Mafiascum.net

Zor is right

I don't care about your personal take on literary criticism or how it applies here. Either you separate in game actions and this is a game worth playing or you can't and it's not.

In post 470, BROseidon wrote:(in b4 "but Penny was mean to Tracy" while ignoring the entire context within which that existed)

I don't think you can defend implying someone is an actual sociopath with "I was trying to make a point"

Skelda didn't tell you you were going home. You disgracefully swore to blacklist her forever and willfully and maliciously began a campaign to "make her feel terrible". Fuck that.

Oh do I need to use more capital letters? Is this too passive aggressive?

Pedit ninjad but I was responding to BRO's assertion that context made it OK.

In post 477, CuddlyCaucasian wrote:

In post 470, BROseidon wrote:(in b4 "but Penny was mean to Tracy" while ignoring the entire context within which that existed)

I don't think you can defend implying someone is an actual sociopath with "I was trying to make a point"

I wasn't "trying to make a point."

I was being a dick to someone who had been a dick to me. It's really, really fucking simple.

No I understand you

EDIT: Vijarada's post pretty much says it all, it's a total double standard

Personally I'd probably remove any player that leaned on out of game threats to influence in game behavior if I were the mod and knew it was going on.

Man oh man CC your moral authority here is amazing.

Like it's pretty telling that you're more worked up about all this than Skelda ever was.

It was in confessional. If he said that as a juror, that would have definitely been a modkill IMO.

PiggyGal15 told me in DBZ that she would blacklist me if it turned out I was lying about being a newbie

In post 483, BROseidon wrote:Like it's pretty telling that you're more worked up about all this than Skelda ever was.

Idk about CC but I would have let it go if your post game posting wasn't hypocritical, self righteous garbage.

Disclaimer I reserve the right to regret this post.

In post 462, zoraster wrote:How about even little shit like someone telling you they can't make a challenge (and thus earn your ire if they mess up) because their mom died?

The Johnny Fairplay Gambit is a legitimate Survivor Move.

In [url=https://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.php?post=8974435#p8974435]post 485[/url], CuddlyCaucasian wrote:PiggyGal15 told me in DBZ that she would blacklist me if it turned out I was lying about being a newbie

Well that's crap. STAN *shakes fist*

In post 487, Haschel Cedricson wrote:

In post 462, zoraster wrote:How about even little shit like someone telling you they can't make a challenge (and thus earn your ire if they mess up) because their mom died?

The Johnny Fairplay Gambit is a legitimate Survivor Move.

Sure! This is my point. But the only way it's legitimate is if there aren't out of game consequences for telling anyone else about it if you want if someone tries to use it.

In post 486, Vijarada wrote:

In post 483, BROseidon wrote:Like it's pretty telling that you're more worked up about all this than Skelda ever was.

Idk about CC but I would have let it go if your post game posting wasn't hypocritical, self righteous garbage.

Disclaimer I reserve the right to regret this post.

lol

Maybe if people hadn't constantly shitted on Juno and anyone who DARED VOTE FOR JUNO TO WIN I wouldn't have to post this shit.

Maybe if people could accept that emotion and personal connection exist within Survivor and that's okay I wouldn't have to post this shit.

etc etc

Like you're free to do w/e you want.

Other people are allowed to call you an asshole for it.

This shouldn't be that hard.

I agree with you zor, I mean my entire thing in DBZ was "opening up" to people about how my dad left me and my mom, and I was trying to get on Broadway to impress him or whatever. Also yeah I didn't think about that PiggyGal comment until now but I probably should have said something to the game mods at the time, idk if that's something that's okay

Nobodys arguing for OOG consequences zor, but I totally agree with you.

I defended Juno's emotions and game and voters several times, BRO.

In post 491, BROseidon wrote:Like you're free to do w/e you want.

Other people are allowed to call you an asshole for it.

This shouldn't be that hard.

Call me an asshole in game, sure. Call me one out of game? That's pretty shitty of you.

In post 494, Vijarada wrote:I defended Juno's emotions and game and voters several times, BRO.

Other than you coming for me for bizarre-seeming reasons, I don't have a problem with you, here.

In post 495, zoraster wrote:

In post 491, BROseidon wrote:Like you're free to do w/e you want.

Other people are allowed to call you an asshole for it.

This shouldn't be that hard.

Call me an asshole in game, sure. Call me one out of game? That's pretty shitty of you.

Again, how much do you believe in death of the artist?

Zoraster is right on the money

I think the whole issue here is how attacking the merits of someone's game isn't equivalent to attacking someone's character outside of the game