well apparently it was an answer to my question so yeahIn post 521, davesaz wrote:Oh, 409 right? Yeah multiple people commented on that, I didn't see it as useful either but didn't think it would be helpful to "me too".In post 518, Theta Alpine wrote:oh
i did not consider that an answer considering that you did not explain why it does not come from scum
yeahIn post 529, Mulch wrote:What's with me and the Mason claims this game lol
?In post 532, Assemblerotws wrote:Mario counterclaimed when he realized Mulch was actually claiming that he and Nero were masons. There's probably scum somewhere in this interaction.
i meanIn post 534, Assemblerotws wrote: Maybe his original claim was a joke. Then again, maybe not.
I was talking about Mario.In post 535, Theta Alpine wrote:i meanIn post 534, Assemblerotws wrote: Maybe his original claim was a joke. Then again, maybe not.
it is even on this page
like seriously just read this page
I am definitely taking a closer look at Yumeko.In post 465, Excession wrote:Slow down guys, give a body time to read at least!
This must surely rank amongst the worst posts I've ever seen.
Despite the post explicitly stating that he has not read the thread you criticise it for not being based on things that could only be gleaned byIn post 117, Yumeko Jabami wrote:I don't like that you voted MarioManiac4 here - pressure was starting to build up between him and Mulch. I'd also lean more towards Mulch being scum at this point where you posted than Mario.In post 112, UnaBombaH wrote:Woo, I am here!
...and now I must go to sleep.
I'll read the thread in ~6hours.
VOTE: MarioManiac4 because last time I followed his lead, we lost the game because I played poorly.
No wait...!
Lastly, it looks like you are trying to coat your vote as completely random but it falls onto a forming wagon. It feels like you are trying to shirk responsibility for your vote by playing it off as random.
vote: UnaBombaH
reading the thread? (And also beause it does not share your opinion?)
Then you suggest that the vote it contains is trying to be random!? That writing there, next to the vote, looks like a reason to me, and a typically RVS reason too.
Then the completely pointless vote. Followed by an immediate switch to Mulch, parts of of your critiscism include (and this is the main thrust of your 107) reaching early conclusions based on a limited number of posts. Yet you are confident enough to drop a vote on UnaBomber after his first post? In the same post you even say...
This reads like it could be an early distancing post to me, especially with Mulch's comment on Cloud dropping out of that slot.Why do you feel like you can read their alignment off of one post? It seems like you are posturing around this read.
Theta alpine andIgnitionyoubothcommented on flip-flops being scummy but failed to comment on this post, why?
[sigh]Then follows the inevitable "lets lynch a lurker because they're scum" discussion...[/sigh]
Holy shit, can someone tell me if there was anything relevent in post 405, it was making me lose the will to live so I gave up reading it. True Story.
I've actually like UnaBomba's last few posts so put a hold on my earlier theory, Yojimbo is still scum though.
Apart from that I'm getting scum vibes from Dunker (look like dodge posts) and Mary.
Osuka can be town for now.
There are probably more interesting things in there but time is a finite resource.
VOTE: Yumeko Jabami
To this, ten posts and 1.5 hours later:In post 107, Yumeko Jabami wrote:What makes you comfortable saying this so early?In post 31, TwoInAMillion wrote:I'm pretty sure you and Mulch are town at this point, but I've been wrong before.In post 29, Nero Cain wrote:98% of the time scum will not shoot a claimed mason since a mason is not really a threat until LYLO and they can use the "this guy and this guy are scum" paranoia.In post 24, TwoInAMillion wrote:Why do you think claiming mason on day 1 is a smart pro town move?
And how did you reach this conclusion? Why are they town?
I do not feel like your reads hold much if any weight behind them at this point.
Why? I don't think he has done anything to earn a townread so soon. Do you think that this player is painfully obvious as mafia to the point where you could catch them within the first page of posting?
Why?
Can you explain what meta you used to heavily scumread a player within the first 2 pages? Why do you think this meta is reliable Why do you think you are able to 'catch' MarioManiac4 within the first few pages if scum?In post 50, Mulch wrote:Like I'm pretty heavily scum reading Mario right now on meta but since Nero I think is a better town player and I think mason co unity right now is important I'm not going to switch to Mario.
Do you trust your meta enough to confidently townread him?In post 54, TwoInAMillion wrote:Scum mulch is not this self aware this early on. He tries to play cool as scum.
It's only been 2 pages at this point. Why are you trying to apply meta?
What do you mean by fabricating reads? What would you expect him to have for reads as town at this point?In post 88, Mulch wrote:Yeah I'm not getting why they think ignition is town when my first gut reaction to them is scum. Makes it more likely Mario is just fabricating readsIn post 86, osuka wrote:Mario is confscum
How did you form these reads? Do you think the 2 posts each they have made are not fakeable as scum? Do you think it makes them more likely to be town - if so why?In post 83, MarioManiac4 wrote:MM4 games in a nutshell.
Ignition and Creature are my early townreads.
VOTE: Yumeko JabamiIn post 117, Yumeko Jabami wrote:I don't like that you voted MarioManiac4 here - pressure was starting to build up between him and Mulch. I'd also lean more towards Mulch being scum at this point where you posted than Mario.In post 112, UnaBombaH wrote:Woo, I am here!
...and now I must go to sleep.
I'll read the thread in ~6hours.
VOTE: MarioManiac4 because last time I followed his lead, we lost the game because I played poorly.
No wait...!
Lastly, it looks like you are trying to coat your vote as completely random but it falls onto a forming wagon. It feels like you are trying to shirk responsibility for your vote by playing it off as random.
VOTE: UnaBombaH
