Mini Normal 2148 (Day 5)

Normal Games (With basic roles and standard mechanics) Signups Here
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
 
User avatar
Joined: September 21, 2002
Location: Richmond, VA
Pronoun: He

Post Post #2300  (ISO)  » Fri Jul 31, 2020 8:05 am

In post 2298, DoctorPepper wrote:Bus?

So you agree that NPOM is scum?
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).

Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
 
User avatar
Joined: September 21, 2002
Location: Richmond, VA
Pronoun: He

Post Post #2301  (ISO)  » Fri Jul 31, 2020 8:15 am

I've got to say, this is obviously down to NPOM v DP for me, and I'm really wanting to vote DP.

Of the PRs, I think it's bob.
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).

Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
 
User avatar
Joined: September 21, 2002
Location: Richmond, VA
Pronoun: He

Post Post #2302  (ISO)  » Fri Jul 31, 2020 8:16 am

NM & max, yea or nay?
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).

Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
 
User avatar
Joined: September 21, 2002
Location: Richmond, VA
Pronoun: He

Post Post #2303  (ISO)  » Fri Jul 31, 2020 8:16 am

bob where are you and what are you thinking?
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).

DoctorPepper
Coca-Cola
 
User avatar
Joined: March 07, 2013
Location: In an office chair "working"
Pronoun: He

Post Post #2304  (ISO)  » Fri Jul 31, 2020 8:25 am

In post 2300, Green Crayons wrote:
In post 2298, DoctorPepper wrote:Bus?

So you agree that NPOM is scum?


Yes
Show

DoctorPepper
Coca-Cola
 
User avatar
Joined: March 07, 2013
Location: In an office chair "working"
Pronoun: He

Post Post #2305  (ISO)  » Fri Jul 31, 2020 8:25 am

In post 2299, maxwell wrote:UNVOTE:

What an absolutely bizarre thing to say.


...

Seriously
Show

Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
 
User avatar
Joined: September 21, 2002
Location: Richmond, VA
Pronoun: He

Post Post #2306  (ISO)  » Fri Jul 31, 2020 9:39 am

Is your max suspicions solely because of his claim?
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).

Not_Mafia
Smash Hit
 
User avatar
Joined: February 05, 2014
Location: Whitney's Gym
Pronoun: He

Post Post #2307  (ISO)  » Fri Jul 31, 2020 9:45 am

In post 2301, Green Crayons wrote:I've got to say, this is obviously down to NPOM v DP for me, and I'm really wanting to vote DP.

Of the PRs, I think it's bob.


I’m think NPOM+DP/bob

Leaning DP
Not mafia has impressively cheated on his very first clue.

I can't remember the last N_M post that wasn't bland, unimaginative and lame. Some shitposters are at least somewhat funny. You are the epitomy of the type of poster that nobody would miss if you were to suddenly disappear. You never add anything of value.

DoctorPepper
Coca-Cola
 
User avatar
Joined: March 07, 2013
Location: In an office chair "working"
Pronoun: He

Post Post #2308  (ISO)  » Fri Jul 31, 2020 10:36 am

In post 2306, Green Crayons wrote:Is your max suspicions solely because of his claim?


His claim today and because I disliked him yesterday.

He's gonna try to paint it as "he finds me scummy" but yesterday i have been clear that I think Maxwell is disingenuous
Show

Micc
Jack of All Trades
 
User avatar
Joined: October 01, 2013
Location: At Home
Pronoun: He

Post Post #2309  (ISO)  » Fri Jul 31, 2020 5:15 pm

Votecount 4.04NoPowerOverMe (1) - Not_Mafia
DoctorPepper (1) - NoPowerOverMe

Not Voting (4) - bob3141, DoctorPepper, Green Crayons, Maxwell

With 6 players alive it takes 4 votes to eliminate.

The deadline for Day 4 is in (expired on 2020-08-02 18:45:00).
"To hide a tree, use a forest" -Ninja Boy Hideo

maxwell
Goon
 
User avatar
Joined: August 22, 2011

Post Post #2310  (ISO)  » Fri Jul 31, 2020 6:48 pm

Bob being this quiet this far into the day is concerning. I'm tempted to just let the deadline pass and tell you guys to figure it out, though.

Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
 
User avatar
Joined: September 21, 2002
Location: Richmond, VA
Pronoun: He

Post Post #2311  (ISO)  » Fri Jul 31, 2020 9:52 pm

But I'm p sure you're town so let's not do that.
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).

NoPowerOverMe
Goon
 
User avatar
Joined: May 09, 2020
Pronoun: He

Post Post #2312  (ISO)  » Fri Jul 31, 2020 11:00 pm

What are the chances that any one of the PR's are lying? 40-50%

bob3141
Mafia Scum
 
User avatar
Joined: April 15, 2019
Pronoun: He

Post Post #2313  (ISO)  » Sat Aug 01, 2020 4:55 am

been busy at work will catch up when i can latter today

NoPowerOverMe
Goon
 
User avatar
Joined: May 09, 2020
Pronoun: He

Post Post #2314  (ISO)  » Sat Aug 01, 2020 5:13 am

Yep Bob and Dr are the one's acting most anti town. Bob has no sense of urgency and Dr is trying to discredit everyone.

NoPowerOverMe
Goon
 
User avatar
Joined: May 09, 2020
Pronoun: He

Post Post #2315  (ISO)  » Sat Aug 01, 2020 5:45 am

GC isn't acting anti town but I would still pick him due to POE.

DoctorPepper
Coca-Cola
 
User avatar
Joined: March 07, 2013
Location: In an office chair "working"
Pronoun: He

Post Post #2316  (ISO)  » Sat Aug 01, 2020 7:49 am

In post 2314, NoPowerOverMe wrote:Yep Bob and Dr are the one's acting most anti town. Bob has no sense of urgency and Dr is trying to discredit everyone.

...

How am I "trying to discredit everyone" when I've clearly been open to working with NM and GC.
Show

Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
 
User avatar
Joined: September 21, 2002
Location: Richmond, VA
Pronoun: He

Post Post #2317  (ISO)  » Sat Aug 01, 2020 8:16 am

In post 2315, NoPowerOverMe wrote:GC isn't acting anti town but I would still pick him due to POE.

That would mean you have slotted everyone else as town.
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).

Not_Mafia
Smash Hit
 
User avatar
Joined: February 05, 2014
Location: Whitney's Gym
Pronoun: He

Post Post #2318  (ISO)  » Sat Aug 01, 2020 8:26 am

Can we please just lynch NPOM, we have 35 hours
Not mafia has impressively cheated on his very first clue.

I can't remember the last N_M post that wasn't bland, unimaginative and lame. Some shitposters are at least somewhat funny. You are the epitomy of the type of poster that nobody would miss if you were to suddenly disappear. You never add anything of value.

Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
 
User avatar
Joined: September 21, 2002
Location: Richmond, VA
Pronoun: He

Post Post #2319  (ISO)  » Sat Aug 01, 2020 8:40 am

Max, you good with that?
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).

maxwell
Goon
 
User avatar
Joined: August 22, 2011

Post Post #2320  (ISO)  » Sat Aug 01, 2020 10:50 am

I guess. There's been enough inexplicable resistance there.

Not_Mafia
Smash Hit
 
User avatar
Joined: February 05, 2014
Location: Whitney's Gym
Pronoun: He

Post Post #2321  (ISO)  » Sat Aug 01, 2020 10:56 am

Please don't be Max and GC
Not mafia has impressively cheated on his very first clue.

I can't remember the last N_M post that wasn't bland, unimaginative and lame. Some shitposters are at least somewhat funny. You are the epitomy of the type of poster that nobody would miss if you were to suddenly disappear. You never add anything of value.

maxwell
Goon
 
User avatar
Joined: August 22, 2011

Post Post #2322  (ISO)  » Sat Aug 01, 2020 1:21 pm

It really can't be me. Although I thought about it and I want to vote doctorpepper now.

bob3141
Mafia Scum
 
User avatar
Joined: April 15, 2019
Pronoun: He

Post Post #2323  (ISO)  » Sat Aug 01, 2020 1:54 pm

In post 2322, maxwell wrote:It really can't be me. Although I thought about it and I want to vote doctorpepper now.


Ive been leaning that way too. I just dont get why he would just keep pushing a slot that is defacto confirmed town by mod mistake. It maybe due to a mod error but i cant see the mod not stating that the role had no bearing on the game if it wasnt in game. Rather than his mistake being him flipping the wrong town role. Certainly is bizarre that doctorpepper would choose to push the one slot that is on par with a mason post mason flip. As maxwell apart from myself is the one player I'm most sure is town.

So i dont get why he would continue to push your slot by responding to your vote on powers by calling it a bus.

bob3141
Mafia Scum
 
User avatar
Joined: April 15, 2019
Pronoun: He

Post Post #2324  (ISO)  » Sat Aug 01, 2020 2:03 pm

Its just as much him continuing to push a slot that's near highly likely to flip town. If the mod had flipped the wrong role as well as it being one that didn't exist. I can't see the mod either saying the role simple doc did not exist or something more drastic.

He keeps coming back with claims he suspect maxwell yesterday before the full role claim. But that migth be so but doesnt change the underlying fact of maxwells claim. Ive seen fellow town push mason while scum back off but never after one of the masons flipped. And the mod mistake for all intensive purposes made maxwel an IC.

PreviousNext
[ + ]

Return to New York