Dance of the Title Fairy: Accepting Applications

[Annadog40]

It happens too much.

[Papa Zito]

What's wrong with saying you think a title is bad?

People seem to have this impression that one "anti-nom" = one "nom" so instead of the threshold being 5 noms it's now anti-noms + 5.

nomnomnom

I don't think that was what Psyche actually intended and there's also how a lot of these anti-noms don't have much reasoning behind them.

[Annadog40]

It makes me reluctant since people just go

"Anti-nom, bad title"

[Ginngie]

I think it's literally impossible to have a title suggested an someone goes "i think it's shite"

[Thestatusquo]

The title fairy being too demographic is a bad thing imo.

[mastina]

Boy I remember the days were title fairy policy discussion happened in the title fairy discussion thread rather than in the thread which is supposed to be nominations-specific. Wasn't that a nice thing.

[vonflare]

but it's easier this way, having all relevant info in one thread.

that's like having separate threads for the anonymous questions to be posted in and for the community answers.

[Annadog40]

Boy I remember the days were title fairy policy discussion happened in the title fairy discussion thread rather than in the thread which is supposed to be nominations-specific. Wasn't that a nice thing.

Could always bump that thread with relevant information to get condensation there instead of posting your compaint in the thread where you didn't want the conversation to be.

[Alchemist21]

The title fairy being too demographic is a bad thing imo.

Was this supposed to say democratic?

[Thestatusquo]

We'll never know.

[Cheery Dog]

It makes me reluctant since people just go

"Anti-nom, bad title"

Those ones are meaningless, because it's not well-reasoned.

[Psyche]

People seem to have this impression that one "anti-nom" = one "nom" so instead of the threshold being 5 noms it's now anti-noms + 5.

what does this impression really impact though if good titles that have 5 noms still get approved

[Papa Zito]

People seem to have this impression that one "anti-nom" = one "nom" so instead of the threshold being 5 noms it's now anti-noms + 5.

what does this impression really impact though if good titles that have 5 noms still get approved

It impacts what gets posted in this thread, clearly.

[Gorny]

Nom Whemestar for "quack quack"

[Psyche]

People seem to have this impression that one "anti-nom" = one "nom" so instead of the threshold being 5 noms it's now anti-noms + 5.

what does this impression really impact though if good titles that have 5 noms still get approved

It impacts what gets posted in this thread, clearly.

how / like what

[Annadog40]

It makes me more reluctant to put a nom up if full of anti-noms for a bunch of titles.

Nom Whemestar for "quack quack"

What is the reason?

[Gorny]

His signature "I'm a dog that quacks."

[UC Voyager]

nom

Gorny for

im batman, not Bruce

[Alisae]

Stop trying to fucking force titles this is a process that is handled with a lot of care.

[vonflare]

maybe make an account age restriction on who can post/view this subforum?

[Alisae]

That's also stupid because excluding people isn't nice

[beeboy]

That's also stupid because excluding people isn't nice

edit: I am just going to edit this in instead of double posting, I think people should be ok with the title fairy thread having periods of inactivity rather then trying to force titles whenever this thread gets inactive for an extended period of time.

[Alisae]

Actually
This might be a good one

Nominate HolySpiritTurtle for

I Deleted My Main

Context
Beeboy dared GiF to delete his main during a truth and dare session on sitechat
He did it

[beeboy]

Nth I Deleted My Main

[Papa Zito]

Beeboy dared GiF to delete his main during a truth and dare session on sitechat
He did it

memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=20765 ?