Posted: Thu Jan 10, 2019 3:35 pm
Meanwhile were wasting the day which is what scum wants.
I'm glad you are actually doing somethingIn post 650, YellowSnow wrote:Meanwhile were wasting the day which is what scum wants.
Of course one prior game doesn't give me a "meta" on yellow, it just happens to be one more game than I've played vs. anyone else here. I'm mainly pushing back on the notion that he's crafty scum. He could be scum, but my limited experience in both games suggests he's more guileless than crafty.In post 649, JunkoChan wrote:@GrandWazoo I don't like metagaming individual players, there's merit in looking for player's past games to try to catch how they play as scum or town, but playstyles may change with experience, for instance I believe I change my approach to mafia games every other game, you get new ideas from each game.
on topic, if Yellow wasn't acting like he is right now I would remove my vote, but more often than not, noob scums crack like this to pressure
I am not defending him, only pointing out that yellow isn't the criminal mastermind you seem to think he is.In post 655, Junk wrote:GW defending Yellow (who is scum) is bad look for GW.
I am town and you have had town and scum reads on every literally player in this game. Not to mention lolhammering compfan. Bad look bruh.GW, if you're town, you have had completely wrong reads the entire game so far, lol.
*shivers*In post 656, Junk wrote:Junko-chan, from now on, call me Junk-senpai, please.
do you care enough to write more than one sentence posts?In post 662, YellowSnow wrote:Junk is entirely wrong about me and needs to stop.
In post 661, brassherald wrote:@mod did Yyotta get prodded and I just missed it?
I would also like to actually hear from vesper, this slot has been pretty much nonexistent so far.
alright this is fair - but I'm expecting a follow up. especially on what you look at with respect to me - I'm not really sure how you'd decide whether scum!me would take a shot at the worst here based on my past games so I want to see that thought processIn post 638, brassherald wrote:I need some time to really analyze who's playing and considering who takes the NK. Ideally, I'd like to have a day 2 gamesolve.
First step is that tonight when I finally can sit down and read, I review the thread and see what happened. Put the pieces I now know in place and see what comes of them. Second, I need to look into the games you linked for your scum since I really don't know that you, in particular, take that shot at the worst.
And just for the record on not believing doc claims as town, I think you might have been in the game where I as VT tunneled, I want to say UCVoyager, who was town doctor, even after his claim. I don't just automatically believe a PR claim because in my very first game on site, the mafia had a PR claim which was not CCed and we mislynched town due to it. I trusted it without question that game, and I don't ever want to do that again.
I got the sense he was faking that slip to try to come off as newbie town - I don't see how it relates to the exchange you had about scum v town probabilities. The only thing I see out of Yellow is attempts to make other players look bad and plays at self-defense. Especially considering his D1 commentary on you, I still can't grok your townread on him here.In post 648, GrandWazoo wrote:This is regarding several reactions to yellow's failure to comprehend the 9 setups, which was definitely an obtuse oversight but not scummy imo. Junko expressed surprise that such a "cold minded" and "smart" player as yellow would commit such a faux pas (Junk agreed). That exchange between me and yellow about scum vs. town probabilities alone should render both Junko's adjectives non-operational. OTOH it's not the kind of inane argument I'd expect scum to actively engage in the first place. I get why you're scumreading yellow, but if you look at that other game (1906) you'll see the same kind of behavior.