/realises we're already slowly moving away from RVS/
Damn
VOTE: copper223
I'm still in RVS and copper is a bad substance
In post 24, XnadrojX wrote:I acknowledged Town is moving out of RVS
I didn't say we're alreadyoutof RVS and I'm just going to fit inmyRVS vote before we properly move out of RVS
Here you mention "not leave room forIn post 10, nn30 wrote:UNVOTE: Accountant
You guys are sheep lol.
Let's not leave room for scum to barrel us into a turbo lynch D1.
Here you say "was attempting to avoid the second situation", where second situation refers to "In post 12, nn30 wrote:@Vijarada - whoever hammered would have barreled into suicide, yes.
Scum hammering like that - suicide.
Town newbie hammering like that - totally possible and still suicide.
A was attempting to avoid the second situation.
Inconsistency == scummyIn post 29, nn30 wrote:Inconsistency =/= scummy.In post 26, XnadrojX wrote:Here you mention "not leave room forIn post 10, nn30 wrote:UNVOTE: Accountant
You guys are sheep lol.
Let's not leave room for scum to barrel us into a turbo lynch D1.scumto barrel us into a turbo lynch D1"Here you say "was attempting to avoid the second situation", where second situation refers to "In post 12, nn30 wrote:@Vijarada - whoever hammered would have barreled into suicide, yes.
Scum hammering like that - suicide.
Town newbie hammering like that - totally possible and still suicide.
A was attempting to avoid the second situation.Town newbie hammering like that"
Inconsistency much?
lemme clarify the previous bit. It didn't look like that exact bit of inconsistency where he said that he was refering to town when he said scum was pointed out at the time I made my postIn post 37, XnadrojX wrote:I was already typing my post and for some reason the Preview thingie that phpBB does didn't pop up when you posted for me.
Also I didn't notice that that specific bit of inconsistency was already pointed out
Of all the scummy things I did this is the one that asks you to lynch me? Me moving off my RVS vote after forgetting about you is scummy? What in that post suggests I had intention to vote you?In post 47, nn30 wrote:This definitely reads as scummy. Especially the part where you didn't put your vote on me...In post 43, XnadrojX wrote:Wait what I'm still on copper? oops lemme fix that real quick
UNVOTE: Copper
and yes I count that as stalking
PEdit: There was a cover up. You clearly stated "scum" in 10 followed by "newbie town" in post 12. There's nothing to clarify
VOTE: xnadrojx
In post 34, Accountant wrote:
What is more concerning is your attempt to justify and cover it up.
Also, I'm interested as to why you felt the need to defend XnadrojX so badly that you even went to the trouble of calculating percentages and going through his past games. Why not let him speak for himself?
ok found it. Here Accountant clearly says that inconsistency wasn't the problem, while nn30 claims you scumread him for inconsistency. He even quoted that bit later, which showed he didn't simply overlook it.In post 42, nn30 wrote:
I understand that you've already moved your vote, but youalready voted mefor being inconsistent. You're scum reading me for my inconsistency, but you're being inconsistent yourself! Do you see how stupid this is?
And even so that was the post that he quoted was just me getting off my RVS vote. He specifically said that that post was scummy.In post 54, Accountant wrote:I disagree with a lot of the things nn30 said, but this is not one of them. You've been constantly attacking him and calling him out for various inconsistencies and "lies"(your own words). Why wouldn't you vote someone who was a liar? Do you, like me, think there is someone even scummier or even more deserving of the limelight out there? Why haven't you voted them?What in that post suggests I had intention to vote you?
I was applying pressure on nn30. Accountant's reason to vote me was "Doing an RVS vote out of RVS". I have no idea how that leads to them being certain enough that I am scum to not wish to interact with meIn post 87, Vijarada wrote:Xnadroj: You call nn30 scum, a liar etc etc and refuse to vote for him. You then vote accountant... for confidently saying you are scum. Why?
"My analysis is horrific"In post 113, Vijarada wrote:Yeah I was holding off on scumreading Xnadro but his vote on accountant and his subsequent justification is just horrific. Like, his analysis all game has been garbage, his scumreads have been a popularly pressured person who Xnadro refused to vote, followed by someone who did nothing other than vote Xnadro, his post-hoc stuff is probably worse than nn30's. I didn't think his RVS vote was scummy, I thought his play after that for a while was only a little scummy, but after this latest stuff I'm absolutely happy to lynch him.
Ffs I explained this already, it was my RVS vote that i forgot to get off before exiting RVS. Is it that hard for you to understand?In post 111, nn30 wrote:He also unvoted copper when prompted, suggesting he's trying to be too cooperative.
I was aware I was scummy, I just disagreed with the exccesive confidence Accountant had. I'm pretty sure 2 (3?) scumtells doesn't mean that someone is 100% scum, or scum enough to warrant their unwillingness to interact in any manner to me. To me, unwillingness to interact shows a gun to the head 100% confidence on me and I'm pretty sure that getting a vote in page 1 using RVS just when we're exiting RVS just to ego, and not voting a guy who I was pressuring doesIn post 156, keyenpeydee wrote:Do you even realize you're being scummy? I thought you've realized...In post 84, XnadrojX wrote:So you scumread me so much that gun to the head I'm scum? I wonder where all this confidence is coming from, I never knew you could be 100% sure someone is scum 3 pages in.
VOTE: Accountant
VOTE: XnadrojX
More and more reading you makes it really lose my Town read on you.