You do not need to quote to say what the phrasing is.In post 2248, RayFrost wrote:No. I am not allowed to use the exact phrasing, as that would be quoting mod communication.
And Kelvin's replacement.In post 2239, Priscila wrote:They are. I am waiting for MMM to claim, then I will claim.In post 2223, BigYoshiFan wrote:Now it's time to chill. If we wanna talk stupid, I thought the --> lists were for lynches and not claims.
This was posted by me. Ignore the name and avi.In post 2262, DeathByMudkip wrote:Fuck on my hydra still
Honestly don't get what you are trying to accomplish here....In post 2253, Priscila wrote:You could have just said "Yes, that's how it is phrased" or "No, it says that the person doesn't have a gun / guns". It is absurdly easy to just change the wording slightly to avoid breaking the rule. And if you had responded very quickly, that would look very villagery for you. So, regardless of your alignment, your reluctance did nothing to help.
Complaining over.
) and also opportunism is optimal as town so that's where I'm voting today
I feel left out.In post 2266, MarioManiac4 wrote:Warning: This post will be Setup Speculation™ because I'm bad at scumhunting.
uhhh ok so I could see this;
Vanilla Townie
Vanilla Townie
Vanilla Townie
Vanilla Townie
Vanilla Townie
Vanilla Townie
Town Miller Doublevoter
Town 2-Shot Gunsmith
Town Odd-Night Cop
Town Even-Night Doctor
scum
scum
Mafia 2-Shot Roleblocker
---
^ if you have a role that makes this setup false
you absolutely need to claim now
otherwise I'm calling {Kelvin, Ircher, RayFrost, PP} as all town so scum has to be between {Gamma, MMM, Priscila} with an outside chance of scumdoc PP or even scumtraitor i guess
but i read tarkus as hardtown because I understood his entire view of the game (priscila is largely null)
I'm leaning scum on MMM but it's clear nobody wants to wagon him
Gamma could well be scum (just from gut, I did say I was a bad mafia player- heed my warnings
Catharsis.In post 2265, Ircher wrote:Honestly don't get what you are trying to accomplish here....In post 2253, Priscila wrote:You could have just said "Yes, that's how it is phrased" or "No, it says that the person doesn't have a gun / guns". It is absurdly easy to just change the wording slightly to avoid breaking the rule. And if you had responded very quickly, that would look very villagery for you. So, regardless of your alignment, your reluctance did nothing to help.
Complaining over.
Why are you so sure there will be no more power?In post 2268, Gamma Emerald wrote:TBH I think we have the game on lock if no one disproves the current setup
How on earth am I largely null?In post 2266, MarioManiac4 wrote:but i read tarkus as hardtown because I understood his entire view of the game (priscila is largely null)
