Large Normal 211: Scientific Mafia

Nictis · Post Post #2225 (ISO) » Sun Apr 22, 2018 9:39 pm

Assuming that Pine is not the SK (Ascetic full Vig is a bit hard to believe, but I believe it) then the next most likely would be Mulch (Remember them taking cred for the vig kill? Possible both targeted Nos and he backed off when Pine stepped up) or Inferno. TIAM we know isn't Mafia, could be SK, but I doubt they'd have tried not killing to lie low. I'd recommend checking Mulch or Inferno (I think Inferno claimed Ascetic early on though)

Inferno390 · Post Post #2226 (ISO) » Mon Apr 23, 2018 5:48 am

The only things I have claimed are Town Neighbor and Flying Pumpkin That Shoots Laser Beams Out Of Its Ass.

Inferno390 · Post Post #2227 (ISO) » Mon Apr 23, 2018 5:55 am

Like, my question is, if there are 3 killing roles, why did we only get 2 kills N1? And by all of the logic playing out right now, why was there only 1 kill N2? Because if we're going on Egg died because text!scum, and Beef died to pine, where did the scum NK go, and what about the SK?

Gamma Emerald · Post Post #2228 (ISO) » Mon Apr 23, 2018 6:10 am

In post 2227, Inferno390 wrote:Like, my question is, if there are 3 killing roles, why did we only get 2 kills N1? And by all of the logic playing out right now, why was there only 1 kill N2? Because if we're going on Egg died because text!scum, and Beef died to pine, where did the scum NK go, and what about the SK?

And these are good questions.

ISO · Post Post #2229 (ISO) » Mon Apr 23, 2018 6:11 am

In post 2227, Inferno390 wrote:Like, my question is, if there are 3 killing roles, why did we only get 2 kills N1? And by all of the logic playing out right now, why was there only 1 kill N2? Because if we're going on Egg died because text!scum, and Beef died to pine, where did the scum NK go, and what about the SK?

because there are 2 killing roles.

TwoInAMillion · Post Post #2230 (ISO) » Mon Apr 23, 2018 6:51 am

In post 2227, Inferno390 wrote:Like, my question is, if there are 3 killing roles, why did we only get 2 kills N1? And by all of the logic playing out right now, why was there only 1 kill N2? Because if we're going on Egg died because text!scum, and Beef died to pine, where did the scum NK go, and what about the SK?

Because beef died from the scum and Pine is out of SK kills.

Gamma Emerald · Post Post #2231 (ISO) » Mon Apr 23, 2018 6:52 am

um what
sk doesn't have limited kills

ISO · Post Post #2232 (ISO) » Mon Apr 23, 2018 6:52 am

No, that's not how a SK works. We're reading way too much into this. The game may or may not end with RF's death; if it doesn't Pine is 99% a SK and the game ends then. Town has already won. It's literally that simple.

Pine · Post Post #2233 (ISO) » Mon Apr 23, 2018 6:53 am

Limited-shot SK is not really a thing.

Why in the fuck would scum kill Beef? Literally no one thought he was Town.

TwoInAMillion · Post Post #2234 (ISO) » Mon Apr 23, 2018 6:55 am

He was town though, and scum knows that. Scum do lots of things for WIFOM.

ISO · Post Post #2235 (ISO) » Mon Apr 23, 2018 6:56 am

In post 2234, TwoInAMillion wrote:He was town though, and scum knows that. Scum do lots of things for WIFOM.

what ...

ISO · Post Post #2236 (ISO) » Mon Apr 23, 2018 6:58 am

I mean if texcat and RF wanted to gamethrow good for them I guess but like I'm pretty sure they didn't. Beef was dying anyway according to the claimed vig not on their team, so that would also be a waste of a kill. This theory is just bad. Most likely scum tried to kill someone like Firebringer, and it failed due to a protective. Pretty sure I'll be proven right in a few days.

TwoInAMillion · Post Post #2237 (ISO) » Mon Apr 23, 2018 7:00 am

It's possible I just think it's more likely Pine is a SK based on game balance than Beef's death supposedly clearing Pine.

Gamma Emerald · Post Post #2238 (ISO) » Mon Apr 23, 2018 7:02 am

In post 2234, TwoInAMillion wrote:He was town though, and scum knows that. Scum do lots of things for WIFOM.

That is unbeneficial WIFOM imo. It serves no purpose but to be a wtf moment.

RedFlavor · Post Post #2239 (ISO) » Mon Apr 23, 2018 7:03 am

In post 2209, RedFlavor wrote:
In post 2201, RedFlavor wrote:4 mafia 1 traitor and 1 sk would make sense more than no sk with this town right?

ISO · Post Post #2240 (ISO) » Mon Apr 23, 2018 7:05 am

I suppose it's more likely Pine is a SK then not, but speculation is still pretty irrelevant at this point in time.

Gamma Emerald · Post Post #2241 (ISO) » Mon Apr 23, 2018 7:07 am

I actually have a thought, and if I'm right I feel confident that Pine is an SK

@MOD: If Egg were to target an ascetic scum, would they die? Would they die if they targeted an ascetic that got nightkilled?

Archwing · Post Post #2242 (ISO) » Mon Apr 23, 2018 8:44 am

Omg stop twilight talking

Pine · Post Post #2243 (ISO) » Mon Apr 23, 2018 8:45 am

In post 2242, Archwing wrote:Omg stop twilight talking

Inferno390 · Post Post #2244 (ISO) » Mon Apr 23, 2018 8:50 am

In post 2230, TwoInAMillion wrote:
In post 2227, Inferno390 wrote:Like, my question is, if there are 3 killing roles, why did we only get 2 kills N1? And by all of the logic playing out right now, why was there only 1 kill N2? Because if we're going on Egg died because text!scum, and Beef died to pine, where did the scum NK go, and what about the SK?

Because beef died from the scum and Pine is out of SK kills.

A) Stop this bullshit. Even if Pine was SK, that would mean he's a 1-shot Sk, which would literally be the shittiest role for a SK ever.
B) Even if we assume Pine is SK and not vig, leaving us with 2 power roles, he cliamed the kill on Beef at the beginning of the day. So not only is this incorrect, if we're assuing text!scum due to Egg's death, we're still missing the scumkill on N2. So your "explanation" doesn't even work.

Can we just policy lynch TIAM tommorow? Town is in a fine place as it is right now, he's in the handful of players that aren't confrimed scum, and this crap coming from this slot is just hurting us at this point.

Mulch · Post Post #2245 (ISO) » Mon Apr 23, 2018 9:03 am

I could use an inferno policy

Pine · Post Post #2246 (ISO) » Mon Apr 23, 2018 9:11 am

I could be convinced to policy vig both

Inferno390 · Post Post #2247 (ISO) » Mon Apr 23, 2018 10:02 am

Please explain policy on me.

Archwing · Post Post #2248 (ISO) » Mon Apr 23, 2018 11:44 am

In post 2243, Pine wrote:
In post 2242, Archwing wrote:Omg stop twilight talking

Mulch · Post Post #2249 (ISO) » Mon Apr 23, 2018 11:52 am

WE ARE ALLOWED TO TWILIGHT TALK

Someone please say happy cake day to me