[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/ext/alfredoramos/seometadata/event/listener.php on line 114: Undefined array key 9776522 [phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/ext/alfredoramos/seometadata/event/listener.php on line 114: Trying to access array offset on value of type null Newbie 1837 [Game Over] - Mafiascum.net
Do you think that last game (wishes) was an abnormal situation or do these newbie games tend to be rather low participation? Once I had quit the last game I felt like there was not much fire left in the town. Can we expect that rather than people not vote and not show up at deadline, that there will be an attempt to actually use the lynch this time?
In post 9, garaputo wrote:So the turbohammer day 1 was not unusual? That's unfortunate. I think it's important to toss your vote out there to demonstrate you mean what you say.
I am liking this. This is not necessarily going to help progress the game, but It is more useful than standard RVS.
uhhhhh. This is unless. I know it is hard to blame you because this is RVS, but it would be better if you could try to get us
OUT
of RVS!
In post 18, nancy wrote:kind of ironic that the ic got quicklynched on page 8 in that game, clearly he failed at teaching the basics of mafia one of which is that you don't quicklynch people on page 8
pedit lmao how was i manipulative?
thank you for teaching us the very obv lesson of not quickhammering on page 8.
In post 15, nancy wrote:i was trying to swat a fly earlier with my midi skirt while i was sitting on the toilet but it didn't quite work
uuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh. ok. those IC teaching skills. Teaching us to not try to swat a fly while wearing a skirt on the toilet. Totally useless to me because im a guy and i don't where skirts, but it is more usfull when used in the real world. most ICs teach about mafia which you cant use in the real world!
Location: I ain't hard to find, y'all see me in the Fruits
Post
Post #32 (isolation #8) » Tue Nov 28, 2017 1:47 pm
Postby UC Voyager »
In post 30, nancy wrote:So if you're a newbie and you're not really sure what to post at the start of the game then feel free to just say "Hi I'm here I don't know what to post" or ask a random question about something or do really whatever you feel like (see my posts). On ms we start games with RVS and shoot the shit to get people involved in the game and generating content. It's pretty important to be around as an active presence in the game in whatever capacity you can. Being so active that you choke the thread isn't super helpful but it's still better than not being around at all.
Probably a good idea to keep a tab with the game thread open in your browser so that you have it there as a constant reminder; we'd like you to stick around on the site (if you're a nice person, and I'm sure you are!) so step one is to make it through this game and not forget that it exists.
Also @garaputo am curious what your experience with forum mafia is outside mafiascum?
pedit oh hi UC you're welcome I have all the teachings tips have you seen the new Star Trek I hope you don't like it?
I watch the comedy one!
I am not the biggest fan of the new serious sires, but i love the comedy
Because Acid is not showing many signs of scum, but isn't really trying to get us out of RVS. so it is more of a town lean
you have not contributed and you have extended RVS, but i don't feel the scum
Nancy is trying to teach and help us avoid doing things that help scum. I know they are an IC, but it seems townie.
Gorup isn't trying to extend RVS, and is also asking about good and bad decisions as town. this looks like town trying to do better as town
Location: I ain't hard to find, y'all see me in the Fruits
Post
Post #73 (isolation #20) » Tue Nov 28, 2017 2:45 pm
Postby UC Voyager »
In post 68, sheepsaysmeep wrote:you say you hate rvs
doesnt seem like you act like this in past town games :/
it is a new realization that leaving RVS early will help the town a ton. and it isn't hard to leave RVS. people actually have to give a shit and it is easy
Location: I ain't hard to find, y'all see me in the Fruits
Post
Post #82 (isolation #23) » Tue Nov 28, 2017 2:54 pm
Postby UC Voyager »
Velox
Really not attempting to push the game. just posting useless crap
SheepSaysMeep
saying he will death tunnel!?! Death tunneling rarely gets scum. see here for a game where the town death tunneled two townies.
He is all ready trying to guide a lynch. his reasoning is crap. starting a death tunnel is ad. hinting at starting a death tunnel ON PAGE THREE is worse
Location: I ain't hard to find, y'all see me in the Fruits
Post
Post #95 (isolation #26) » Tue Nov 28, 2017 4:36 pm
Postby UC Voyager »
In post 93, Brian Skies wrote:<<< Shameless deathtunneler. I don't do it with the intention to 'deathtunnel' though. I just like to lynch my scumreads.
VOTE: UCV
I feel like he's trying too hard to appear useful and town. It doesn't seem natural.
I haven't really read that much into the last few pages, but Velox and Sheep both look town to me.
Maybe
Acid, but I would have liked him more if he voted UCV to go along with his comment in 41. The split in focus there bugs me.
I don't think anyone else has done anything I think could be alignment indicative.
Location: I ain't hard to find, y'all see me in the Fruits
Post
Post #99 (isolation #27) » Tue Nov 28, 2017 4:43 pm
Postby UC Voyager »
In post 93, Brian Skies wrote:<<< Shameless deathtunneler. I don't do it with the intention to 'deathtunnel' though. I just like to lynch my scumreads.
VOTE: UCV
I feel like he's trying too hard to appear useful and town. It doesn't seem natural.
I haven't really read that much into the last few pages, but Velox and Sheep both look town to me.
Maybe
Acid, but I would have liked him more if he voted UCV to go along with his comment in 41. The split in focus there bugs me.
I don't think anyone else has done anything I think could be alignment indicative.
In post 95, UC Voyager wrote:because they matter. what if someone asks, what is your reads on X. a simple null will avoid that question, so they might make reads
Or...you can just not state it and people can assume you just don't have a read there. Stating you have a nullread on someone doesn't seem productive.
Why are you so worried about whether someone asks you for that read?
idk because people generally don't assume it. there is nothing wrong with the questions. they are just not necessary.
Location: I ain't hard to find, y'all see me in the Fruits
Post
Post #103 (isolation #29) » Tue Nov 28, 2017 4:52 pm
Postby UC Voyager »
In post 100, Brigadoon wrote:Your read list came across as pretty unnatural, felt like you were townreading and buddying up to the experienced players.
because they will be the ones that won't notice that. why would i buddy this early any ways. You wait til later on when your scu and you buddy the conf town.
It's very showy. Like you're putting on a performance.
In post 99, UC Voyager wrote:2. So you haven't read. are you just assuming you will read that way. i smell the confbiasing at work
I have read the pages. I just haven't picked apart every post or anything of that nature. I dunno why you'd read that any other way.
In post 99, UC Voyager wrote:3. so acid isn't as townie because he didn't vote me even though he showed no reason to?
I think he stated a perfectly valid suspicion (townlean). Whether he wanted to vote on it or not is his choice. Yes, I'm going to judge him based on what he does and how he does it.
In post 99, UC Voyager wrote:4. how about Sheep talking about tunneling. how about the fact velox dragged RVS when RVS doesn't help town?
you know what. fuck it. im not allowed to fucking try to progress the game to win because the fucking scum!fucks will jump all over that and then everyone sheeps the idea
Location: I ain't hard to find, y'all see me in the Fruits
Post
Post #111 (isolation #33) » Tue Nov 28, 2017 5:06 pm
Postby UC Voyager »
In post 88, nancy wrote:I don't think deathtunneling is a very pleasant way to play mafia and is probably worth avoiding for that reason alone.
UC I'm not entirely sure why you jumped to deathtunnel in response to say sheep saying they felt like they might be tunneling? There's a pretty significant difference between a tunnel and a deathtunnel and all I'm seeing in that post from sheep is him checking himself on his read. Do you think there's mafia motivation for what sheep is doing or are you just annoyed that he's not townreading you or something else?
no. i was annoyed with the death tunnel/tunnel idea because it is stupid. I now realize that he was saying somthing different..
Would also like it if you talked about your reasoning for why you think Brigdoon could be mafia because I don't find the reasoning you put forth convincing at all and I'm not sure I understand what you were getting at there.
HINT: my first post against him was only semi-serious
pedit yeah I can't keep up
I am not liking the way Brian is describing his case. I didn't twist words, i miss read. i did not say i was helpful, i was explaining why i was trying to get out of RVS, n such.
Location: I ain't hard to find, y'all see me in the Fruits
Post
Post #154 (isolation #39) » Wed Nov 29, 2017 5:48 am
Postby UC Voyager »
In post 140, Velox wrote:I'd like him to explain this more and it's funny when he gets mad
this is not a good
intentionally trying to get someone mad, so they arn't playing as good is not funny. it was a strategy i used in my newbie scum game, so that the town did not do as well.
This could just be a bad joke coming from a townie, so I will not vote this, but i am definitely getting a scum lean from the Velox slot.
Location: I ain't hard to find, y'all see me in the Fruits
Post
Post #155 (isolation #40) » Wed Nov 29, 2017 5:49 am
Postby UC Voyager »
In post 147, acidphoenix wrote:mostly ucvs game is filled with cringeworthy generically wolfy things, and Patrick seems noobish enough that simultaneously having a bunch of trs already and one of them being ucv seems weird, especially if he hasn't played with ucv
I have been town read by people i have never played with before. lol
In post 124, patrick2 wrote:patrick2, uc voyager, brianskies and sheepsaysmeep all read town
Hey patrick2. Would you be able to provide some reasoning for whichever of those reads you feel most strongly about? How confident are you in each of those reads roughly speaking?
I have very strong meta on patrick2 and this is definitely his town game. UC Voyager is all over the place, scattered, paranoid, questioning everything. I like that. I think Brian shows good scumhunting and depth in his reads and tbh the read on sheep is a gut one.
patrick2 - like 95% confident
uc voyager - 80%
brian - like 62%
sheep - 60%
Why only 95%. Did your PM have messy hand writing?
Location: I ain't hard to find, y'all see me in the Fruits
Post
Post #205 (isolation #50) » Wed Nov 29, 2017 6:57 pm
Postby UC Voyager »
In post 204, sheepsaysmeep wrote:velox still has yet to say smth about someone that's not ucv and i dont like it
nancy what are your reads?
it's hard to meta match ucv since ive played one game with ucv where the entire game he thought he was conftown or smth :/
no. i should have been conf town, but yall were kind of dumb
In post 204, sheepsaysmeep wrote:velox still has yet to say smth about someone that's not ucv and i dont like it
nancy what are your reads?
it's hard to meta match ucv since ive played one game with ucv where the entire game he thought he was conftown or smth :/
no. i should have been conf town, but yall were kind of dumb
you still dont understand the setup :/
you were not dumb. you were a great scum. I have found you don't lynch a claim. you wait and see how log that claim lasts. if i were going into day 5, claimed doctor day 2, yea. scum read me
In post 203, nancy wrote:would very much like it if people were doing a little less calling each other scum and more asking for and sharing their thoughts on things
But it's like, they be wanting to snatch all our people up and you want us to be civil? Idk, I feel it should be more like
Also, for someone asking for everyone to be transparent and ask each other stuff, I don't think you've shared any of your opinions thus far.
- 4/10 tone scummy and i feel like he's overdefensive; his attack on nancy wasnt good
Velox
- 2.5/10 he has nothing to say about anyone except ucv; i really dont like that plus he seemed to wagon onto ucv opportunistically although someone might have said that earlier
patrick2
- 5/10 he's null to inactivity although the place where he says he's 9.5/10 town from meta is rlly scummy
Brigadoon
- 6/10 through a quick iso i see some game solvign motivation from this slot
UC Voyager
- 3/10 his trying to get us out of rvs early feels like trying to get towncred; attacks are rlly weak and bad
Brian Skies
- 6.5/10 whenever he has thoughts i usually agree with them or understand where theyre coming from especially 217, and gut
acidphoenix
- 5/10 null bc hasnt been on since rvs
nancy
- 5.5/10:most posts are ic posts; barely any actual reads coming from this slot altho the ones that i do see make sense
These reads make no since.
So velox is scum for only targeting me, but in obv scum for trying to get of RVS early?
Gara is also scum wvwn though he has spoken against my arguments and voted velox?
Location: I ain't hard to find, y'all see me in the Fruits
Post
Post #238 (isolation #54) » Thu Nov 30, 2017 12:03 pm
Postby UC Voyager »
Current thoughts
I don't like Sheepsaysmeep's reads. They do not sync together very well. they seem like they are bent
Acid Phoenix is probably town, and this mainly just gut feeling.
Brigadoon is still hard to read. His posts seem to not be very alignment indicative
Nancy is putting a huge effort into the game. I like this, but what i don't like is how she is mostly trying to explain other people's post and not making her own statements. I know she is an IC, but she can still make her own reads. I am still very unclear on what her current mindset is
Velox seems more like a joking town and not a scum. Maybe im taking my gut read to far, but still. I don't see the scum motive behind his posts
BrianSkies has not posted enough for me to read
I did not like Gara's push on Velox. it seemed very bad. They were only using one post to go off of at the time.
the explanation for your mindset read on Velox makes sense but I think you've failed to explain how that behavior comes from mafia and doesn't come from town; I've personally seen a ton of town players provoke people for their own amusement and I think if you're reading alignment into it there has to be more than what you've given here. Couple other things still giving me pause there:
a) the strength of your read in relation to the amount of content from that slot is in my opinion exceptional and if you don't think it's exceptional could you lay out why for me? If that involves citing meta from mtgs where you've gotten hard reads from very little content as town that's acceptable but also think you should be able to argue in clear terms without that why you feel a hard scumread from ~2-3 posts here isn't exceptional; e.g., talking to Regfan yesterday he highlighted for me why he felt a particular post was scummy and how he got a strong scumread from it, think that was pretty exceptional but the depth of his explanation matched the read; not looking for lots of words from you, just something that helps me see that the behavior you're seeing strongly comes from mafia and not town; I think your desire to emphasize your vote on Velox lines up well with your earlier stated preference for using your vote to sign that you're serious but what I'm not understanding here is why and what that means to you;
b) while I can believe you genuinely think that that behavior comes from mafia based on your explanation, you're saying in the next paragraph down that you think it's anti-town behavior, which is it and where's the mix-up there coming from? Very aware that Velox's behavior is anti-town and that's really where my confusion is coming from since I don't think that anti-town behavior alone merits a strong scumread.
My question, "Do you think that applies to anyone else as well?", is referring to anyone else in this game; if you're not sensing that I'm trying to push any specific outcome is there anyone else here who also isn't trying to do that? Basically a leading question because I'm wondering why you're townreading me for this and not other players and the followup for this that I was going to ask when you responded but I'll do it now was why that alone is enough of a reason to give me a townread this early. Also not seeing you questioning the basis for that read at all even after I've told you that if I were mafia I very probably would not be letting slip any agenda which is what you're townreading me for so why are you not concerned that you're being pocketed here?
Cute kitten for levity:
The other things I was looking at that I felt were mildly scummy were your response to Brigadoon's readslist mentioning that you'd pointed out two flaws not one in UC's argumentation; think that's scummy because you don't seem interested in understanding her there nor in challenging any of her positions which I think you would be more inclined to do if you were trying to sort her alignment; think this also shows in your earlier 92 to UC where you've responded with a passive take on his post that doesn't really comment in any substantive way and doesn't display any interest in what's going on between UC and sheep wrt the tunnel and people scumreading UC for that. Not really understanding the tack you're taking in your follow-up to that in 134 or why you think that line of questioning will help you sort UC's alignment.
And finally I think the way that you play both sides of the argument in 143/145 without seeming invested in either in any way that makes me feel like you're really interested in digging into what they're thinking about the game to get a read on them is at least a little bit more likely to come from mafia than town here. None of these are strong points but they're definitely things I'm noticing and keeping in mind as I continue to try to assess my read on you.
I've reread this post (left it fully intact above for context) The section starting "The other things that I was looking at that I felt were mildly scummy" still seems to be a list of things that are in no way scummy. They seem focused on the presumptive opinion that all my posts must be trying to determine if someone is scum, and that clarifying facts and logic are not helpful things. I don't accept this as a valid thought process.
OK.
I do not like this post at all.
The issue is I do not see the town motivation for it. I can see the scum motivation for it.
I would expect a townie to not defend like this. It does not help the game at all. I would expect a townie to be doing more scum hunting then light defending.
Here. I could see the scum motivation
Here, you dismiss the points saying "they are not scummy at all". Then you try to say why they are townie. The scum motivation is that scum want people to see them as town. You are trying to explain why you are town.
Location: I ain't hard to find, y'all see me in the Fruits
Post
Post #314 (isolation #59) » Fri Dec 01, 2017 5:58 pm
Postby UC Voyager »
In post 306, nancy wrote:Eh, I shouldn't say zero reasoning, it's the basis for that reasoning that I'm missing.
pedit if you care about the game being solved you should be working with other people, especially your townreads; saying you refuse to work with me is ??? and you can say you don't care but if I mislynch you then both of us are going to care very much. Like, I ask you questions and you basically say "I don't have to answer that if I don't want to you're doing it wrong". Not helpful to me at all doesn't do anything to convince me you're town.
You seem to focused on Gara. Telling him what he should and should not do, but thinking about it. You are honestly preventing Gara from doing anything besides answering your questions and responding to you. I do not see the scum hunt behind your posts. You keep telling people what to do, but you are not doing it.