Scummies 2013 - Nomination Thread

saulres · Post Post #29 (isolation #0) » Mon Jan 14, 2013 6:51 pm

Awww.... Thanks guys!

saulres · Post Post #63 (isolation #1) » Wed Feb 06, 2013 10:29 am

2nd Agency Mafia

saulres · Post Post #69 (isolation #2) » Thu Feb 07, 2013 10:19 am

I enjoyed it because:

1) The flavor was great
2) The mysteries around who was scum, even from people on the same scumteam, continued until the very end of the game,
3) I got to work out ways of avoiding a QT infiltrator while still communicating,
4) The regular revealing of new scumteams to the point of speculating if there was actually any town in the game was an interesting switch,
5) The possibility of double agents added yet another level of complexity to the strategizing
6) More that I can't think of off the top of my head.

saulres · Post Post #354 (isolation #3) » Thu Jul 25, 2013 8:39 am

Third mastin2

.

saulres · Post Post #379 (isolation #4) » Fri Aug 09, 2013 4:39 am

2nd uctriton00

. I ISOed him several times just to read the story.

saulres · Post Post #459 (isolation #5) » Thu Aug 29, 2013 10:24 am

What's even better with Jake's action there is if you knew (as the mod (me) and the people in the dead thread did) that NSin's vote on the bottom of the prior page (http://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.ph ... start=1275, scroll to the bottom) was the first in the quickhammer. I had been waiting (as much as I could on V/LA) for the scum to do the quickhammer, saw NSin place the vote, said to myself "game over", then went to the next page and laughed my ass off.

So another nth to Jake.

saulres · Post Post #518 (isolation #6) » Sat Oct 05, 2013 6:02 pm

What does "play to your outs" mean?

saulres · Post Post #723 (isolation #7) » Tue Jan 07, 2014 4:41 pm

I seem to remember this same conversation happening last year.

Why yes, yes it did.

On [url=http://www.mafiascum.net/forum/viewtopic.php?p=4631194#p4631194]Jan. 10, 2013[/url], zoraster wrote:Guys, take this to the ideas thread please. http://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.php?f=7&t=21912

saulres · Post Post #732 (isolation #8) » Tue Jan 07, 2014 6:08 pm

In post 726, Jake from State Farm wrote:5 days into 2014 the game ended. It should be for 2013.

Actually, 6 days into 2014 a game ended. It should be for 2013.

Actually, 7 days into 2014 a game ended. It should be for 2013.

Actually, 8 days into 2014 a game ended. It should be for 2013.

Actually, 9 days into 2014 a game ended. It should be for 2013.

.
.
.

Actually, 364 days into 2014 a game ended. It should be for 2013.

All these are the same to me. Draw a line somewhere that's easy to remember and doesn't cause conflict.

Oh wait -- we've already got the former, and it won't possible be able to avoid the latter.

Can we stop now please? Someone lock the thread?