Palm of suspicion?In post 148, rulerBob8 wrote:PoS? What's that?
Like FoS but more.
This would be very refreshing. Please do post these reads.In post 107, Fire Starter wrote:I will comment on everything after work (pinky promise, I actually have some reads) but I think we should claim. Like I said before, the point is to win.
Explain or reads.In post 152, Fire Starter wrote:Im actually holding on that for the moment. If I need to explain at a later date I will.
withhold specific points if you need to, you really should at least post something thoughIn post 152, Fire Starter wrote:Im actually holding on that for the moment. If I need to explain at a later date I will.
Okay if you're going to do that, at least type my name correctly.In post 155, Fire Starter wrote:Obviously
Sorry. I hate being town. Its boring so I procrastinate.
VOTE: SlingShotWaffles
Ignoring the early debate of who took what joke seriously, as it could have easily been opportunistic scum(but from his gameplay it doesnt seem to be the case, but im bad), the thing that really bothers me is him asking if the tracker should claim. Brain farts happen but I literally cant wrap my head around this.
The mistake was apparently thinking no one claimed BP. Thatd be fine if everyone had already claimed. Not everyone did since BP claimed almost immediately. My issue is that and the fact that it seems like a cover up to hide the fact that he seems to know the setup has a tracker. Wants the tracker to claim, realizes he shouldn't know the setup, covers it up with a brain fart.
Uh... yeah.In post 157, Keychain wrote:HOLD UP. Is Slingshot at L-1?
I thought you weren't giving reads to stop people from being NK'd?
Like, if you don't want to give reads then don't. But don't say you have reads and then flat out refuse to back that statement up. It's anti-town as hell and if you're actually town it just screws everyone else over.In post 161, Fire Starter wrote:What slip up did I make? Not revealing my reads? Ok. Nor do I plan to unless you explain why I have to. What purpose does it serve town RIGHT NOW in this hotshotpancake situation? I may be stubborn as fuck but I like to think I'm being more than reasonable by trying to prevent scum from basing any kills or lynches off my reads this early in the game.
I didn't even notice I was being pocketed, good point.In post 164, Keychain wrote:I think Acid's vote on Ferastical is well placed, if not really well reasoned. Ferastical has stuck to Draynth like glue for three instances now: when Draynth first joined the game he unvoted before his read through. Ferastical immediately dropped his RVS vote on Brandi based on uncertainty, which seemed out of the blue to me. When Draynth opposed the BP/Not BP claim strategy, he promptly followed suit with a slightly overboard attack and a vote on Slingshot. And when Draynth finally agreed to the claim strategy, Ferastical immediately questioned whether they were going to be claiming. Looks like a pattern to me.
Why are you asking me? I just might be the scum afterall and point at people who are supposedly "scum", just to get them out of sight and my job easier. But as a wise man said: "Communication is the key" and so I take it as you think of me as no other then a simple townie.
Nice research, bro, I didn't even notice that.In post 164, Keychain wrote: I think Acid's vote on Ferastical is well placed, if not really well reasoned. Ferastical has stuck to Draynth like glue for three instances now: when Draynth first joined the game he unvoted before his read through. Ferastical immediately dropped his RVS vote on Brandi based on uncertainty, which seemed out of the blue to me. When Draynth opposed the BP/Not BP claim strategy, he promptly followed suit with a slightly overboard attack and a vote on Slingshot. And when Draynth finally agreed to the claim strategy, Ferastical immediately questioned whether they were going to be claiming. Looks like a pattern to me.
I posted a ton of messages above, read them for further information.In post 162, Fire Starter wrote:Rereading and it seems that the votes from Brandi and Ferastical are from forever ago(pardon me not remembering votes that had nothing to do with the current situation), so I would like to hear their thoughts and ifthey still are fine with voting him.
Isn't this really the same thing as the reason you're voting Slingshot for?In post 161, Fire Starter wrote:I always call when I put someone at L-1 if it's intended. I didnt realize Brandi was still voting him.
L-1 on Slingshotwaffles
This feels like you knew you messed up and are trying to divert attention away from it.In post 161, Fire Starter wrote: What slip up did I make? Not revealing my reads?
Because it seemed as if you were trying to pocket me so I'd like to know if you have any thoughts.In post 168, Ferastical wrote:Why are you asking me? I just might be the scum afterall and point at people who are supposedly "scum", just to get them out of sight and my job easier. But as a wise man said: "Communication is the key" and so I take it as you think of me as no other then a simple townie.
RulerBob8 already claimed BP in 116 and since noone counter-claimed it's believable, good to know anyway.
This feels kind of forcedIn post 169, Ferastical wrote:As far as this goes you've probably started to realise I'm claiming to be townie, so that's what I do.
I claim to be Townie.