A RadiantCowbells 13-player Predesigned setup

schadd_ · Post Post #4 (isolation #1) » Mon Sep 24, 2018 8:22 pm

i didnt say its good but it's probably balanced

schadd_ · Post Post #8 (isolation #2) » Mon Sep 24, 2018 8:24 pm

you make a setup that you like

schadd_ · Post Post #9 (isolation #3) » Mon Sep 24, 2018 8:24 pm

be honest: do you like this setup? and i mean like,

like

like it

schadd_ · Post Post #14 (isolation #4) » Mon Sep 24, 2018 8:29 pm

i don't have an issue with the setup in 1 idk

i think the only thing that might potentially ever be a problem is that neighborizer maybe looks like a scum role since if it's town it's really strong if you hit cop and whatever otherwise and like in a setup that's otherwise bland and straightforward that might seem out of place

that represents like 1% of scenarios

schadd_ · Post Post #15 (isolation #5) » Mon Sep 24, 2018 8:29 pm

you made two more setups for me while i was figuring out that post

schadd_ · Post Post #17 (isolation #6) » Mon Sep 24, 2018 8:30 pm

to be honest i like the first one the best of these

schadd_ · Post Post #20 (isolation #7) » Mon Sep 24, 2018 8:32 pm

im picturing me the jarl sitting slightly amused on my throne as you the court jester spin up a bunch of mafia setups to entertain me

schadd_ · Post Post #21 (isolation #8) » Mon Sep 24, 2018 8:32 pm

first setup with pre-ordained neighbors?

btwn a goon and jailer maybe

schadd_ · Post Post #26 (isolation #9) » Mon Sep 24, 2018 8:36 pm

ooh i like that one

alternately setup 1 with a 2-shot neighborizer

schadd_ · Post Post #29 (isolation #10) » Mon Sep 24, 2018 8:37 pm

the court jester makes a dick symbol with his hands and the jarl nods

schadd_ · Post Post #30 (isolation #11) » Mon Sep 24, 2018 8:38 pm

full neighborizer is fine i would just push for it being multitasking but suddenly that feels too good even though its not

hi implo

schadd_ · Post Post #31 (isolation #12) » Mon Sep 24, 2018 8:38 pm

watchers are great

schadd_ · Post Post #32 (isolation #13) » Mon Sep 24, 2018 8:42 pm

setting aside the court jester analogy it was really funny to me for some reason when you were all like "i actually really fucking hate this one setup out of the three i made just now"

schadd_ · Post Post #34 (isolation #14) » Mon Sep 24, 2018 8:45 pm

woah!!

schadd_ · Post Post #35 (isolation #15) » Mon Sep 24, 2018 8:46 pm

what if backup watcher claims and town thinks they're an informed goon

schadd_ · Post Post #37 (isolation #16) » Mon Sep 24, 2018 8:49 pm

anyway /pass the watcher one i guess????

schadd_ · Post Post #43 (isolation #17) » Mon Nov 12, 2018 6:47 pm

In post 38, ChibiBear wrote:By the way, I want to use a really
weird
awesome flavour for this game, do you guys have any suggestions? Because I have an idea :lol:

its up to you! it's a norm of the normal queue however that it doesn't impose considerably on gameplay, e.g. roles should be flavorless, and usually people don't form a larger narrative from game events - something i'm seeing a lot lately is consistent pictures and stuff being put in vote counts

In post 40, ChibiBear wrote:Oh, right, so:
-Factional actions and other actions may not be performed by the same player simultaneously.

Doesn't really apply here but I thought I'd leave it in or town may be able to guess that there are no scum PR?

this isn't the current normal standard, there is a modifier called multitasking that allows multiple simultaneous actions. something like "players will not be able to enact multiple night actions unless they are multitasking" might be appropriate but that is already implicit because it is a normal setup. people won't read into it either way i think.

schadd_ · Post Post #53 (isolation #18) » Tue Dec 04, 2018 1:45 pm

i would make the watcher say "you saw no one visit profii" specifically since he might confuse that with no result

otherwise fine, as long as the ordering of the kills is random !