I mean yes scum-me would say the same thing as well, because I do it for both alignments.In post 39, NorwegianboyEE wrote:Actually no, Layla's excuse can easily be made by scum. So since Gamma so kindly started the wagon, i'll put some more "oomph" behind it.In post 33, NorwegianboyEE wrote:I guess it’s NAI then.
VOTE: Layla
?In post 52, Gamma Emerald wrote:The problem is your explanation explains nothing regarding the reason you were poked about it. How does deciding your RVS pre-game affect your given logic?
Bad vote.In post 35, splitfarvle wrote:I think it’s strange to appear to be getting out of rvs but not voting, and giving up so easily on it.
VOTE: NorwegianboyEE
i cant tell if this is a jokeIn post 45, Zote the Mighty wrote:Fool! Must you wait until others cast their vote on someone you find scummy before you cast your vote on them yourself?In post 39, NorwegianboyEE wrote:Actually no, Layla's excuse can easily be made by scum. So since Gamma so kindly started the wagon, i'll put some more "oomph" behind it.In post 33, NorwegianboyEE wrote:I guess it’s NAI then.
VOTE: Layla
Precept Sixteen: Don't Hesitate. Once youve made a decision, carry it out and dont look back. You'll achieve much more this way.
VOTE: Norwegian
Even if you do that, there’s the chance you may change it. And having to explain away an exclusion like that looks scummy.In post 54, Layla wrote:?In post 52, Gamma Emerald wrote:The problem is your explanation explains nothing regarding the reason you were poked about it. How does deciding your RVS pre-game affect your given logic?
Someone said my RVS post had too much explanation and only scum do that.
I said I craft my RVS post before alignment was given. (Well not 100% copypaste craft. I look at the playerlist and think of a reason to vote someone for RVS, or what to say in general.)
If this doesn't explain it, I don't know what will.
:shrug:In post 58, Gamma Emerald wrote:Even if you do that, there’s the chance you may change it. And having to explain away an exclusion like that looks scummy.
If you read it closely you'll find a hidden treasure of content!In post 57, Tea wrote:i cant tell if this is a joke
Are you calling your own wagon hop opportunistic? Because Layla hasn't changed votes before this.
I just wanted to voteIn post 63, davesaz wrote:FL was your Tea vote extended RVS? If not please confirm the reason (if any, I know your style lol).
I agree with you up until your conclusion.In post 62, davesaz wrote:Tea's 57 is casting shade on what look to me to be a couple of good leads.
Tea would be a good vote but I think the careful play by Norwegian is scummier.
VOTE: Norwegian
yesIn post 64, davesaz wrote:your own wagon hop
What careful play lol.In post 62, davesaz wrote:Tea's 57 is casting shade on what look to me to be a couple of good leads.
Tea would be a good vote but I think the careful play by Norwegian is scummier.
VOTE: Norwegian
This is a good point^In post 67, Luca Blight wrote:The whole'crafting an RVS vote before getting a role PM' thing seems weird to me, though. I could see this being a lie, because I can't imagine why anyone would make an RVS post before the game has even opened.
UNVOTE:
VOTE: Layla
So why does this matter?In post 63, davesaz wrote:FL was your Tea vote extended RVS? If not please confirm the reason (if any, I know your style lol).