Mafiascum.net

I think it's more important to explain your own point of view throughout the game and justify your decision-making from that perspective

Yea the jury usually doesn't have a good idea of what happened is important to note I think. They usually have a flawed idea of what went wrony

A jury rarely wants to hear technically how things were different from what they thought unless its huge, key features. Personally as a juror hearing how the minutiae differed from my perspective gives me the impression that you're fake, annoying, and full of yourself. Ive never thought, "this jury is super out of touch with what went down at its core". Maybe you're just dealing with dumb juries

In post 26, hiplop wrote:They usually have a flawed idea of what went wrony

Just this approach would at least lose my vote

Tru tho

Just post hot guys.

Just do the opposite of what I do.

Do you not post hot guys?

I don't believe in hot guys.

This is y u lost Nexus

In post 32, BROseidon wrote:Do you not post hot guys?

I do not

The game I won I took the person that I knew a lot of people would be unhappy with, and I also let them overexplain their game. The blue text also helped. I also had no idea what it was I was doing so there was also that. I've also gotten second and tied for first and lost a revote, so I wouldn't advise playing jury the way I have either unless you like winning or losing by a single vote.

If somebody tells you "If you vote me out at F4 I will never vote for you ever", take them seriously.

who did that

that was in magic kingdom rite

In post 37, Haschel Cedricson wrote:If somebody tells you "If you vote me out at F4 I will never vote for you ever", take them seriously.

same tbh. except i will usually be the person you are voting out.

In post 35, DeasVail wrote:

In post 32, BROseidon wrote:Do you not post hot guys?

I do not

ilu dv but where were the hot guys???

I posted Rick Astley!

"hot guys"