[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/ext/alfredoramos/seometadata/event/listener.php on line 114: Undefined array key 9935976 [phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/ext/alfredoramos/seometadata/event/listener.php on line 114: Trying to access array offset on value of type null Newbie 1852: Game over - Mafiascum.net
Post
Post #21 (isolation #3) » Thu Feb 08, 2018 1:27 pm
Postby Flubbernugget »
So I was about to note I was voting JB for not voting me but still shading me, but that seems to have changed.
James, your trichotomy is strange. How is saying I'm going to omgus aggressive? Omgus is pretty common in RVS. How am I not taking the game seriously? Why does scum say they're going to omgus over town?
Post
Post #49 (isolation #5) » Thu Feb 08, 2018 5:21 pm
Postby Flubbernugget »
I don't think James is scum from their push anymore. I'll double check what you saw on him, but it makes zero sense to retract your claim so early if you're fishing for reactions.
Post
Post #53 (isolation #7) » Thu Feb 08, 2018 5:25 pm
Postby Flubbernugget »
In post 24, James Brafin wrote:Why do you only benefit from claiming here? Also, I'm pretty sure I know your role now. If you want to know why, 'Ferno and I are buds. That's all you should need to know.
1) it makes sense to be suspicious of you being the only benificary of your claim. You should be playing as a team, particularly as scum.
Post
Post #55 (isolation #8) » Thu Feb 08, 2018 5:27 pm
Postby Flubbernugget »
I'm not up to speed on the new setup to dig through what RC is doing right now. I honestly forgot the setup changed and just assumed matrix 6 till he mentioned breaking it.
Post
Post #69 (isolation #14) » Thu Feb 08, 2018 5:48 pm
Postby Flubbernugget »
I've already explained why I read jame's suspicion as legitimate. If you want to pressure James you there's plenty of fish in the rest of the town to rally with. I'm not faking a read for a reaction test.
Post
Post #165 (isolation #15) » Fri Feb 09, 2018 11:23 am
Postby Flubbernugget »
Although I can respect impede not wanting to commit to early reads, I would still expect them as town to have suspicions that don't involve chastising RC.
Brass made a pretty meh case against kiana, but they otherwise look town now.
UNVOTE:
My vote will probably end up on impede, but I would like to look at the james/kiana argument again.
Post
Post #167 (isolation #17) » Fri Feb 09, 2018 11:31 am
Postby Flubbernugget »
VOTE: impede for now.
I don't believe jame's points on kiana, which mostly revolve around what looks logical/illogical and how that relates to alignment. I don't like their inability to form reads though. I'm not ready to attribute that to scum yet though. If kiana is new to the game and just got drilled that hard, their interaction with James could be town.
Post
Post #302 (isolation #21) » Sat Feb 10, 2018 9:41 am
Postby Flubbernugget »
In post 285, brassherald wrote:Lots has happened during my date night last night. I'm closer to null on James right now than before because some really good points were made about him.
That being said, there is one person who posted a few times and I still don't feel good about.
VOTE: Huntress
Something feels off with her posts, and while I cannot quite put my finger on it, I'm going to go with my gut instinct for her. Still FoS at Kiana.
Early game poe leaves me suspicious, and I don't think your town cases are convincing enough to follow through voting like this.
Post
Post #451 (isolation #27) » Tue Feb 13, 2018 4:17 am
Postby Flubbernugget »
The text generator vote on huntress bothers me because they have felt under the radar this whole game. I'll have to check to see if there's more to that than (relatively) low activity.
Post
Post #546 (isolation #30) » Wed Feb 14, 2018 4:58 am
Postby Flubbernugget »
I can play a pretty aggressive scum game where I split hairs to win arguments, and I kind of get that vibe from bk444. I haven't actually tried to understand the semantics of his arguments though. That's going to be on the back burner with a dissection of why text makes me uncomfortable.
I'm very much playing a lazy game at the moment, but outside of mafia I've been very mentally fatigued, and reserving the times I'm able to focus for school.
Post
Post #921 (isolation #35) » Sat Feb 17, 2018 3:24 am
Postby Flubbernugget »
I'm not fond of a compromise compromise lynch onto a lurker D1 in the slightest.
I know I said I was going to check the semantics of BK's arguments but after seeing more of his posting I don't find this necessary. I've never considered omgus a scumtell, and in this case particularly it looks like aggression and immaturity more than scum. Honestly, I'm suspicious of this all being framed as read 180s without any context of the bigger picture.
I still have noting on text. That's my next endeavor.
Post
Post #930 (isolation #38) » Sat Feb 17, 2018 4:17 pm
Postby Flubbernugget »
In post 924, the worst wrote:Caught up quickly. If anyone is waiting on something from me I missed it.
I agree with Flub, OMGUS is garbage as a standalone scumtell. If anything it seems slightly more intuitive for town to OMGUS vote. still a flimsy tell at best.
BK's OMGUS 180 thing isn't related to my scumread on him. He seems to be coasting by throwing shade for the most part. It's actually his flip flops and moves around other wagons which have been bothering me.
Still feel eeehhh about Huntress. RC are you waiting for something from her or am I brainfarting?
Very interested to see what James comes up with post VLA.
So, the 180 thing isn't scummy, but all the other 180 things are?
Post
Post #1136 (isolation #45) » Fri Feb 23, 2018 2:15 pm
Postby Flubbernugget »
In post 1114, James Brafin wrote:Well, "super active" is a stretch, I suppose. But when the have been active, they have hunted. You, on the other hand, don't strike me as working very hard to out scum.
@RC: I thought you had an innocent on Kiana? (Making my scumteam flubber/soul the scumteam. I misread your post, sry.)
Post
Post #1141 (isolation #48) » Fri Feb 23, 2018 2:28 pm
Postby Flubbernugget »
In post 1139, the worst wrote:I'm sorry does one need to be offensive to be town?
The only people I have any intention of offending are stupid assholes who think "nice" people are exclusively scum.
I don't mean offensive as in caustic. It's more how safe you're playing the game. Nothing felt like a commitment or push from you yesterday.
In post 1139, the worst wrote:I'm sorry does one need to be offensive to be town?
The only people I have any intention of offending are stupid assholes who think "nice" people are exclusively scum.
I don't mean offensive as in caustic. It's more how safe you're playing the game. Nothing felt like a commitment or push from you yesterday.
By that logic do you townread yourself?
Yes, and if by some anti-miracle the town finds some veracity in your current push I'll detail it.
Post
Post #1209 (isolation #55) » Mon Feb 26, 2018 3:33 pm
Postby Flubbernugget »
In post 1194, James Brafin wrote:Despite reservations of scum, I'm sorry to see her go.
However, though I feel that most replaces are NAI, this one strikes me as scum-aligned. Replacing out because "the game is bad" and "you are dead to me" is kind of weak.
In post 1194, James Brafin wrote:Despite reservations of scum, I'm sorry to see her go.
However, though I feel that most replaces are NAI, this one strikes me as scum-aligned. Replacing out because "the game is bad" and "you are dead to me" is kind of weak.
uh, no. there was no pressure on kiana at all
first off: unvote
second off: this not followed by a vote?
I have two scum reads, and I don't think scum posts a rapid fire of posts that can quickly be looked up as bullshit. I've actually pushed through a mislynch as scum doing that before.
Post
Post #1246 (isolation #58) » Tue Feb 27, 2018 4:34 pm
Postby Flubbernugget »
Anyway, your reaction schtick is boring me. And it's stupid to think voting me is going to get you a readable reaction from me. The correct play as either alignment is to wait for you to confirm whether or not your guilty is on me and cc vote you if you say it is.