Dance of the Title Fairy: Pale Moonlight Edition

Nahdia · Post Post #2500 (ISO) » Fri May 20, 2016 11:44 am

jesus the site is broked

Papa Zito · Post Post #2501 (ISO) » Fri May 20, 2016 11:48 am

epic nom

InflatablePie · Post Post #2502 (ISO) » Fri May 20, 2016 12:03 pm

well that's 7

do ur job sleepykrew

Egg · Post Post #2503 (ISO) » Fri May 20, 2016 12:10 pm

Aris are you getting this weird thing where everything works fine until you hit submit and then it never really loads so you hit it again and again and realize it went through the first time? I'm posting on my phone too and I've been getting that tonight.

drmyshottyizsik · Post Post #2504 (ISO) » Fri May 20, 2016 12:11 pm

In post 2508, Egg wrote:Aris are you getting this weird thing where everything works fine until you hit submit and then it never really loads so you hit it again and again and realize it went through the first time? I'm posting on my phone too and I've been getting that tonight.

redirect to post sent page is taking a long time

Psyche · Post Post #2505 (ISO) » Fri May 20, 2016 12:12 pm

there is no excuse im clicking report

Psyche · Post Post #2506 (ISO) » Fri May 20, 2016 12:14 pm

hmm it's a pretty easy problem to locate
most forums have an easy fix to it

drmyshottyizsik · Post Post #2507 (ISO) » Fri May 20, 2016 12:24 pm

In post 2512, Psyche wrote:hmm it's a pretty easy problem to locate
most forums have an easy fix to it

It's probably the servers

Aristophanes · Post Post #2508 (ISO) » Fri May 20, 2016 12:42 pm

In post 2508, Egg wrote:Aris are you getting this weird thing where everything works fine until you hit submit and then it never really loads so you hit it again and again and realize it went through the first time? I'm posting on my phone too and I've been getting that tonight.

Exactly this!
Apparently worse than I thought :S

Psyche · Post Post #2509 (ISO) » Fri May 20, 2016 12:52 pm

In post 2513, drmyshottyizsik wrote:
In post 2512, Psyche wrote:hmm it's a pretty easy problem to locate
most forums have an easy fix to it
It's probably the servers

no i mean
most forums prevent people from making duplicate posts or quick successive posts
this is a problem every forum sort of sees; not quite a server error unless it's making pages load more slowly

Ranger · Post Post #2510 (ISO) » Fri May 20, 2016 1:00 pm

Nth BUSSED SO HARD.

nominate clumsy for Treehouse Horror Story or something along those lines for spamming discussions of a treehouse with me to make me think he was town in Buzzfeed Upick

Treehouse Of Horrors
À la Simpsons

I'll

second

this; I like Treehouse Of Horrors in particular.

Fire Assassin · Post Post #2511 (ISO) » Fri May 20, 2016 1:01 pm

Thats a lame title.

SleepyKrew · Post Post #2512 (ISO) » Fri May 20, 2016 1:49 pm

In post 0, SleepyKrew wrote:Users are allowed to participate in discussions about their own potential titles, but they will preferably take a back-seat role. Do not try to steer the discussion on your own title.

Have I ever had to enforce this one before? I don't remember having to. Well, I am now.

BUSSED SO HARD

is dead.

I've cleaned out the multiposts as well.

dramonic · Post Post #2513 (ISO) » Fri May 20, 2016 1:51 pm

It was a really shitty nom anyways

drmyshottyizsik · Post Post #2514 (ISO) » Fri May 20, 2016 1:52 pm

In post 2512, SleepyKrew wrote:
In post 0, SleepyKrew wrote:Users are allowed to participate in discussions about their own potential titles, but they will preferably take a back-seat role. Do not try to steer the discussion on your own title.
Have I ever had to enforce this one before? I don't remember having to. Well, I am now.
BUSSED SO HARD
is dead.

I've cleaned out the multiposts as well.

It wasn't my idea, and it was nth'd by like 10 people.

SleepyKrew · Post Post #2515 (ISO) » Fri May 20, 2016 1:54 pm

That changes nothing.

drmyshottyizsik · Post Post #2516 (ISO) » Fri May 20, 2016 2:01 pm

In post 2512, SleepyKrew wrote:
In post 0, SleepyKrew wrote:Users are allowed to participate in discussions about their own potential titles, but they will preferably take a back-seat role. Do not try to steer the discussion on your own title.
Have I ever had to enforce this one before? I don't remember having to. Well, I am now.
BUSSED SO HARD
is dead.

I've cleaned out the multiposts as well.

I seriously didn't try to steer anything and you know it. This is personal and I know I won't change your mind. This is sad though.

Papa Zito · Post Post #2517 (ISO) » Fri May 20, 2016 2:02 pm

Psyche · Post Post #2518 (ISO) » Fri May 20, 2016 2:10 pm

surprised sk didnt just end it with "this title is bad"

SleepyKrew · Post Post #2519 (ISO) » Fri May 20, 2016 2:15 pm

why make it about subjective taste that people disagree with when I can make it about a rule

Ranger · Post Post #2520 (ISO) » Fri May 20, 2016 2:39 pm

For what it's worth: I was not influenced by shotty when I made my nth, and disagree with the call that he steered the title. It was Persivul's idea, and as someone who was there to see the game in question happen, I happen to agree with his nomination.

ConManMick · Post Post #2521 (ISO) » Fri May 20, 2016 2:56 pm

In post 2485, Kublai Khan wrote:Sample size = 1 game?

Who the hell gets a title based on what happened in one game? What's next... username puns at the same time?

That dude who I forget who it is but their title is "His Majesty" or something similar from a game that I think BBMolla ran, kingmaker. P sure you were in that actually.

PEDIT yeah that took me a second, my bad, I'm stupid.

Clumsy · Post Post #2522 (ISO) » Fri May 20, 2016 3:01 pm

In post 2520, Ranger wrote:For what it's worth: I was not influenced by shotty when I made my nth, and disagree with the call that he steered the title. It was Persivul's idea, and as someone who was there to see the game in question happen, I happen to agree with his nomination.

Same, if I hadn't forgotten about this thread, I might have nominated it myself. I was also in the game, found it hilarious.

In post 2495, hiplop wrote:
nominate clumsy for Treehouse Horror Story or something along those lines for spamming discussions of a treehouse with me to make me think he was town in Buzzfeed Upick

LOL. That was so fun. <3 you Hippy

Elbirn · Post Post #2523 (ISO) » Fri May 20, 2016 3:04 pm

In post 2512, SleepyKrew wrote:
In post 0, SleepyKrew wrote:Users are allowed to participate in discussions about their own potential titles, but they will preferably take a back-seat role. Do not try to steer the discussion on your own title.
Have I ever had to enforce this one before? I don't remember having to. Well, I am now.
BUSSED SO HARD
is dead.

I've cleaned out the multiposts as well.

Thank you

Aristophanes · Post Post #2524 (ISO) » Fri May 20, 2016 4:46 pm

So sorry about the multiposts!
Also, regardless of Shotty's input, I think it was a good Nom. And I feel like you know it..

Also, the rule is worded subjectively, which makes it a shitty rule.
I argue that your ruling be overturned, as it is arguable that he did not steer discussion, and that the rule be changed to say that "a user may not engage in discussion about their own nominations on potential titles."
This way it is explicit in the future, yet follows the current rules.

I, too, would

Nth this nom