Dance of the Title Fairy: Accepting Applications

vonflare · Post Post #3375 (ISO) » Tue Oct 17, 2017 6:01 am

Not that kind

I mean the kind that SUCCs the fun out of everything

Papa Zito · Post Post #3376 (ISO) » Tue Oct 17, 2017 7:06 am

In post 3374, Davsto wrote:

I love it.

Firebringer · Post Post #3377 (ISO) » Tue Oct 17, 2017 7:48 am

In post 3368, Alisae wrote:Please stop

In post 3370, Alisae wrote:This is THE definition of campaigning for a title
It is annoying
The meme is bad and super forced and it can stop now

Grandson u got baited hard with spoiler tag and opened it.
You are effectively mad because of a rick roll. Get over it.
Vonflare is not being nearly as annoying as you claim.

In post 3372, animorpherv1 wrote:It's not a meme anymore though. It's campaigning for a title, which isn't allowed and should have got you, NM, Zito, and Firebringer banmed already.

You can ban us, but you can never kill the idea that is:

Doot

Papa Zito · Post Post #3378 (ISO) » Tue Oct 17, 2017 7:52 am

He said banmed tho

Gorkington · Post Post #3379 (ISO) » Tue Oct 17, 2017 7:58 am

i didnt realize campaigning for someone else's title could get you banned.

Papa Zito · Post Post #3380 (ISO) » Tue Oct 17, 2017 8:04 am

banmed

UC Voyager · Post Post #3381 (ISO) » Tue Oct 17, 2017 8:04 am

http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=doot

THIS DOESN"T BELONG HERE!!!!!!!!!!!!
doot is slang term for something inappropriate!!!
once Everyone acknowledges this, i want to edit the link out!

Papa Zito · Post Post #3382 (ISO) » Tue Oct 17, 2017 8:06 am

In post 3381, UC Voyager wrote: doot is slang term for something inappropriate!!!

Your mom has a smooth forehead.

UC Voyager · Post Post #3383 (ISO) » Tue Oct 17, 2017 8:07 am

In post 3382, Papa Zito wrote:
In post 3381, UC Voyager wrote: doot is slang term for something inappropriate!!!
Your mom has a smooth forehead.

..........why.....just why....

Firebringer · Post Post #3384 (ISO) » Tue Oct 17, 2017 8:20 am

In post 3380, Papa Zito wrote:
banmed

What even is a banmed

vonflare · Post Post #3385 (ISO) » Tue Oct 17, 2017 8:22 am

In post 3384, Firebringer wrote:
In post 3380, Papa Zito wrote:
banmed
What even is a banmed

It's when specifically Mattp bans you

Not_Mafia · Post Post #3386 (ISO) » Tue Oct 17, 2017 8:27 am

In post 3372, animorpherv1 wrote:It's not a meme anymore though. It's campaigning for a title, which isn't allowed and should have got you, NM, Zito, and Firebringer banmed already.

Someone hand me the andidoot for these poisonous words

Gorny · Post Post #3387 (ISO) » Tue Oct 17, 2017 9:23 am

In post 3383, UC Voyager wrote:
In post 3382, Papa Zito wrote:
In post 3381, UC Voyager wrote: doot is slang term for something inappropriate!!!
Your mom has a smooth forehead.

..........why.....just why....

And no honor

UC Voyager · Post Post #3388 (ISO) » Tue Oct 17, 2017 9:39 am

In post 3387, Gorny wrote:
In post 3383, UC Voyager wrote:
In post 3382, Papa Zito wrote:
In post 3381, UC Voyager wrote: doot is slang term for something inappropriate!!!
Your mom has a smooth forehead.

..........why.....just why....
And no honor

..........this is what i get for like....watching a tv show when im making a username, isn't it?

Ginngie · Post Post #3389 (ISO) » Tue Oct 17, 2017 9:41 am

it's moreso that you try to act edgy and then when someone does something actually edgy, you get cringy

Psyche · Post Post #3390 (ISO) » Tue Oct 17, 2017 10:07 am

ok, pause

Psyche · Post Post #3391 (ISO) » Wed Oct 18, 2017 10:50 am

Ok, so I'm changing up the rules on shitposting a little bit.

I'm just not going to welcome it. This isn't GD. Your posts in this thread should usually be on-topic - contributing to the process of finding and securing good titles for users on this site. Occasional, especially tasteful off-topic posts are fine. But if a pattern of shitposting becomes evident and annoying, you'll be warned, and after repeated offenses or some egregious offense, you'll be banned from the subforum, etc.

I just think all this turns people off from contributing to this thread, and is better done in some other thread anyway.

ISO · Post Post #3392 (ISO) » Wed Oct 18, 2017 10:52 am

Davsto · Post Post #3393 (ISO) » Wed Oct 18, 2017 10:55 am

vonflare · Post Post #3394 (ISO) » Wed Oct 18, 2017 11:01 am

both of the above posts authored by tsq and davsto are extremely accurate and are vonflare-approved

also tsq plz unignore me in sitechat i like u now

Chevre · Post Post #3395 (ISO) » Wed Oct 18, 2017 11:03 am

maybe tsq still doesn't like u?

vonflare · Post Post #3396 (ISO) » Wed Oct 18, 2017 11:04 am

that's irrellevant

Fluminator · Post Post #3397 (ISO) » Wed Oct 18, 2017 11:07 am

You guys are really blatantly disrespecting the topic owner's wishes. It's kind of poor taste imo.

Virtuoso · Post Post #3398 (ISO) » Wed Oct 18, 2017 11:12 am

In post 3397, Fluminator wrote:You guys are really blatantly disrespecting the topic owner's wishes. It's kind of poor taste imo.

Agree 100%. If you can’t follow a simple request, GTFO

vonflare · Post Post #3399 (ISO) » Wed Oct 18, 2017 11:12 am

ok someone suggest a title