Political Coalitions game (Round 4)

Twistedspoon · Post Post #325 (ISO) » Thu Mar 03, 2011 11:16 am

I'm not grovelling

therefore I win since I had the most cash

TonyMontana · Post Post #326 (ISO) » Thu Mar 03, 2011 11:32 am

I think the object of the game was to get out first. Thus I win.

Xalxe · Post Post #327 (ISO) » Thu Mar 03, 2011 12:00 pm

I grovelled. All night long.

gandalf5166 · Post Post #328 (ISO) » Thu Mar 03, 2011 4:16 pm

TonyMontana wrote:I think the object of the game was to get out first. Thus I win.

BUT I WON TOO

Drench · Post Post #329 (ISO) » Thu Mar 03, 2011 4:38 pm

NO PLZ CONTINUE PLZ

SEX FOR ALL IF WE CONTINUE, COURTESY OF THE AUS SEX PARTY

Twistedspoon · Post Post #330 (ISO) » Fri Mar 04, 2011 7:40 am

START THE GAME HOPPSTER

Cogito Ergo Sum · Post Post #331 (ISO) » Fri Mar 04, 2011 8:36 am

I'm claiming victory if Hoppster fails to continue the game.

Hoppster · Post Post #332 (ISO) » Fri Mar 04, 2011 9:49 am

I'll let Xalxe call this.

Xalxe · Post Post #333 (ISO) » Fri Mar 04, 2011 10:51 am

Hoppster wrote:I'll let Xalxe call this.

What am I calling?

Is it a hooker?

(No, srsly, what?)

Hoppster · Post Post #334 (ISO) » Fri Mar 04, 2011 11:32 am

Xalxe wrote:
Hoppster wrote:I'll let Xalxe call this.
What am I calling?

Is it a hooker?

(No, srsly, what?)

Do we continue the game? (You stupid.)

Xalxe · Post Post #335 (ISO) » Fri Mar 04, 2011 11:35 am

I vote yes.

Twistedspoon · Post Post #336 (ISO) » Fri Mar 04, 2011 11:36 am

Hoppster wrote: Do we continue the game? (You stupid.)

why not?

Hoppster · Post Post #337 (ISO) » Fri Mar 04, 2011 11:38 am

Xalxe wrote:I vote yes.

Okay, you send mass PMs reminding people the game exists (

please

).

@ Twisted: Meh. Lack of responses to the last round was a bit disheartening.

Xalxe · Post Post #338 (ISO) » Fri Mar 04, 2011 11:39 am

Only if you unstrike that please.

Hoppster · Post Post #339 (ISO) » Fri Mar 04, 2011 11:46 am

Xalxe wrote:please

Happy?

yabbaguy · Post Post #340 (ISO) » Fri Mar 04, 2011 11:55 am

I was always interested, I just didn't send a "No Attempt" PM or something like that. Sorry.

Hoppster · Post Post #341 (ISO) » Fri Mar 04, 2011 11:58 am

yabbaguy wrote:I was always interested, I just didn't send a "No Attempt" PM or something like that. Sorry.

That's alright, it's just that it was 4 other people as well.

XALXE, YOU'D BETTER HAVE SENT OUT THOSE MASS PMs.

Xalxe · Post Post #342 (ISO) » Fri Mar 04, 2011 12:04 pm

NO YOU DIDN'T EDIT YOUR POST

Twistedspoon · Post Post #343 (ISO) » Fri Mar 04, 2011 12:05 pm

why doesn't hoppster just do it?

Xalxe · Post Post #344 (ISO) » Fri Mar 04, 2011 12:06 pm

Twistedspoon wrote:why doesn't hoppster just do it?

'cause he's lazy and doesn't care. At least he's not as much of a hypocrite as me, though. ;]

Hoppster · Post Post #345 (ISO) » Fri Mar 04, 2011 12:07 pm

Fine... <<

I'm not one for editing my own posts. (Especially as I quoted a 'please' which SURELY WAS GOOD ENOUGH.)

Mass PM to be out WITHIN 5 MINUTES (assuming I don't get distracted).

Xalxe · Post Post #346 (ISO) » Fri Mar 04, 2011 12:09 pm

Hoppster, legitimately, if you want me to help you out, don't edit my posts in a rude manner.

Twistedspoon · Post Post #347 (ISO) » Fri Mar 04, 2011 12:10 pm

Hoppster wrote: (assuming I don't get distracted).

and what could distract you at this late hour?

Xalxe · Post Post #348 (ISO) » Fri Mar 04, 2011 12:11 pm

Hoppster · Post Post #349 (ISO) » Fri Mar 04, 2011 12:12 pm

Xalxe wrote:Hoppster, legitimately, if you want me to help you out, don't edit my posts in a rude manner.

GAWDAMNIT I INCLUDED A WINK. IT'S THE UNIVERSAL SYMBOL OF A JOKE.

Expect several PMs from the players.

Also, no, not porn. Even if it was, the context implies that porn is only avaliable late at night, which is just plain wrong.