Mini 1875: Pine's Death Trap Post Game - Town win!

[Fro99er]

motherfucker

VOTE: TB

I need sleep

[Fro99er]

I think Nancy is right.

MBG+TB

[Keyser Söze]

Did Akarin bus/out her team on D2 then?:
(I.e scum theatre tunnel gone wrong)
I read it in Akarin's favour when I first read it.

Spoiler:

What if it's a

Jar Jar, Matt

, Frogger scumteam?

Been re-reading your D2 ISO.

If mattblackguy is scum, this is the moment where Akarin absolutely sewed up the JarJarDrinks-mattblackguy scum connection:

It doesn't really make sense that his first reaction to Gerrys flip is that RC was reaction testing. Like shouldn't he have considered that RC was scum that got caught fakeclaiming? Especially considering that he soon starting pushing RC-scum soon after.

RC scum still makes more sense. But Town RC/Town Matt makes no sense.

What does this even mean? You're scumreading RC, but if RC is town, Matt is definitely scum, even though you're townreading Matt? And you have a problem with Transcend suspecting scum Matt but town RC, but your argument here is basically an argument for scum Matt, town RC?

Why should Town RC imply scum Matt?

Question JJD: if you can conceive of either of our slots being town and the either scum, then why can't you conceive of both of our slots being town?

Like if either one of our interactions could have been TvS there's no reason why they couldn't have both been and the whole situation being TvT.

I mean I don't think it's impossible for you both to be town. I just think it's ridiculous that transcend can rule BOTH of you out as scum.

That's not the argument you made though.

So why is that a ridiculous read from Transcend?

The statement from Matt is scummy regardless. I've already said that the statement could come from scum matt even if RC is scum as well. But it makes way more sense for scum matt to make it about town RC.

And as I said later, It's not impossible for for them both to be town. My statement was directed @ trans and how terrible it was for him to be townreading the both of them.

Yeah, I can see why Matt's post is scummy, but that's not what I'm asking. You said later they could both be town. But exactly as you just said, you think it was terrible for Transcend to be townreading both of them. Which means you think that if RC is town, Matt should be more likely than average to be scum.

But nothing you've said explains that. Why do you think that?

Akarin

- slight scumlean. I feel like a lot of her questions directed @ me are designed to get me to scumread Matt and/or townread RC. Agree w/ her vif and rauth reads though.

I wasn't trying to get you to scumread Matt. I was pointing out that your reasoning doesn't make sense. You basically logic yourself into having a scumread on Matt, but then don't actually have one, and now are scumreading me for "trying to get you to have a scumread on Matt."

I'm pointing out that by your logic, you already

should

have a scumread on Matt, but you don't, you think Matt is town and RC is scum. And regardless of Matt, who honestly I'm not sure how I feel about,

that

is scummy.

It's not real logic, it's convenient reads and then logic made up to support them.

Akarin is already a t/lean, but if Matt flips red, Akarin just won the internet.

Even if Matt flips town, Akarin has still won town points for her logical argument versus JarJar.

Akarin: would not lynch today

.

[Keyser Söze]

I've been waiting 4 days and 2 hours for MGB to answer my two simple questions...

By refusing to answer them, I can only presume A) he's doesn't have a town WINCON or B) he's working against his town WINCON.

Either way, he's fucked now.

[Keyser Söze]

If Rauth is telling the truth then it narrows the game down a lot, and that means:
RC Town
Rauth Town
Grendel Town
Nancy Town
Akarin Town

Meaning the 3 scum are in:
LUV
Vifam
Keyser
JarJar
Sheep

Please can you explain to me why Rauth's roleclaim meant Grendel, Nancy and Akarin were town?

...and the 3 scum HAD to be in the bottom list of 5 players.

[Cooperative Sheep]

How does JJD being scum clear ThinkBig..?

For basically the same reasons that scum ThinkBig clears LUV in your mind - ThinkBig, when Akarian, attacked JarJar.
And if that's a bus, then why couldn't ThinkBig/LUV be a bus?

[Cooperative Sheep]

I think Nancy is right.

MBG+TB

Then vote MBG, more of us see that wagon, whilst some people actively townread TB.

[RadiantCowbells]

Don't vote anyone for now actually.

I want to do more work in the VTs regardless of who we lynch.

[Keyser Söze]

5 days.

[RadiantCowbells]

Tbh if MBG is scum the last scum is easily deducable

[nancy]

@Keyser yes.

@Sheep bussing at this point is suicide..

[RadiantCowbells]

why is it suicide

[RadiantCowbells]

LITERALLY NO1 IS DEFENDING MBG IF THEY ARE SCUM SOMEONE IS BUSSING

[nancy]

ThinkBig is defending him....

[RadiantCowbells]

where?

[nancy]

The posts where he tries to push Town onto LUV instead of mbg.

[Cooperative Sheep]

Also, functionally, Nancy and Frog are, by playing with a counter wagon.
I only have one of them as a scum read

[nancy]

Sheep I literally have no words.

[Pine]

Hello, players, I am sorry to have been a bit of an absentee mod the last few days. For the last 17 years, I have spent my summers (and a good chunk of the offseason) working at and volunteering for a non-profit summer camp. We also offer winter and spring break day camps, and winter camp was this week. As tiring as summer can can be, and as muddy as spring camp can be, winter camp is always the toughest. I've been coming home exhausted to the core every day, and was briefly sick in the middle of the week. Fortunately it was raining today, and playing board games all day is a lot less draining than sledding or capture the flag in the snow.

I'm back, and am working on a VC now.

[Cooperative Sheep]

Sheep I literally have no words.

You don't find potential hypocrisy in suggesting someone is scum for pushing off the MBG wagon and then trying to start a wagon on that player (which pushes off the MBG wagon) while all the evidence for your second case *requires* MBG to be scum?
Because I have issues with that - words or no.

[nancy]

Welcome back Pine.

Yes, Sheep, I am pushing a counterwagon off one member of my proposed scumteam onto another member. You got me.

[Pine]

==> Vote Count 3.7 <==

With 10 votes in play, it's 6 to lynch!

Thug Behra or Buhram (ca 1765–1840), also known as Buhram Jemedar and the 'King of the Thugs', was a leader of the Thuggee cult active in Oudh in northern central India during the late 18th and early 19th century, and is often cited as one of the world's most prolific serial killers. He may have been involved in up to 931 murders by strangulation between 1790–1840 performed with a ceremonial rumāl, a handkerchief-like cloth used by his cult as a garrote.

The Thuggee cult, from whence comes the English word 'thug,' wandered the Indian subcontinent for perhaps six hundred years, gaining the confidence of travelers and murdering them ritually. They believed themselves the children of Kali, the Hindu goddess of death. They believed their 'work' to be for the greater good, as Kali would destroy all mankind if not appeased. The Thuggee were believed to be eradicated by British colonial forces in the 1830s.

[L-6]

Grendel -

[L-4]

ThinkBig - nancy, Fro99er

[L-6]

Rautherdir -

[L-5]

Lil Uzi Vert - mattblackguy

[L-6]

nancy -

[L-6]

Cooperative Sheep -

[L-6]

Keyser Söze -

[L-6]

Fro99er -

[L-4]

mattblackguy - Lil Uzi Vert, Cooperative Sheep

[L-6]

RadiantCowbells -

[L-5]

No Lynch - Rautherdir

Waiting for their DOOM

- ThinkBig, Grendel, RadiantCowbells, Keyser Söze

Day 3 ends in (expired on 2017-03-01 19:45:00)

[nancy]

So does someone want to point out how I'm terrible and wrong about ThinkBig or are we just gonna keep sitting around here doing nothing until 8 hrs before deadline?

pedit hi Pine!

[Cooperative Sheep]

Welcome back Pine.

Yes, Sheep, I am pushing a counterwagon off one member of my proposed scumteam onto another member. You got me.

I'm not claiming hypocrisy in your theory scumteam, I'm claiming it in relation to your vote, and also attacking someone for doing something that you're also doing.

[nancy]

Explain? Who did I attack?