Newbie 1764: Wind Game Over

[Van_Veacesalv_Dulca]

VOTE: DeathByWobbuffet

the dice never lies owo

[Van_Veacesalv_Dulca]

Um, I assume I am Van, right?

I don't know, too early to tell. I don't like Charloux post about hammering, but I assume that is an inside joke I am just not privy to, then the subsequent opinion change without justification looks a little strange. Post 12, Post 34

I also don't like accountants post about wagoning and then subsequent wagon. I thought wagons were a sign of being scum, so looks scummy to me. At least scummier than others. Post 19 owo

but these are as minor as minor gets, so I don't really know for sure what to think yet.
In the end I will just go with my reads, better than my die ... probably

UNVOTE: DeathByWobbuffet
VOTE: Charloux


owo

[Van_Veacesalv_Dulca]

You are in position 3, primacy and recency don't apply there, so it would be the easiest place for scum to hide and avoid attention right? I thought that was why wagons are or at least can be scummy. That changes if it is a confirmed scum wagon though which this certainly isn't.

owo

[Van_Veacesalv_Dulca]

Being willing to jump on a hammer so soon is what I don't like about it. If I don't like something I tend towards it looking scummy to me

I am not saying the wagon is scummy, but that wagoning is, particularly without reason. Maybe that is wrong, I don't know, but for the time being that is what I see.

owo

[Van_Veacesalv_Dulca]

I agree with Post 45. As I said, I don't think wagons are scummy, but that wagoning is, particularly without reasons. You stated pressure, which is fair, but not enough to sway my opinion on the matter.

owo

[Van_Veacesalv_Dulca]

Yep, so I already feel out of my depth in this game :/ Sorry everyone for being inactive, I have been a little unreliably attached to the internet for the last 2-3 days.

@Van: So, to be clear, you think that forming lynches on players is okay, but you think mindlessly hopping onto wagons is bad, right?

Yes, I think mindless wagon hopping is bad. Forming Lynches is more case by case dependent. If I think someone is town, but people are forming a lynch on them and I can't understand the argument, I will become suspicious of those players, and equally so those that vote for the player without adding their own thoughts.

I still hold my suspicions on Charloux, and Accountant, though could someone correct me if I am wrong on Accountants [quote="In post 83 but is this an example of wine in front of me? I don't fully understand the concept, but the only other game I played (different site), people told me wine in front of me was scummy because it reduces the ability to properly argue against it or something along those lines.

I am also suspicious of Gamma for town reading me? I didn't think I had done enough of anything to form a solid read on me. - Nevermind, sorry, I missed a few posts it seems I haven't decided if this point is mute yet though I am leaning no, that seems very little to go off of in my opinion

owo