Maybe it's just my biased point of view, but it sounded to me like he was bragging about getting the masons lynched. <Shrug>In post 1771, Gamma Emerald wrote:He never said wasn’t responsible in fact we went over this d2, you’re just twisting things at this pointIn post 1769, texcat wrote:This looks a lot like an admission of guilt in lynching the masons.In post 1768, Garmr wrote:Are you trying to argue that scum me did this on a slot i could of probably pushed to lynch at the time after I pushed to lynch masons day 1?In post 1767, Ruby Red wrote:are you trying to argue that people should be townreading a fake guilty
mini normal 2027: advice mafia (endgrame)
- texcat
-
texcat Mafia Scum
- texcat
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2728
- Joined: August 18, 2014
- Garmr
-
Garmr Survivor
- Garmr
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
That's the dumbest thing I ever heard.In post 1775, texcat wrote:
Maybe it's just my biased point of view, but it sounded to me like he was bragging about getting the masons lynched. <Shrug>In post 1771, Gamma Emerald wrote:
He never said wasn’t responsible in fact we went over this d2, you’re just twisting things at this pointIn post 1769, texcat wrote:
This looks a lot like an admission of guilt in lynching the masons.In post 1768, Garmr wrote:
Are you trying to argue that scum me did this on a slot i could of probably pushed to lynch at the time after I pushed to lynch masons day 1?In post 1767, Ruby Red wrote:are you trying to argue that people should be townreading a fake guilty- the worst
-
the worst Snuggly Duckling
- the worst
- Snuggly Duckling
- Snuggly Duckling
- Posts: 36602
- Joined: November 7, 2015
- Location: pond
throw me some quotes which made you feel this way?In post 1775, texcat wrote:Maybe it's just my biased point of view, but it sounded to me like he was bragging about getting the masons lynched.- Garmr
-
Garmr Survivor
- Garmr
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
I think it's obvious by now Texcat is scum you guys just have to actually look into things.
Her votes day 1 were on people that are easy to run a wagon a noob Sausade, were ill explained and shit "The worst" Or jumping or had a gathering their wagon (Iaminnoncent/gamma emerald) She then jumped on FAQ2 to push that wagon with a omgus reaction. So basically the easy wagons optimal for scum as she won't get backlash for them.
I'm going to argue the best move for scum was to jump off the wagon with the mason claim in the way she did.
Then she lays a vote on Rc
The main pusher of the wagon. She pushes for the person who's the loudest but come day 2In post 1234, texcat wrote:VOTE: Radiant Cowbells
I thought this was town, but I can't see town continuing the push to lynch claimed masons.
She pushes for the person who is second loudest (the louder you are the more likely a wagon to form) straight out the bat. Why avoid RC why go straight to me the answer is obvious.In post 1288, texcat wrote:FA_Q2 (7):RadiantCowbells, Skygazer, Havo, Completly Trustworthy, the worst, Garmr, Gamma Emerald
These people can't all be scum, but this is a good place to start.
VOTE: Garmr
She knew RC was the jail keeper/a power role and voting him would back fire on her. I propose the sudden shift in mentality for RC was the result of night actions which would could only come from scum. I think most likely a rolecop. It would explain why she wouldn't push Rc after that point. Also the worst seemed to notice it but couldn't piece together the final bits like I did.In post 1608, schadd_ wrote:RadiantCowbells has been killed in the night! he was aTown 3-shot Jailkeeper!
Also notice how she was off the wagon. The only interaction she has with it was casting doubt on it.In post 1291, the worst wrote:In post 1234, texcat wrote:VOTE: Radiant Cowbells
I thought this was town, but I can't see town continuing the push to lynch claimed masons.
????In post 1288, texcat wrote:FA_Q2 (7):RadiantCowbells, Skygazer, Havo, Completly Trustworthy, the worst, Garmr, Gamma Emerald
These people can't all be scum, but this is a good place to start.
VOTE: GarmrIn post 1493, texcat wrote:I'd like to hear from Wh4t before anyone hammers.
Wh4t (5):RadiantCowbells, Skygazer, the worst, Havo, Gamma Emerald
And I'm not likely to hammer when the wagon consists of the same people who lynched the masons.
Guys she's scum it obvious stop deluding yourself that she isn't.- texcat
-
texcat Mafia Scum
- texcat
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2728
- Joined: August 18, 2014
In post 1777, the worst wrote:
throw me some quotes which made you feel this way?In post 1775, texcat wrote:Maybe it's just my biased point of view, but it sounded to me like he was bragging about getting the masons lynched.
It was really just the one. And it's just that he's taking credit forIn post 1768, Garmr wrote:
Are you trying to argue that scum me did this on a slot i could of probably pushed to lynch at the time after I pushed to lynch masons day 1?In post 1767, Ruby Red wrote:are you trying to argue that people should be townreading a fake guiltypushing to lynchthe masons, not just voting the masons. He's arguing that he didn't need to fake a guilty on me to get lynched. He could have pushed me instead of the masons and gotten me lynched. I guess that where I sense that he's bragging. Like he thinks he's so good that whoever he pushed would be lynched. What doesn't make sense is that on one hand he says he didn't need to fake a guilty on me, and on the other hand, he did fake a guilty on me.
I already commented on this. This does not seem to be the normal town reaction to getting confirmed masons lynched. Compare it to RC's reaction.In post 1286, Garmr wrote:Welp I was wrong oh well no biggy.In post 1273, RadiantCowbells wrote:Hi I expect to be literally hated right now
RC feels bad and tries to explain where he went wrong. Garmr seems to be trying to preempt us thinking that he voted for the masons because he was scum, by saying that he was wrong. And has continued that.In post 1275, RadiantCowbells wrote:I have literally never, over the past 5 years I've been here, seen a mason mason interaction anything like this one. If anyone wants to dig through my history in search of that they are welcome to but I had every reason to believe masons wouldn't actually talk about being unable to sort one another and them doing so now amazes me and I couldn't really play around it. Sorry for being super wrong but I was just trying to win.
I'm not jailkeeper enabler if I have to say that, I just didn't want to die n1.
I realize some of this may be my confirmation bias. But the facts are thatIn post 1770, Garmr wrote: Yeah I lynched the masons never denied it doesn't make me scum just wrong at the time.Garmr is the only person who has been on the wrong side of both lynches.Not only did he push to lynch the masons, but he did not vote Wh4t, and looks to be subtly trying to defend Wh4t.In post 1402, Garmr wrote:What's the case on wh4t again?In post 1454, Garmr wrote:
I don't dislike the wh4t wagon I just don't understand why his being scumread I asked multiple times but got no answer.In post 1453, Completly Trustworthy wrote:Garmr, why do you dislike the Wh4t wagon and want to vote somewhere else? Can you say why you think GE is more suspicious or make a case for Wh4t being towny?- Garmr
-
Garmr Survivor
- Garmr
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
I' am questioning your ability to read. I never said I could of pushed you over masons. It was me saying do you think those two actions in a row come from scum. Also the reason I faked a guilty is because I wanted to and I wanted to do it before this game started (not on you in particular just I wanted to do it) in fact I was planning to do it on doubting thomas/krazy slot that would of backfired harder. Me mentioning it got me caught out.In post 1779, texcat wrote:In post 1777, the worst wrote:
throw me some quotes which made you feel this way?In post 1775, texcat wrote:Maybe it's just my biased point of view, but it sounded to me like he was bragging about getting the masons lynched.
It was really just the one. And it's just that he's taking credit forIn post 1768, Garmr wrote:
Are you trying to argue that scum me did this on a slot i could of probably pushed to lynch at the time after I pushed to lynch masons day 1?In post 1767, Ruby Red wrote:are you trying to argue that people should be townreading a fake guiltypushing to lynchthe masons, not just voting the masons. He's arguing that he didn't need to fake a guilty on me to get lynched.Like he thinks he's so good that whoever he pushed would be lynched. What doesn't make sense is that on one hand he says he didn't need to fake a guilty on me, and on the other hand, he did fake a guilty on me.He could have pushed me instead of the masons and gotten me lynched. I guess that where I sense that he's bragging.
I' was saying being wrong doesn't make me scum. But I will admit I have no remorse for lynching them. You argue town should feel guilty? If that's the case scum would know this and try to pretend to feel guilty as well. Besides that every individual is different and will have different reactions. Texcat a long time player I refuse to be believe she is this shallow and basic of a player.In post 1779, texcat wrote:
I already commented on this. This does not seem to be the normal town reaction to getting confirmed masons lynched. Compare it to RC's reaction.In post 1286, Garmr wrote:Welp I was wrong oh well no biggy.In post 1273, RadiantCowbells wrote:Hi I expect to be literally hated right now
RC feels bad and tries to explain where he went wrong. Garmr seems to be trying to preempt us thinking that he voted for the masons because he was scum, by saying that he was wrong. And has continued that.In post 1275, RadiantCowbells wrote:I have literally never, over the past 5 years I've been here, seen a mason mason interaction anything like this one. If anyone wants to dig through my history in search of that they are welcome to but I had every reason to believe masons wouldn't actually talk about being unable to sort one another and them doing so now amazes me and I couldn't really play around it. Sorry for being super wrong but I was just trying to win.
I'm not jailkeeper enabler if I have to say that, I just didn't want to die n1.In post 1770, Garmr wrote: Yeah I lynched the masons never denied it doesn't make me scum just wrong at the time.
I literally asked what the case was because I didn't understand I didn't defend it like you did. This seems extremely dishonest. Also bussing is a thing texcat.In post 1779, texcat wrote: I realize some of this may be my confirmation bias. But the facts are thatGarmr is the only person who has been on the wrong side of both lynches.Not only did he push to lynch the masons, but he did not vote Wh4t, and looks to be subtly trying to defend Wh4t.In post 1402, Garmr wrote:What's the case on wh4t again?In post 1454, Garmr wrote:
I don't dislike the wh4t wagon I just don't understand why his being scumread I asked multiple times but got no answer.In post 1453, Completly Trustworthy wrote:Garmr, why do you dislike the Wh4t wagon and want to vote somewhere else? Can you say why you think GE is more suspicious or make a case for Wh4t being towny?
So basically your case on me is I played bad till today and I have no remorse. Not really any real reason given why you scum read me?- Garmr
-
Garmr Survivor
- Garmr
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
Also would like to point out how Tex cat was pretty much coasting on my wagon till I pushed her. Instead of defending herself she ignores my points and pushes me with the weakest case bar doubting thomas's.
1.This means Texcat is reactionary.
2.She's fine with sitting back if the situation allows it. Which is why I waited a bit to post my case to see what she does while voting me. Spoiler it's coasting.
3.She is unable to anwser my case on her so she ignores it. This means my case is solid and she rather pretend it didn't exist.
4 Her case seems rushed and thrown together not well thought out. It's rather easy to pick apart even for a newbie.
5.She was comfortable with the situation we were in.- the worst
-
the worst Snuggly Duckling
- the worst
- Snuggly Duckling
- Snuggly Duckling
- Posts: 36602
- Joined: November 7, 2015
- Location: pond
VOTE: Garmr
will be super mad if Texy is scum- Garmr
-
Garmr Survivor
- Garmr
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
are you kidding me are you fucking stupid.
- Garmr
-
Garmr Survivor
- Garmr
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
- Garmr
-
Garmr Survivor
- Garmr
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
fucking trash gah
- Garmr
-
Garmr Survivor
- Garmr
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
- Havo
-
Havo Mafia Scum
- Havo
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2475
- Joined: April 6, 2017
- Location: Down South Jukin'
LolIn post 1786, Garmr wrote:VOTE: garmr
Fuck this i'm out i'm fuck you fuck this town we deserve to lose fuck everything- the worst
-
the worst Snuggly Duckling
- the worst
- Snuggly Duckling
- Snuggly Duckling
- Posts: 36602
- Joined: November 7, 2015
- Location: pond
- Skygazer
-
Skygazer anyFor My Next Guest
- Skygazer
any- For My Next Guest
- For My Next Guest
- Posts: 11700
- Joined: June 17, 2018
- Pronoun: any
- Location: Baltimore
- Skygazer
-
Skygazer anyFor My Next Guest
- Skygazer
any- For My Next Guest
- For My Next Guest
- Posts: 11700
- Joined: June 17, 2018
- Pronoun: any
- Location: Baltimore
but seriously garmr is likely town
like why aren't we lynching havo
and with two town slots likely to be modkilled that could both be townflips (CT is 85% town, HWS has like a 50% chance of flipping town imo) why are we just suddenly shifting to garmr here
ugh- the worst
-
the worst Snuggly Duckling
- the worst
- Snuggly Duckling
- Snuggly Duckling
- Posts: 36602
- Joined: November 7, 2015
- Location: pond
ohey good point
VOTE: Havo- the worst
-
the worst Snuggly Duckling
- the worst
- Snuggly Duckling
- Snuggly Duckling
- Posts: 36602
- Joined: November 7, 2015
- Location: pond
Garmr is full policy lust atm because jumping on a scum motivated lynchbaity wagon is gross and then he self voted and AtE'd hard- Gamma Emerald
-
Gamma Emerald AnySurvivor
- Gamma Emerald
Any- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 69101
- Joined: August 9, 2016
- Pronoun: Any
- Location: Hell on Earth (aka Texas)
- the worst
-
the worst Snuggly Duckling
- the worst
- Snuggly Duckling
- Snuggly Duckling
- Posts: 36602
- Joined: November 7, 2015
- Location: pond
fingers crossed CT is just a wolf LOL- Garmr
-
Garmr Survivor
- Garmr
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
So you calling yourself out then? Calmed down a bit through.In post 1792, the worst wrote:Garmr is full policy lust atm becausejumping on a scum motivated lynchbaity wagon is grossand then he self voted and AtE'd hard- Havo
-
Havo Mafia Scum
- Havo
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2475
- Joined: April 6, 2017
- Location: Down South Jukin'
Because I’m town.In post 1790, Skygazer wrote:but seriously garmr is likely town
like why aren't we lynching havo
and with two town slots likely to be modkilled that could both be townflips (CT is 85% town, HWS has like a 50% chance of flipping town imo) why are we just suddenly shifting to garmr here
ugh - Havo
- Garmr
- the worst
- Gamma Emerald
- the worst
- the worst
- Skygazer
- Skygazer
- the worst
- Havo
- Garmr
- Garmr
- Garmr
- Garmr
- the worst
- Garmr
- Garmr
- texcat
- Garmr
- the worst
- Garmr
- texcat