In post 14, Chevre wrote:So when this said "MMO," I was hoping for some like kreepy Real World / Road Rules MMORPG.
Same. :O
/still here
In post 14, Chevre wrote:So when this said "MMO," I was hoping for some like kreepy Real World / Road Rules MMORPG.
In post 494, Xalxe wrote:
Somebodyread my article.
In post 578, Blackberry wrote:
Although I do find it INCREDIBLY ironic thatCybele, Xalxe, Drench, and Chesswere the four that said "haha let's throw away BB's Excel Sheet" when if they hadn't gotten rid of that idea those 4 would have most likely been safe from any of those gauntlets.
In post 591, Blackberry wrote:In post 590, KageLord wrote:I'm thinking the prize for unison should have been something like getting it twice means both people are safe from gauntlet.
Making anyone safe is so unfair to the people sitting out lol XD.
In post 604, Blackberry wrote:Seriously, how many times do I need to repeat the point that you are failing to address?
No where in your post does it state that one most submit that they are abstaining. Abstaining is easily interpreted as not submiting anything.
In post 606, animorpherv1 wrote:In post 604, Blackberry wrote:Seriously, how many times do I need to repeat the point that you are failing to address?
No where in your post does it state that one most submit that they are abstaining. Abstaining is easily interpreted as not submiting anything.
The PM might as well have contained a True or False in it. You can't say that it's a guaranteed Abstain.
In post 795, Blackberry wrote:In post 790, KageLord wrote:Just so everyone knows, these are my answers. BB and dana, if you would agree with them, that would be super.
Question 1: Blue
Question 2: Immunity
Question 3: Diamonds
Question 4: Follower
Question 5: Stable Desktop Internet
Question 6: Never enter the Gauntlet at all
Question 7: 1970s
Question 8: chesskid
Question 9: Rain
Question 10: 1
This brings back bad memories of Liar Game and my attempt to have the underdogs win over me and two of the better players (Xalxe and someone). The result was that they didn't believe me (though I had absolutely no logical reason to lie) and we all ended up losing. >>
I don't understand. XD If you post all your answers everyone will just submit all your answers and we'll all tie.
In post 794, Blackberry wrote:In post 789, Blackberry wrote:Just for clarification, can you elaborate on how scoring works in terms ofhow the ranks will be determined at the end of these challenges?
In post 842, animorpherv1 wrote:Those bonus points will be tallied instead of how the past two matches went.Challenge 3: Last Votes
In post 847, animorpherv1 wrote:In post 846, animorpherv1 wrote:In post 845, KageLord wrote:In post 842, animorpherv1 wrote:Those bonus points will be tallied instead of how the past two matches went.Challenge 3: Last Votes
... So the last two matches mean nothing?
o_0 Um no. I don't think that's what I meant.
I mean that "Instead of points for placing, you get 1 bonus point for each correct answer"
In post 892, Blackberry wrote:Kage - the point of the challenge was you wanted your teammates to guess yours but not your opponents. Me and Dana did the clever thing and directly referenced one of the recent PMs that all of us got. -_-
In post 899, danakillsu wrote:Ummm....I don't understand. How do you know I'm facing you Blackberry? If you don't know that I'm facing you, didn't you just tell the other team how to beat you?