Page 102 of 104

Posted: Fri May 20, 2016 4:57 pm
by SleepyKrew
In post 2524, Aristophanes wrote:the rule is worded subjectively, which makes it a shitty rule.
welcome to the title fairy thread
hell, welcome to mafiascum

I've already made my decision. shotty is appealing to a higher power. There's nothing left to discuss about it in the thread.

Posted: Fri May 20, 2016 5:00 pm
by Alexcellent
In post 2463, Persivul wrote:I nominate drmyshottyizsick for "BUSSED SO HARD!" for this game:
http://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.php?f=51&t=65884
in which he was bussed hard on D1 and that became his mantra in the aftergame.
Also support this. He really was bussed so hard!

Posted: Fri May 20, 2016 5:06 pm
by Aristophanes
In post 2525, SleepyKrew wrote:
In post 2524, Aristophanes wrote:the rule is worded subjectively, which makes it a shitty rule.
welcome to the title fairy thread
hell, welcome to mafiascum

I've already made my decision. shotty is appealing to a higher power. There's nothing left to discuss about it in the thread.
Okie dokes, I shan't push it.

My point about the rule wording stands though, if you would consider it.

Posted: Fri May 20, 2016 5:10 pm
by drmyshottyizsik
wrote:
In post 2525, SleepyKrew wrote:
In post 2524, Aristophanes wrote:the rule is worded subjectively, which makes it a shitty rule.
welcome to the title fairy thread
hell, welcome to mafiascum

I've already made my decision. shotty is appealing to a higher power. There's nothing left to discuss about it in the thread.[/quote ]
No I'm appealing to you. Just swallow your pride. We will all appreciate it.

Posted: Fri May 20, 2016 5:18 pm
by SleepyKrew
In post 2528, drmyshottyizsik wrote:No I'm appealing to you.
oh lol. Appeal denied.

This is going to be my last post on the topic.
Any further posts about it will be treated as spam.
Being the first person to respond to a nomination for yourself and then making sure approximately every other post in the thread is letting people know how you were BUSSED SO HARD is steering the discussion. The wording of the rule is fine, and shotty violated the wording as it is.

Feel free to PM me, but don't expect much more than "I've made my decision and nothing you've said has convinced me to change it" for a response.

Posted: Fri May 20, 2016 5:28 pm
by StrungOver
here since you're banning ban my ult

Posted: Fri May 20, 2016 5:44 pm
by Aristophanes
Hey SK,
Not intending this as spam, as I have dropped the Shotty discussion, other than to reflect my case points.
I would love to discuss this rule, as I do believe it brings about potentially unfair/biased results. Rules should be plainly stated, not up to interpretation, else issues like this occur.

Perhaps, in this instance, you are correct, as you seemingly have a solid case for this rejection. But you should not need to present a case as the mod. When a rule is quoted, it should be irrefutable. That was not what occurred in this instance.

Ban/block me from posting if you like, and delete this as spam if you so desire, but I honestly do feel the rule requires reformatting and that it is for the better of the thread if it happens.

That is the last I'll say here, but I would love to discuss it in PMs with you, if you are open to it.

Posted: Fri May 20, 2016 6:08 pm
by SleepyKrew
Discussing the rule in general instead of how it pertains to shotty's case is fine. I think the rule is pretty clear. The "case" I made to prove that shotty violated it was just a description of his posts. Just because some shitters needed me to spell out why he clearly violated the rule doesn't mean the rule's wording is an issue. It means shitters are dumb and shitty.

Anyway, this doesn't really matter anymore. I'm resigning! I'll announce my successor after they get the administration's blessing.

Posted: Fri May 20, 2016 7:28 pm
by esuriospiritus
spoilers: it's me

I'm changing all of your titles back to Mafia Scum

Posted: Fri May 20, 2016 7:33 pm
by xofelf
But but, I worked so hard for this one :(

Posted: Fri May 20, 2016 7:41 pm
by wgeurts
If we're being tricky with rules I don't see one stating we cannot try a new attempt:
I newly nominate shotty for "BUSSED SO HARD!"

Because I like the idea of the title and due to the fact he has been bussed a lot, especially in particular games. Now this time round shotty stay quiet.

Posted: Fri May 20, 2016 7:49 pm
by N
jfc no means no

Posted: Fri May 20, 2016 7:53 pm
by wgeurts
Could always lowercase it and make it a technically a new title :)

The way that rules work for this are completely off. Almost 10 people are able to support a title and because one person doesn't like it gets denied. Not even by just stating they don't like it. If his reasons are as he says then there's nothing wrong with my actions what so ever.

Posted: Fri May 20, 2016 8:00 pm
by dramonic
This nom is fucking garbage.

Posted: Fri May 20, 2016 8:04 pm
by SleepyKrew
In post 2536, N wrote:jfc no means no
I'm gonna be extra capricious with my bans while I still have power

Posted: Fri May 20, 2016 8:35 pm
by Killthestory
tempted to nom ranger for a title on how much he pisses me off, talking about finished games here

Posted: Fri May 20, 2016 10:01 pm
by Faraday
In post 2538, dramonic wrote:This nom is fucking garbage.
^

Posted: Fri May 20, 2016 10:22 pm
by Thestatusquo
you should make tbm the new title fairy.

Posted: Sat May 21, 2016 12:28 am
by Cheetory6
nominate wgeurts for shotdisturber

;)

Posted: Sat May 21, 2016 4:22 am
by SleepyKrew
The next Title Fairy will be Chevre! Thank you for agreeing to take over, and good luck.

It'll probably be a couple days before everything is set. Please bear with us.

Posted: Sat May 21, 2016 4:24 am
by SleepyKrew
oh wow he's subtle pink already

Posted: Sat May 21, 2016 4:29 am
by Not_Mafia
Congrats Chevre

Posted: Sat May 21, 2016 4:40 am
by BipolarChemist
In post 2544, SleepyKrew wrote:Please bear with us.
hmm?

Posted: Sat May 21, 2016 4:48 am
by Cheetory6
You.

Posted: Sat May 21, 2016 4:55 am
by BipolarChemist
Me? No, you.