My current thoughts:
Kairal pushing his VCA, even after being told it's probably non-indicative, I can't decide what that is.
In post 1600, Kairal wrote:
Secondly as suspicious as everything you've done this last few pages is the fact is that the VCA implicates flubber more strongly than it implicates you.
In post 1640, Kairal wrote:
Ok the two things I'm getting from my VCA are one of Naomi and Flubber must be scum.
The VCA doesn't indicate anything of the sort. In fact, a good scum team would make sure that all of their players are in rotation on wagons, to ensure exactly this sort of thing doesn't happen. And it STILL doesn't work around the fact that, if we even begin to trust that this VCA is exposing some sort of scummy behavior, that the rest of us would have to review it and deduce that Kairal himself is the one most likely to be scum, based on Kairal's own parameters.
So why continue to push Flubber here based solely on the VCA, and why push AJ based solely on his perceived defense of Flubber?
And maybe more importantly, why not push Naomi, who is supposedly equally as scummy due to the VCA as Flubber?
I'll unvote but somebody needs to explain this. We have 1 day 5 hours 25 minutes as of this post, if the votecount from Sunday is to be believed.unvote
"1AM .. not a good time to think I started mixing massive and mathcam" - Totem, DP8
"unvote mlaker; vote massive; It's like MeMe/mneme and Corsato/Cadmium" - Dragon Phoenix, Newbie 38
PLEASE NOTE: I actively avoid being online on weekends! Don't replace me just because of this!