Other site meta, just a habit tbh.In post 66, Trekkie99 wrote:ThisIn post 62, texcat wrote:I'd still like Overkill to explain why he claimed, but I see no reason for him to prove his claim.
@pvturist why didn't you think vork was suggesting copy and paste?In post 77, PvtUrist wrote:I like your response, Overki11. How do you feel about singleton's posts so far? Especially his first post and #63+#64.
Upon reading my mind went to "post at exactly x time to confirm neighbor", I didn't even realise the "copypasta" portion of the text before someone pointed it out.In post 32, Vorkuta wrote:Out of curiosity- does town require proof that they're actually neighbors? Or do we take that at face value?
Idk- getting both of them to post some random copypasta at exactly HH:MM:SS to confirm that they have access to neighbor-exclusive chat?
No, only on the opening. It's my experimental scumtell of how scum starts the game, that they have nothing in mind and hence start by going of a topic in thread.In post 67, Springtrap wrote:You could have atleast have answered my question.In post 44, singletonking wrote:VOTE: SpringtrapIn post 21, Springtrap wrote:A neighborhood? Do they have day and nightchat or is it just during the day?
I don't like that he opened with a question regarding whatever's been discussed, rather than coming up with his own content.
Is everyone here expected to come up with something new on the spot and not contribute to something ongoing? That is a double standard otherwise. I think I will voice my concerns of something new when it comes, but considering I'm not online as often, that makes this difficult.
What is a habit? Claiming in your first post?In post 76, 0verki11 wrote:Other site meta, just a habit tbh.In post 66, Trekkie99 wrote:ThisIn post 62, texcat wrote:I'd still like Overkill to explain why he claimed, but I see no reason for him to prove his claim.
Its not a mason and dont have plans to use it really.
Just wanted to out it now rather than later so we can work out if its TvT ir TvS.
He said some random copypasta, so after his reaction and explaination I felt kind of dumb.In post 80, EGL wrote:@munch why did you apologize rather than point out vork said copypasta?
I dont claim my role in my first post as almost anything else.In post 83, texcat wrote:What is a habit? Claiming in your first post?In post 76, 0verki11 wrote:Other site meta, just a habit tbh.In post 66, Trekkie99 wrote:ThisIn post 62, texcat wrote:I'd still like Overkill to explain why he claimed, but I see no reason for him to prove his claim.
Its not a mason and dont have plans to use it really.
Just wanted to out it now rather than later so we can work out if its TvT ir TvS.
Did you even think about using it? Or think about how it could be used?
Howcan work out if its TvT? You are the one who has/had a chance to chat privately with Munch. Don't you think that might have given you some advantage in determining whether he's T or S?we
VOTE: Overkill
The only way your actions make sense to me is if you are scum.
I just can't agree with this. I agree, the way it was claimed was wierd to me, I would probably do it after discussing it in PT and with a "Hi", but I guess that's a matter of style and personality. But Overkill's explanation seems reasonable to me.In post 83, texcat wrote:What is a habit? Claiming in your first post?
Did you even think about using it? Or think about how it could be used?
How we can work out if its TvT? You are the one who has/had a chance to chat privately with Munch. Don't you think that might have given you some advantage in determining whether he's T or S?
VOTE: Overkill
The only way your actions make sense to me is if you are scum.
If it's this other site's meta to out it, wouldn't it just be NAIIn post 83, texcat wrote:What is a habit? Claiming in your first post?In post 76, 0verki11 wrote:Other site meta, just a habit tbh.In post 66, Trekkie99 wrote:ThisIn post 62, texcat wrote:I'd still like Overkill to explain why he claimed, but I see no reason for him to prove his claim.
Its not a mason and dont have plans to use it really.
Just wanted to out it now rather than later so we can work out if its TvT ir TvS.
Did you even think about using it? Or think about how it could be used?
Howcan work out if its TvT? You are the one who has/had a chance to chat privately with Munch. Don't you think that might have given you some advantage in determining whether he's T or S?we
VOTE: Overkill
The only way your actions make sense to me is if you are scum.
Hi Gamma
![:]](./images/smilies/icon_smiling.png "Cheerful Smile"){kind=icon}
I feel like this doesn't really track with your entranceIn post 36, Munchmellow wrote:In post 29, ofrhz wrote:What was your initial reaction in seeing 10?In post 23, Munchmellow wrote:No, no discussion.In post 20, ofrhz wrote:Did you guys discuss and agree to out your neighborhood together?I was really surprised.I guess there is logic behind it and overkill will explain it.
I'm having trouble parsing that first sentence. Can you explain again what habit it is? Or what the other site meta is?In post 86, 0verki11 wrote:I dont claim my role in my first post as almost anything else.In post 83, texcat wrote:What is a habit? Claiming in your first post?In post 76, 0verki11 wrote:Other site meta, just a habit tbh.In post 66, Trekkie99 wrote:ThisIn post 62, texcat wrote:I'd still like Overkill to explain why he claimed, but I see no reason for him to prove his claim.
Its not a mason and dont have plans to use it really.
Just wanted to out it now rather than later so we can work out if its TvT ir TvS.
Did you even think about using it? Or think about how it could be used?
Howcan work out if its TvT? You are the one who has/had a chance to chat privately with Munch. Don't you think that might have given you some advantage in determining whether he's T or S?we
VOTE: Overkill
The only way your actions make sense to me is if you are scum.
The chat is useless as I will discuss all thoughts here rather than in the chat.
And I highly doubt that Munch would act different in the PT than in the thread anyway.
A scum neighbor or just scum in general?In post 83, texcat wrote:The only way your actions make sense to me is if you are scum.
I don't think claiming was necessarily scummy. But I do think the way Overkill claimed was scummy. I do think him refusing to post in the hood is scummy. His total rejection of the hood and not discussing the claim with his neighbor is scummy. It's like he's scum and trying to post as little as possible.In post 87, Munchmellow wrote:I just can't agree with this. I agree, the way it was claimed was wierd to me, I would probably do it after discussing it in PT and with a "Hi", but I guess that's a matter of style and personality. But Overkill's explanation seems reasonable to me.In post 83, texcat wrote:What is a habit? Claiming in your first post?
Did you even think about using it? Or think about how it could be used?
How we can work out if its TvT? You are the one who has/had a chance to chat privately with Munch. Don't you think that might have given you some advantage in determining whether he's T or S?
VOTE: Overkill
The only way your actions make sense to me is if you are scum.
I don't see how it is bad for town, that it was claimed and claimed early. I think you give way too much credit to this neighborhood thing. I mean, even wiki states that for inexpirienced players it's virtually useless. So I think best for town is, if they know at least one of us is town. The adventage we have and possibility of chating/interogating each other is not lost with town knowing.
Probably don’t try thisIn post 32, Vorkuta wrote:Out of curiosity- does town require proof that they're actually neighbors? Or do we take that at face value?
Idk- getting both of them to post some random copypasta at exactly HH:MM:SS to confirm that they have access to neighbor-exclusive chat?
No that’s a valid reaction.In post 37, PvtUrist wrote:Overly defensive. Not the best first impression here, Munch.In post 36, Munchmellow wrote:Are you suggesting we should copy paste sth from our private thread, because that would be clearly against the rules.
Shade noted
Can you think of actual scum motivation for those actions or do they just look scummy?In post 93, texcat wrote:I don't think claiming was necessarily scummy. But I do think the way Overkill claimed was scummy. I do think him refusing to post in the hood is scummy. His total rejection of the hood and not discussing the claim with his neighbor is scummy. It's like he's scum and trying to post as little as possible.In post 87, Munchmellow wrote:I just can't agree with this. I agree, the way it was claimed was wierd to me, I would probably do it after discussing it in PT and with a "Hi", but I guess that's a matter of style and personality. But Overkill's explanation seems reasonable to me.In post 83, texcat wrote:What is a habit? Claiming in your first post?
Did you even think about using it? Or think about how it could be used?
How we can work out if its TvT? You are the one who has/had a chance to chat privately with Munch. Don't you think that might have given you some advantage in determining whether he's T or S?
VOTE: Overkill
The only way your actions make sense to me is if you are scum.
I don't see how it is bad for town, that it was claimed and claimed early. I think you give way too much credit to this neighborhood thing. I mean, even wiki states that for inexpirienced players it's virtually useless. So I think best for town is, if they know at least one of us is town. The adventage we have and possibility of chating/interogating each other is not lost with town knowing.
To be fair, this is urist regardless of whether he's town or scum.In post 96, Gamma Emerald wrote:Shade noted
