fact my go to is to ignore and let the pressure dissapate.
I recognize my playstyle easily attracts scumreads from people who don't know my meta - but I'm an open book player. If you are confused why i did something, i can usually explain, even if it is to admit "i honestly dont know"(which happens to town more often than not!!)
You are either town who was traumatized by my scumplay and now trying to get rid of me just so you can say you're a kingslayer.In post 286, DkKoba wrote:hem commit to a read on me. Now.
am i egging it on by being asked and answering truthfully? have i not answered truthfully?In post 287, DkKoba wrote:hem is trying to egg on the scumreads towards me without actual critical analysis or commitment on me btw so he can help push a mislim through on me likely. Mistake because i am unlimmable on day 1 unless i allow it if im scum
Me too. If you can point which argument I'm making right now are based on wordplay or semantics, I will immediately drop it.In post 290, DkKoba wrote:I have no interest in wordplay or semantics
It would be. It would also be premature since some of the slots have not been present yet and will set a bad example.In post 300, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:He isn't E-1, right?
Would be a bad thing to hammer immediately
I'm an emotional player.In post 306, Bell wrote:It doesn’t. I barely have a scum read on you in the first place. But your posts are not making you seem more or less town. Maybe slightly less. Because they feel poorly focused.In post 301, humaneatingmonkey wrote:If my answers make you doubt your scumread on me then good, it's working.
To copy your style of presenting information you appear sensitive.
Would you say you’re sensitive as either alignment?
You at least understand that it's a bad thing to hammer immediately. It would be not that hard to extrapolate that giving scum the chance to lolhammer and get away with it is a bad thing too.In post 300, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:He isn't E-1, right?
Would be a bad thing to hammer immediately
I do consider itIn post 394, DkKoba wrote:Can anyone answer me why they aren't considering Bell at all btw - considering yknow
they are the most obvious scum in the room and they have a polarized meta and one can literally just read a game from them and see?
like in case you dont believe me here is me sniping bell early game and then bell posts out of it (because he is evolved as a scum player now and is not as easy) : viewtopic.php?f=83&t=89010