Page 4 of 4

Posted: Thu Feb 01, 2018 2:28 pm
by Xalxe
Yes.

Posted: Thu Feb 01, 2018 3:15 pm
by animorpherv1
In post 75, Xalxe wrote:Yes.
Slight edit; Yes, until they actually have to vote.

Posted: Thu Feb 01, 2018 5:05 pm
by xRECKONERx
In post 74, zoraster wrote:Do Jury members in most MS Survivor games get a chance to talk to each other about how they're going to vote?
Yes, up until finale starts. Then most mods tend to make them ask questions publicly then vote without having private convos.

Posted: Thu Feb 01, 2018 7:02 pm
by Skelda
In post 72, CuddlyCaucasian wrote:
In post 37, Skelda wrote:The fact that the average winner in F3s only get 48% of the vote is terrible.
this is my main problem

do F3 with preferential ballots
That's actually best of both worlds. Why doesn't it happen?

Posted: Thu Feb 01, 2018 7:03 pm
by xRECKONERx
god dont say preferential ballot or we'll have drench coming in here screaming all over the thread

Posted: Thu Feb 01, 2018 7:28 pm
by Drench
a preferential ballot would ensure a more sincere group choice which is the exact opposite of reality television murder and lying simulation survivor, and that's all i've got to say on it

Posted: Thu Feb 01, 2018 7:33 pm
by Haschel Cedricson
what about approval voting

Posted: Thu Feb 01, 2018 7:51 pm
by Skelda
I don't think I'd want approval voting. A lot of people might just approve the top two choices making the winner the most generally liked candidate but few people's top choice which I also think isn't very representative. Or people would strategically approve only one even though they were truly okay with either. Plus it would be tie-tastic even moreso than F3s normally are.

Posted: Thu Feb 01, 2018 10:34 pm
by Cheery Dog
In post 78, Skelda wrote:
In post 72, CuddlyCaucasian wrote:
In post 37, Skelda wrote:The fact that the average winner in F3s only get 48% of the vote is terrible.
this is my main problem

do F3 with preferential ballots
That's actually best of both worlds. Why doesn't it happen?
I don't think F3 would have enough players to be worth a preferential ballot.

maybe the F4 FTC is needed afterall.

Posted: Fri Feb 02, 2018 2:36 am
by BROseidon
In post 82, Skelda wrote:I don't think I'd want approval voting. A lot of people might just approve the top two choices making the winner the most generally liked candidate but few people's top choice which I also think isn't very representative. Or people would strategically approve only one even though they were truly okay with either. Plus it would be tie-tastic even moreso than F3s normally are.
Ya Lulu would have beaten Shaco and that would have been not-k.

Posted: Fri Feb 02, 2018 5:25 am
by Fluminator
This is a good video that I almost entirely agree with. It talks about final 2 vs. final 3 (and what's now essentially become a game where you play to get to final 4)
Spoiler: HvHvH end spoilers

Posted: Fri Feb 02, 2018 5:37 am
by Shrek
final 19 with a jury of 8

Posted: Fri Feb 02, 2018 6:15 am
by hiplop
In post 74, zoraster wrote:Do Jury members in most MS Survivor games get a chance to talk to each other about how they're going to vote?
I would be 100p okay if that wasn't the case

Posted: Fri Feb 02, 2018 6:27 am
by Fluminator
I don't really care how interesting the final tribal council is, since generally it's pretty obvious who will win either way.
I think final 2 makes the game leading up to the FTC more interesting than Final 3.