Page 55 of 59

Posted: Sun Oct 21, 2012 6:53 pm
by SleepyKrew
Just because it's better than bad suggestions doesn't mean it's good.

Posted: Sun Oct 21, 2012 6:56 pm
by killerjester
Being better than the others isn't why I think it's good.

Posted: Sun Oct 21, 2012 7:05 pm
by realgodfather
hey who deleted my post

it was a valid suggestion

Posted: Sun Oct 21, 2012 7:42 pm
by Empking
In post 1341, SleepyKrew wrote:The problem with Mishter Mash sounding like Monster Mash is that Mishter doesn't sound like Monster.


No that was the brilliance of the title. Since OS had redacted that explanation then it sucks again.

Posted: Sun Oct 21, 2012 7:46 pm
by Oman
In post 1352, realgodfather wrote:hey who deleted my post

it was a valid suggestion


I did, and it wasn't.

Posted: Sun Oct 21, 2012 9:18 pm
by UberNinja
nth
but only because of the above post ;)

I think the Connery voice thing is way better than the "monster mash" thing but either way Mishter Mash just works.

Glad this discussion was had. Until next time.

Posted: Sun Oct 21, 2012 9:25 pm
by izakthegoomba
In post 1348, quadz08 wrote:Have you never heard the man speak? Imagine him saying "Mister Mash."

That said, I don't see what Sean Connery has to do with the title. >_>

Wait... when did you hear me speak?

Posted: Sun Oct 21, 2012 9:27 pm
by Nexus
Izak, do you like Mishter Mash? If you don't, then we can end this discussion right now.

Posted: Sun Oct 21, 2012 11:49 pm
by N
In post 1356, izakthegoomba wrote:
In post 1348, quadz08 wrote:Have you never heard the man speak? Imagine him saying "Mister Mash."

That said, I don't see what Sean Connery has to do with the title. >_>

Wait... when did you hear me speak?

I think he's talking about Sean Connery. Unless you're saying you sound like Sean Connery?

Posted: Mon Oct 22, 2012 4:39 am
by quadz08
^ what N said

Posted: Mon Oct 22, 2012 6:26 am
by Oversoul
This last page has just been a complete breakdown of communication lmfao.

Posted: Mon Oct 22, 2012 7:44 am
by kdowns
I think everyone prefers "Goddamnit" over "Goddamnit, kdowns"

Posted: Mon Oct 22, 2012 7:47 am
by izakthegoomba
In post 1357, Nexus wrote:Izak, do you like Mishter Mash? If you don't, then we can end this discussion right now.

Eeeeeh. It's ok, but I'm not in love with it.

In post 1361, kdowns wrote:I think everyone prefers "Goddamnit" over "Goddamnit, kdowns"

Everyone-1

Posted: Mon Oct 22, 2012 8:58 am
by Umbrage
Nom izak for
seanconnerythemishmasher


OK I'll stop now.

Posted: Mon Oct 22, 2012 9:00 am
by SleepyKrew
I think it works both with and without the kdowns.

Posted: Mon Oct 22, 2012 9:13 am
by Flameaxe
I vote for with kdowns.

Posted: Mon Oct 22, 2012 9:42 am
by quadz08
I vote with kdowns.

Posted: Mon Oct 22, 2012 9:44 am
by saulres
With.

Without it, it'll look like that's something kdowns says all the time to others, not the other way around.

Posted: Mon Oct 22, 2012 10:00 am
by UberNinja
Yeah, with is probably better.

Vote: with
(and
allcaps
, and
no punctuation
) :P

Posted: Mon Oct 22, 2012 10:07 am
by SleepyKrew
No UN. Then it's not the same thing.

Posted: Mon Oct 22, 2012 10:14 am
by kdowns
GODDAMNIT KDOWNS?

Posted: Mon Oct 22, 2012 10:54 am
by xRECKONERx
It doesn't need the kdowns part, it's repetitive.

i could see
GODDAMMIT
,
goddammit
, even maybe adding a comma afterwards:
GODDAMMIT,
or
goddammit,


I personally think the last one is the way to go since his username is in all lowercase.

Posted: Mon Oct 22, 2012 10:59 am
by quadz08
I actually really like
goddamimit,
with the comma.

Posted: Mon Oct 22, 2012 11:18 am
by izakthegoomba
Needs to have an N.

Also I believe the original quote was in caps.

Posted: Mon Oct 22, 2012 11:22 am
by zoraster
it should not have an n unless part of the joke is that it's nonstandard spelling. even for brits...