Newbie 187 - Game Over

Ameliaslay · Post Post #7 (isolation #0) » Fri Jan 27, 2006 2:28 am

Hooray!!! Hi to Talitha again... I'm so excited to be playing with BigAl and TMW (who I followed in 175) And a special welcome all newbs!

bigal wrote:Yay! Well, I'll do a random vote: TripMyWire

Is that really a random vote?

random vote: bertrand

Ameliaslay · Post Post #15 (isolation #1) » Sat Jan 28, 2006 5:44 am

Ameliaslay · Post Post #28 (isolation #2) » Sun Jan 29, 2006 4:46 pm

Yep, and and its usually bright-eyed, idealistic newbs who express their views far to freely ( as I found in my first game

) But in general lots of discussion helps...

unvote: vote CreedP

Ameliaslay · Post Post #51 (isolation #3) » Tue Jan 31, 2006 4:06 pm

bigAl wrote:Everything is scummy.

That must mean you are too,

unvote: vote bigAl

Ameliaslay · Post Post #54 (isolation #4) » Wed Feb 01, 2006 12:55 pm

Hmm, well.. :shrug:

Ameliaslay · Post Post #59 (isolation #5) » Wed Feb 01, 2006 1:23 pm

BigAl wrote:I assumed I was pretty much an early-game semi-random vote.

That, and I'm trying on my new devil-may-care playing style...

Ameliaslay · Post Post #73 (isolation #6) » Sat Feb 04, 2006 5:41 pm

Ooh, ahhh.. it's weird, but I like it...

Ameliaslay · Post Post #80 (isolation #7) » Sun Feb 05, 2006 4:58 pm

And perhaps you never will be muhahaha...

No seriously, um CreedP's comments seemed kind of scummy but at this point there hasn't been enough discussion to compel me to change my vote.

Ameliaslay · Post Post #85 (isolation #8) » Mon Feb 06, 2006 10:58 am

And that exchange makes me think I'm not going to.

Ameliaslay · Post Post #88 (isolation #9) » Mon Feb 06, 2006 3:53 pm

Why would a person deliberately egg other people on to vote them? That was my thought...

Ameliaslay · Post Post #95 (isolation #10) » Wed Feb 08, 2006 3:56 pm

You're awfully inquisitive.

Ameliaslay · Post Post #97 (isolation #11) » Thu Feb 09, 2006 4:42 pm

Do you want to make it one?

Ameliaslay · Post Post #107 (isolation #12) » Tue Feb 14, 2006 11:03 am

Hmph, well I'm here but I haven't really seen anything to reply to or anything... This is a dead town, we need a Fritzler to come in and stir some action...

Ameliaslay · Post Post #109 (isolation #13) » Tue Feb 14, 2006 4:15 pm

Well, if he's not town... he's a really blatant scum. To me it seems too obvious a gambit for him... but if he's asking for it, I'm always happy to oblige.

Ameliaslay · Post Post #113 (isolation #14) » Wed Feb 15, 2006 2:28 am

talitha wrote:And I've got my eye on Amelia

Tee hee.

Ameliaslay · Post Post #115 (isolation #15) » Wed Feb 15, 2006 7:19 am

Stop offering yourself up for a lynch target and posy something constructive such as I think so and so is scummy because of such and such post. We will never get anywhere lynching you, if you truly are town because that would be a wasted lynch.

Ameliaslay · Post Post #121 (isolation #16) » Sat Feb 18, 2006 5:19 am

You know, I really think I am too.

Ameliaslay · Post Post #124 (isolation #17) » Sun Feb 19, 2006 5:08 am

So, along that line of thought, wouldn't it be an interesting scum pair, Tally and Creed?

Ameliaslay · Post Post #134 (isolation #18) » Tue Feb 21, 2006 4:20 pm

Yes, welcome!

Ameliaslay · Post Post #142 (isolation #19) » Wed Feb 22, 2006 11:51 am

Bertrand wrote:I'm the cop

If that's the case, I'll act on my suspicions tomorrow.

Ameliaslay · Post Post #160 (isolation #20) » Thu Feb 23, 2006 3:43 pm

talitha wrote:
vote: Amelia

That comment about Creed and I being an interesting scum pairing, just struck me as scummy, for some reason.

I posted that first to catch your attention /to see how you'd react, and because the thought popped in to my mind.... And actually, bigAl is the person who has caught my eye (other than Creed) but for now I'll just

unvote

because what most people have seen as scummy by Creed, I think is a little naive and dumb (no offense)... I'm reluctant to vote based on that just yet.

Ameliaslay · Post Post #162 (isolation #21) » Fri Feb 24, 2006 3:02 am

I mean, I have other suspicions which I have neglected to bring to light thus far because I was convinced Bertrand was scum... and I thought the day was very close to a close... Paint my actions how you will.

Ameliaslay · Post Post #164 (isolation #22) » Fri Feb 24, 2006 3:53 pm

I'm tired of sitting here twiddling my thumbs in this game...

vote: Creed

Ameliaslay · Post Post #169 (isolation #23) » Mon Feb 27, 2006 11:56 am

Is that a claim, or a joke?

I hit that day-opening post with-out scrolling down all the way and thought we had a successful doc. protect... that was clever cam!

Ameliaslay · Post Post #173 (isolation #24) » Mon Feb 27, 2006 1:32 pm

Joke, people, joke...

Ameliaslay · Post Post #178 (isolation #25) » Tue Feb 28, 2006 3:21 pm

Okay, I really think it a bit too much of a coincidence that Bertrand's investigation confirmed a dead townie...
And as far as what I was thinking suspicionwise yesterday, that's fallen flat. Granted I could speculate, but I don't really have anything to back it up. And yes, my last post yesterday was genuine this is about the slowest game I'm in right now...and the slowness hasn't brought anything noteworthy to light.

Ameliaslay · Post Post #187 (isolation #26) » Thu Mar 02, 2006 6:21 pm

Okay, idea. How about a mass claim which we can then analyze?

Ameliaslay · Post Post #196 (isolation #27) » Mon Mar 06, 2006 1:55 pm

bigAl wrote:I don't really see what mass claiming would do at this point. I assume that if bertrand is not the cop and we have a real cop, they would have counter claimed by now. So basically all it would do is out a possible doc. Which would mean that, if outed, we would have to lynch correctly tomorrow as well.

True, but we'd have a confirmed innocent?
I still am not sure I trust that claim that we have on the table though.

Ameliaslay · Post Post #199 (isolation #28) » Tue Mar 07, 2006 11:59 am

bigAl wrote:Me neither...still, could be true. Possibly we should try to lynch the 'other' scum first

Right now no one's talking enough to provide other options, unless we lynch a lurker....

Ameliaslay · Post Post #203 (isolation #29) » Tue Mar 07, 2006 2:18 pm

Nope and in fact I'll vote myself

vote:Starkmoon

Ameliaslay · Post Post #205 (isolation #30) » Tue Mar 07, 2006 4:07 pm

Not a bit.

Ameliaslay · Post Post #212 (isolation #31) » Wed Mar 08, 2006 10:41 am

starkmoon wrote:Erm, can I ask why you have voted for me Amelia?

To see how long it would take you to repond.

Ameliaslay · Post Post #214 (isolation #32) » Thu Mar 09, 2006 2:25 am

bertrand wrote:Elaborate? Why do you want to know how long it takes him to respond? I'm lost here... do you have a Cunning Plan?

Do you think if it was truly a cunning plan I would share it with you?

Ameliaslay · Post Post #216 (isolation #33) » Thu Mar 09, 2006 10:45 am

Precisely.

Ameliaslay · Post Post #219 (isolation #34) » Thu Mar 09, 2006 4:05 pm

I was not "on Creed's wagon" I merely placed the hammer, I was "on" your wagon.

Ameliaslay · Post Post #222 (isolation #35) » Fri Mar 10, 2006 2:30 am

mathcam wrote:
Official End of Day Vote Count:

Creed (4, Stark, Bertrand, Thok, Amelia)
BigAl (1, Creed)
Starkmoon (1, BigAl)
Amelia (1, Tally)

Not Voting: No one!

And with that, the town lynches...
CreedP, townie.

Get those night choices in!

Cam

Look who's pointing fingers.

Ameliaslay · Post Post #224 (isolation #36) » Fri Mar 10, 2006 7:19 am

bertrand wrote:I'm slightly more inclined to think Amelia is scum, because she was on the Creed wagon.

You are suspicious of me because I was "on" Creed's wagon when the fact is you were as well.
And, I have deliberately thrown statements out to stir up discussion, namely no/flippant justification for votes which until now have excited no interest. Were I scum, I'd try to fly as under the radar as possible (see Newbie 169)
Of course I'm redirecting attention, to the facts.

Ameliaslay · Post Post #240 (isolation #37) » Sat Mar 11, 2006 12:04 pm

Ameliaslay · Post Post #249 (isolation #38) » Tue Mar 14, 2006 7:00 am

So, did we have a doc?