Nero scum still is hindering on NSG scum for meIn post 3797, Auro wrote:I prefer Alch to Nero because I get the feeling Nero's *asking* for the lynch. Unless he's scum with NSG, in which case NSG is a good vote anyway
If he's scum, how will it resolve itself?In post 3798, Comical wrote:Just let Nero live another day for a result?
Like he’s one of the PR. Let that resolve itself
In post 3801, Auro wrote:What claims apart from the two gunsmiths can give false positives? Jailkeeper?
How so?In post 3802, Comical wrote:Nero scum still is hindering on NSG scum for me
are you once again assuming that i am making up a behavior that i have never done before?In post 3793, Auro wrote:I also have a problem with her wanting to vote in VTs at all, I don't know if PR claims should ever stop NSG from lynching scum.
i've gone over this before. i wouldn't call it a "towncase", though.NSG, can you towncase Alchemist? Or at least describe why he is townier than both Eddie and I, yes, as Eddie asks.
In post 3341, northsidegal wrote:honestly i don't actually think that alchemist's whole thing with oka being a gunsmith is scummy. he has some pretty bad lines ("Nobody's saying Oka's not Jailkeeper so I'll assume that's the case here.") but i can actually track his thought process about a scum gunsmith / jailkeeper pointing towards vigs and thus a scum jailkeeper protecting a partner. i'm not saying that i agree, but it feels like a pretty genuine and complex thought that seems unlikely to have been pulled from nothing by scum.
was there some change in the gamestate that caused alchemist to want to basically go in an entirely new direction – against oka, who people were starting to townread more? i don't think so. i feel like this post is fairly accurate:In post 3262, Alchemist21 wrote:It's not a scumclaim. I challenge you to explain why scum me would correctly guess that you're Jailkeeper and then push you for it instead of quietly passing on the info to my scumteam?In post 3260, OkaPoka wrote:alch you want to tell us why you scumclaimed
And unless I'm scum with RCE, why would I as scum shake up the status quo when he was on track to being lynched?
My view doesn't have to be that extreme to hold consistency, NSG.In post 3807, northsidegal wrote:are you once again assuming that i am making up a behavior that i have never done before?
it seems like your view of me is as someone who gets some lock scumread and then forces that person's death, not stopping in the face of claims. i would call that view inaccurate.
SCUMSLIP?In post 3816, PenguinPower wrote:lol i'm just gonna kill oka
perhaps i've been making a mistake this entire game by calling the people i'm willing to lynch "null". perhaps it would look a lot better and be easier to understand as well as more accurate to my real thoughts if i called all of them my scumreads.In post 3815, Auro wrote:My view doesn't have to be that extreme to hold consistency, NSG.In post 3807, northsidegal wrote:are you once again assuming that i am making up a behavior that i have never done before?
it seems like your view of me is as someone who gets some lock scumread and then forces that person's death, not stopping in the face of claims. i would call that view inaccurate.
I feel like you're going "eh, let's just lynch here" rather than really scumhunting there and acknowledging that you're only voting outside due to claims.
Perhaps I'm remembering wrong, but, eh.
The correct mechanical play is to leash Nero to give a result that is useful regardless of what it is, such as iDany.
Thanks for re-quoting. I don't see why that mechanical spec is too complex forIn post 3807, northsidegal wrote:i've gone over this before. i wouldn't call it a "towncase", though.
i dunno why we're pretending he's not just outed mafia but yeaIn post 3822, OkaPoka wrote:okay
lets just stack luna, pp, and nero onto one target if he's not going to be lynched
I would feel better about you, and then start asking you to describe your scum cases.In post 3819, northsidegal wrote:perhaps i've been making a mistake this entire game by calling the people i'm willing to lynch "null". perhaps it would look a lot better and be easier to understand as well as more accurate to my real thoughts if i called all of them my scumreads.
if, instead, you considered that grouping to be my "scumreads", would that eliminate that feeling?
