mini normal 2027: advice mafia (endgrame)
- Saudade
-
Saudade Survivor
- Saudade
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 11146
- Joined: February 12, 2018
- Wh4t
-
Wh4t Goon
- Wh4t
- FA_Q2
-
FA_Q2 Mafia Scum
- FA_Q2
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1731
- Joined: August 30, 2014
How so?In post 44, Completly Trustworthy wrote:I doubt Radiant Cowbells is lying,since claiming in an unusual way like this could cause investigative roles to come after him at night. If he is scum, then that would be really bad for him. I don't know whether or not he's pulling some type of gambit though, I've read through a few games of his and he was always someone difficult to read.
There is no cop in this game. By drawing any other investigative roles to him, he can waste N1 investigative actions as all he has to do is not be the one doing the targeting. If there is a jail keeper, he has effectively made that role useless - trying to force the jail keeper to a known target gives the scum a free hand. That does not even take into account if the scum has a tracker which would make the claim a disaster. He does not even take this into account with his claim making this feel like he is not coming at this from a town mindset. How does he know that scum does not have a tracker? Hell, most scum roles will have a large advantage knowing likely town targets. All and all, this is a shit claim. I cant even see this as a gambit as VT trying to draw the night kill as claiming JK enabler would be the worst claim to make as you are directly asking to be made unkillable and lessening the chance that you are the target.
Hell, the only thing you might possibly get from this claim is more WIFOM which is, again, bad for town - it is such a bullshit claim.
I think you are scum and are role fishing and/or trying to pull town night actions.In post 40, RadiantCowbells wrote:So... If you doubt the claim, what alignment do you think I am and why did I make the claim when I did?
I can not really think of a solid town reason to make this claim when you are under NO DURESS at all. You are not likely to be the night one target (1/10) of a chance with no claim at all if you really were the JK enabler.
VOTE: RadiantCowbells
Can anyone point to a prow town reason for this claim?
The only other read I have at this point is town for Completly Trustworthy. He basically pulled us out of RVS and is actively engaging people.- FA_Q2
-
FA_Q2 Mafia Scum
- FA_Q2
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1731
- Joined: August 30, 2014
Not sure what you expect from RVS. There was nothing scummy to go off at that point. RVS is always a shit show.In post 26, Wh4t wrote:
From what little I can discern so far garmr seems fine. FA and yourself have the most awkward entrances imo.In post 17, Completly Trustworthy wrote:Nice to see you again Skygazer.
Also, Wh4t, why did you change your vote?
What is a 'natural' entrance than. How is my 'reason' different than horrors vote on CT?- FA_Q2
-
FA_Q2 Mafia Scum
- FA_Q2
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1731
- Joined: August 30, 2014
1. Just do a search on me. Handing you links certainly is not optimal - then I would get to chose the games that you are looking at. Bad idea if I were scum.In post 80, Completly Trustworthy wrote:I Am Innocent, why don't you get the Saudade wagon? Both Havo and texcat explained their reasons for voting him in 75 and 71. Do you not agree with their reasoning? If so, then please explain why. As for me, I found Saudade's entrance very weird and would like to know why he felt the need to declare he was town right off the bat.
Now I have some questions to ask people
1. Please provide a link to completed games with you as scum and town
2. What do you believe is the optimal scumhunting strategy? What scumtells do you think are overrated?
3. How would you describe your playstyle as scum?
4. Do you enjoy being scum or town more?
My answers
1. I cannot provide links since I have only played one other game on this site and its ongoing
2. It's best to pay attention to what people have to say about others and whether their actions match up with their words. The ways in which players treat each other contains far more information than that which can be gained through observing the playstyles of individual players, which are all different and can be hard to read. Radiant Cowbells is an example of a player who is often mislynched due to acting really scummy(at least in the games I have read through.)
3. As scum, I try to get people who I think can be mislynched to create content which puts them further into trouble or allows me to present a case against them later. I always want a member of the town to be on the defensive, since that means little attention is paid to me. In addition, I try to post a lot, but prefer to avoid fluff. If I keep saying productive things or elaborate on my opinions, then eventually someone else will mess up naturally and I can capitalize on the opportunity.
4. I prefer being scum or third party the most because you are the active force in the game that everyone else is trying to stop, it is very fun to try to try and outwit all your competitors.
2. Don't think that there is an 'optimal' strat. Just engage people. The most overrated strat IMHO is meta. Meta is to easy to change and/or misinterpret. Another overrated strat here is activity. I find activity to tell very little if not combined with something more.
3. Considering that my goal has always been to play exactly the same (and I think that is most people's goal) so I would say the same. I think the only real difference in my scum game and my town game is that as scum I have to protect my team so my interactions will be fake with those players/less likely to engage with them.
4. I like scum WAY better. It is fun trying to deceive town. As town I feel like there is a lot of stabbing in the dark. Town is also far more likely so it is more like the 'average' role. Also, there is ALWAYS something scum can do - as a VT night phases are boring.- FA_Q2
-
FA_Q2 Mafia Scum
- FA_Q2
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1731
- Joined: August 30, 2014
An OMGUS vote?
This is bullshit. I can get behind a Saudade wagon once RC is sorted. That claim is to scummy to let stand.- FA_Q2
-
FA_Q2 Mafia Scum
- FA_Q2
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1731
- Joined: August 30, 2014
What is interesting is that you felt the need to comment on the wagon w/o taking a stance.In post 54, DoubtingThomas wrote:3 bote wagon already! How interesting!
Active lurking...- Wh4t
-
Wh4t Goon
- Wh4t
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 986
- Joined: August 10, 2017
- Location: NZ
FA have you played with RC before? He is almost always N1 NK or D1 mislynch. If the claim is legit then is it not optimal to claim it when you are someone who is very paranoid about being killed N1? You coming in with such certainty about the claim being false is slightly worrying. The JK doesn't have to protect him but he could and that WIFOM could be enough to keep RC from being targeted.
I disagree with your CT read completely, rushing out of RVS is not AI and in fact scum would most likely want to look proactive to get towncred. Most of his posts feel like posturing more than anything, like why would someone genuinely believe that players will post links to games for you instead of you doing the work yourself? It reads as LAMIST busy work to me.
So far IAI and CT are scumreads for me.
Null on pretty much everyone else but I want to believe RC is town.
VOTE: IAI- FA_Q2
-
FA_Q2 Mafia Scum
- FA_Q2
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1731
- Joined: August 30, 2014
Yes I have. I find him a pretty a chaotic player and generally he does play anti-town if I remember correctly - as well as wild ass claims. That was years ago though so my experience is pretty irrelevant. I doubt that his play is going to remain utterly constant over that time.In post 107, Wh4t wrote:FA have you played with RC before?
Again, what town mindset/goal comes from claiming that role. I cant think of a single pro town reason. If he pulled that role it would absolutely be anti-town to claim like that. Further, I cannot think of a town gambit (like drawing the NK) that would work with that claim.He is almost always N1 NK or D1 mislynch. If the claim is legit then is it not optimal to claim it when you are someone who is very paranoid about being killed N1? You coming in with such certainty about the claim being false is slightly worrying. The JK doesn't have to protect him but he could and that WIFOM could be enough to keep RC from being targeted.
Nothing of that claim comes from a town mindset IMHO. There is a LOT there that I can see coming from a scum mindset.
If all he did was move on from RVS then it would be totally neutral. What has he done that is posturing other than asking for links? Sure, asking for links is dumb and the other questions are pretty weak but questions generate content. Look at what we are doing now.I disagree with your CT read completely, rushing out of RVS is not AI and in fact scum would most likely want to look proactive to get towncred.
Most of his posts feel like posturing more than anything, like why would someone genuinely believe that players will post links to games for you instead of you doing the work yourself? It reads as LAMIST busy work to me.
You avoided my question to you and you seem to have only said things that you think make me scummy but then null read me. Why?So far IAI and CT are scumreads for me.
Null on pretty much everyone else but I want to believe RC is town.
VOTE: IAI- Garmr
-
Garmr Survivor
- Garmr
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
I think FAQ is reaching a bit. He can be put in a null-scum list. If I was going to place a vote anytime soon I would place a vote on this slot.
Was reading saude newbie games. He omgused in newbie 1883 as scum, difference through it was a threat to vote not like a actual vote in this game. Couldn't really find a town game where he reacted the same way but I saw he got mislynched. So not entirely sure what to make of the slot but will add to my watch list.
I am still a bit cautious around I am Innocent because of my gut, But no matter if he is scum or town he is actually his coherency is pretty good, still early game through.
Will say this I don't think RC's actions are scummy and pretty null.
I like wh4t they gives me the fuzzy town feelings.
P:edit will read faq2 recent post after posting.- Wh4t
-
Wh4t Goon
- Wh4t
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 986
- Joined: August 10, 2017
- Location: NZ
I can see how it's anti-town but I think you're getting confused with anti-town vs scum mindsets. How does him claiming what he has help scum? He hasn't asked for the JK to claim, so I'm not sure how he would achieve role-fishing with the claim, and also he would leave all other PRs free to use their role on his buddy as they would avoid using it on RC with his claim as he may be Jailkept.In post 108, FA_Q2 wrote:Nothing of that claim comes from a town mindset IMHO. There is a LOT there that I can see coming from a scum mindset.
I'm not trying to hard defend RC but I just don't see how pulling this gambit benefits scum. It actually doesn't benefit either alignment except maybe a very paranoid town!RC, who thinks he's keeping the JK active by claiming. From my recent experience with RC, this isn't as far fetched as scum!RC outing himself for no obvious benefit. I would prefer if we did the normal scum hunt thing today and if RC is still a main suspect after a few decent wagons then by all means, however the claim is not a scum claim in itself imo.
Following this I also townlean saudade for his joke-counterclaim entrance. I know it's been a few years for you but OMGUSing someone isn't really something that scum exclusively do now. Saudade reads carefree and arrogant in tone which is something I think scum would try to avoid in their posting, so as not to rub people the wrong way. IME scum try to stay under the radar and what RC and Saudade are doing isn't that lol.- Wh4t
-
Wh4t Goon
- Wh4t
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 986
- Joined: August 10, 2017
- Location: NZ
I said you had one of the two most awkward entrances to me. I'm not sure what you wanted me to answer? I avoided moving my vote from you until you reentered the thread and you appear to be pushing your scum reads which elevated you back to null and so I moved onto my next suspect.In post 108, FA_Q2 wrote:You avoided my question to you and you seem to have only said things that you think make me scummy but then null read me. Why?
I don't recall having said things about you being scummy otherwise?- FA_Q2
-
FA_Q2 Mafia Scum
- FA_Q2
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1731
- Joined: August 30, 2014
I want to know what was 'awkward' about it and what constitutes an entrance that would not be awkward.In post 111, Wh4t wrote:
I said you had one of the two most awkward entrances to me. I'm not sure what you wanted me to answer? I avoided moving my vote from you until you reentered the thread and you appear to be pushing your scum reads which elevated you back to null and so I moved onto my next suspect.In post 108, FA_Q2 wrote:You avoided my question to you and you seem to have only said things that you think make me scummy but then null read me. Why?
I don't recall having said things about you being scummy otherwise?- Wh4t
-
Wh4t Goon
- Wh4t
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 986
- Joined: August 10, 2017
- Location: NZ
As you said yourself, RVS is RVS so trying to find something that stands out I scanned the posts with my gut feel and your one stood out as trying too hard to be casual, so I pushed to find out. An entrance that would not be awkward would be one that just seems like a natural thing to post, not overly thought out or with some potential underlying agenda. How are these questions helping you?In post 112, FA_Q2 wrote:
I want to know what was 'awkward' about it and what constitutes an entrance that would not be awkward.In post 111, Wh4t wrote:
I said you had one of the two most awkward entrances to me. I'm not sure what you wanted me to answer? I avoided moving my vote from you until you reentered the thread and you appear to be pushing your scum reads which elevated you back to null and so I moved onto my next suspect.In post 108, FA_Q2 wrote:You avoided my question to you and you seem to have only said things that you think make me scummy but then null read me. Why?
I don't recall having said things about you being scummy otherwise?- RadiantCowbells
-
RadiantCowbells He/himSmooth Criminal
- RadiantCowbells
He/him- Smooth Criminal
- Smooth Criminal
- Posts: 70855
- Joined: February 24, 2013
- Pronoun: He/him
- Contact:
So you acknowledge I have a history of doing stuff you feel is wild/anti-town (your words: I disagree) and you vote me for doing something that's... wild/anti-townIn post 108, FA_Q2 wrote:
Yes I have. I find him a pretty a chaotic player and generally he does play anti-town if I remember correctly - as well as wild ass claims. That was years ago though so my experience is pretty irrelevant. I doubt that his play is going to remain utterly constant over that time.In post 107, Wh4t wrote:FA have you played with RC before?
Again, what town mindset/goal comes from claiming that role. I cant think of a single pro town reason. If he pulled that role it would absolutely be anti-town to claim like that. Further, I cannot think of a town gambit (like drawing the NK) that would work with that claim.He is almost always N1 NK or D1 mislynch. If the claim is legit then is it not optimal to claim it when you are someone who is very paranoid about being killed N1? You coming in with such certainty about the claim being false is slightly worrying. The JK doesn't have to protect him but he could and that WIFOM could be enough to keep RC from being targeted.
Nothing of that claim comes from a town mindset IMHO. There is a LOT there that I can see coming from a scum mindset.
If all he did was move on from RVS then it would be totally neutral. What has he done that is posturing other than asking for links? Sure, asking for links is dumb and the other questions are pretty weak but questions generate content. Look at what we are doing now.I disagree with your CT read completely, rushing out of RVS is not AI and in fact scum would most likely want to look proactive to get towncred.
Most of his posts feel like posturing more than anything, like why would someone genuinely believe that players will post links to games for you instead of you doing the work yourself? It reads as LAMIST busy work to me.
You avoided my question to you and you seem to have only said things that you think make me scummy but then null read me. Why?So far IAI and CT are scumreads for me.
Null on pretty much everyone else but I want to believe RC is town.
VOTE: IAI
I will eat the bullet tonight with incredible consistency, me not claiming would have been awful for town. This isn't even a gambit it's just the objectively correct play.2019 stats: Town WR 76.7%, overall WR 81.667%, 1 scum defeat involving a major mod error in lylo vs 8 scum wins.- RadiantCowbells
-
RadiantCowbells He/himSmooth Criminal
- RadiantCowbells
He/him- Smooth Criminal
- Smooth Criminal
- Posts: 70855
- Joined: February 24, 2013
- Pronoun: He/him
- Contact:
- RadiantCowbells
-
RadiantCowbells He/himSmooth Criminal
- RadiantCowbells
He/him- Smooth Criminal
- Smooth Criminal
- Posts: 70855
- Joined: February 24, 2013
- Pronoun: He/him
- Contact:
- RadiantCowbells
-
RadiantCowbells He/himSmooth Criminal
- RadiantCowbells
He/him- Smooth Criminal
- Smooth Criminal
- Posts: 70855
- Joined: February 24, 2013
- Pronoun: He/him
- Contact:
- Havo
-
Havo Mafia Scum
- Havo
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2475
- Joined: April 6, 2017
- Location: Down South Jukin'
What’s that? Play a game of mafia?In post 100, Saudade wrote:Are you 100% sure you want to do this mate?
Yeah, I signed up and everything.
Or do you mean vote you?
Well, you see, you posted something that doesn’t make sense to me. I pointed it out and voted you because of it. And instead of you discussing with me why I have an issue with it, you continue to dodge the specific topic. And imply I’m just bad at the game. IMO you’re coming off as quite defensive when you do this. Which just makes me think it’s more and more likely that you’re not town.
Now if you have any interest in me thinking you are town, thus on my team, I’d think you would want to at least discuss what you said and why you would say it. I believe mafia is a team game. So if you are town we need to work together, give and take, meet each other halfway kind of stuff. But of course if you don’t want to discuss it and want to continue to just imply I’m bad that’s fine too. But I’m more than happy at the moment with where my vote is.- Fredrick A Campbell
-
Fredrick A Campbell Fre/He/She/It/They/伊Mafia Scum
- Fredrick A Campbell
Fre/He/She/It/They/伊- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2278
- Joined: March 11, 2018
- Pronoun: Fre/He/She/It/They/伊
- RadiantCowbells
-
RadiantCowbells He/himSmooth Criminal
- RadiantCowbells
He/him- Smooth Criminal
- Smooth Criminal
- Posts: 70855
- Joined: February 24, 2013
- Pronoun: He/him
- Contact:
like it looks to an uninformed observer like i'm being the aggressive one but fa_q2 isn't stupid enough to sit there and say 'rc is doing rc things therefore rc is scum'
that vote is sheer i want to pick a fight with RC because his playstyle is annoying me right now and lord it over him that I'm arguing that his play isso stupidbecause obviously he only has1/10odds of flipping scum
i'm not going to bother dealing with it as passive aggressively or pretend to take the high ground, just wanna get rid of it2019 stats: Town WR 76.7%, overall WR 81.667%, 1 scum defeat involving a major mod error in lylo vs 8 scum wins.- Wh4t
-
Wh4t Goon
- Wh4t
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 986
- Joined: August 10, 2017
- Location: NZ
- DoubtingThomas
-
DoubtingThomas Mafia Scum
- DoubtingThomas
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2886
- Joined: July 13, 2018
I am not active lurking.. er.. wasn'tIn post 106, FA_Q2 wrote:
What is interesting is that you felt the need to comment on the wagon w/o taking a stance.In post 54, DoubtingThomas wrote:3 bote wagon already! How interesting!
Active lurking...
I was passive lurking, bro- DoubtingThomas
-
DoubtingThomas Mafia Scum
- DoubtingThomas
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2886
- Joined: July 13, 2018
What was wrong with my entrance?In post 61, I Am Innocent wrote:In post 60, Garmr wrote:This is pretty weak but "I am innocent." Doesn't give me a good gut feeling at the moment.
The same thing that doubting Thomas did, tho DT went way more overboard on it.In post 58, Wh4t wrote:
What was wrong with Texcat's entrance?In post 31, I Am Innocent wrote:
Don’t forget texcatIn post 26, Wh4t wrote:
From what little I can discern so far garmr seems fine. FA and yourself have the most awkward entrances imo.In post 17, Completly Trustworthy wrote:Nice to see you again Skygazer.
Also, Wh4t, why did you change your vote?
No problems with Saud’s entrance but am willing to vote DT at the moment.
Ps - garmr, why no vote then?
YOu know in another website I keep getting warning for being a dick so I was trying to be nice here
and then when I am nice somehow I am getting comments like I 'went way more overboard on it."
like how can i please the human race, right ha ha- DoubtingThomas
-
DoubtingThomas Mafia Scum
- DoubtingThomas
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2886
- Joined: July 13, 2018
In post 120, RadiantCowbells wrote:like it looks to an uninformed observer like i'm being the aggressive one but fa_q2 isn't stupid enough to sit there and say 'rc is doing rc things therefore rc is scum'
that vote is sheer i want to pick a fight with RC because his playstyle is annoying me right now and lord it over him that I'm arguing that his play isso stupidbecause obviously he only has1/10odds of flipping scum
i'm not going to bother dealing with it as passive aggressively or pretend to take the high ground, just wanna get rid of it
Hey, are you AKA vibrava? - DoubtingThomas
Copyright © MafiaScum. All rights reserved.
- DoubtingThomas
- DoubtingThomas
- Wh4t
- RadiantCowbells
- Fredrick A Campbell
- Havo
- RadiantCowbells
- RadiantCowbells
- RadiantCowbells
- RadiantCowbells
- Wh4t
- FA_Q2
- Wh4t
- Wh4t
- Garmr
- FA_Q2
- Wh4t
- FA_Q2
- FA_Q2
- FA_Q2
- FA_Q2
- FA_Q2
- Saudade