In post 5, geraintm wrote:hello all, think half of us have just come from my last game.
not going to straight up claim vanilla townie in my first post this time.......
Inclined to agree with myself here. I mean, I usually am, but I really am here.
In post 20, T3 wrote:By the way, I think I should claim here. I'm an Informed Miller.
In post 30, T3 wrote:I was informed there is a macho 2-shot cop.
Good to know. Did we already have the discussion on Millers not living to LimLo? Because that's sure as hell my policy on these things.
In post 24, excallq wrote:I am posting because it will look suspicious if I don't.
I mean hello everyone.
In post 37, Rannygazoo wrote: In post 28, Roden wrote: In post 20, T3 wrote:By the way, I think I should claim here. I'm an Informed Miller.
This is only my second game, so I had to look up what this is. Interesting role tbh. I guess the only way to verify this would be if a Gunsmith checked you?
Also, I'm assuming you need to save this information for later. Otherwise you'd just tell us.
UNVOTE: T3
VOTE: Rannygazoo since he voted for an (alleged) Informed Miller.
Bold of you to assume I read RVS
VOTE: excallq
Uh. Huh.
In post 66, Roden wrote:Anyone else have opinions on Ranny's posts? I don't really feel good about them. Claiming not to read RVS posts but then noticing me vote him feels off.
In post 67, Rannygazoo wrote:On the contrary, if you think about it for a moment, I think you’ll agree that it makes sense to pay more attention to the stuff that’s posted after my first post.
In post 68, Roden wrote:That's true for any alignment lol. It's the fact that you said you weren't paying attention even though you clearly were is what feels off to me.
In post 69, T3 wrote:I lowkey don't like ramy or rodens shading of each other.
This is "a mood, tbh" as the kids say
In post 85, cw357 wrote:hi; I just got here (have been travelling)
post 24 makes excallq look very suspicious
ill do RQS in a few hours when i have computer accessability
Of all the things in the 80 posts prior this is a weird thing to make sure you comment on while also saying you're too busy to even start shitposting yet
DGB's relatively quiet early. Not oddly so. Fits what I remember of them as town. We're in concordance w/r/t T3, which is NAI since Miller lims are easy townpoints.
In post 112, Jake The Wolfie wrote: In post 110, DrippingGoofball wrote: In post 92, Rannygazoo wrote:Setup analysis time
@DGB you’re pretty old. Does ‘miller who was informed that there’s a macho 2-shot cop’ make sense from a balance perspective?
Lately, mods like to distribute roles to screw the town so setup speculation cannot be trusted. Nor is any kind of claim.
I don't think this answered their question.
DrippingGoofball wrote:VOTE: T3
Having said that, we should torch that slot and never look back. Let's not deal with this rubbish.
What's wrong with Terminator 3?
The goof-to-content ration in this slot is way too high right now. Like, Snoop Dogg in Jamaica eating nonna's special brownies too high. Is me saying that hypocritical? Yes. Is that going to stop me? No.
Anyway they finally put up something that is actually playing the game (albeit highly disagree with it) shortly after so w/e.
In post 117, T3 wrote:
That's antitown.
I don't think dgb doing this is ai but I can't say why.
I'm like 99% sure this game wasn't in RVS when this post was made and I don't like it. (the post).
There's a whole clusterfuck of shit here (End of P5, P6) about DGB's "lim all millers" stance and I'm not here for it. Millers don't endgame, full stop. DGB wittering on about mod-fuckery is a little
ehhhh
though.
In post 127, Jake The Wolfie wrote: In post 126, T3 wrote:Flipping me doesn't tell us the alignment of the cop.
I would find it very odd that the Mafia would have a Cop on their side, unless there is a traitor in the game.
If the cop does turn out to be Mafia-aligned, then that would point strongly to a vigilante in the game.
But all of this is IIOA, so I'll leave setup spec to someone else.
In post 143, Jake The Wolfie wrote: In post 142, Roden wrote: In post 141, Jake The Wolfie wrote:all of this is pointless dribble, but more importantly you haven't justified why we should execute T3. Your attempt at justification is akin to "Well we should kill them to make sure they aren't lying.", as if that is a good strategy.
This is more or less my issue with it. Thing is, idk if DGB actually is scum here because it just seems too blatant and risky. Like, what does scum get out of doing this? I just don't understand the logic here.
I think this was a failed attempt to get a free exe on a townie.
In post 145, Jake The Wolfie wrote: In post 144, Roden wrote:Possibly yeah. But it's just wild to think somebody's scum gameplan would be "Vote this person out because I said so." And then execute the plan in the scummiest way possible. Like, I don't see how they could possibly think the rest of us would just listen to them and do as they say. Granted, I don't see it as a town mindset either. Maybe I'm just overthinking it and DGB really did just make a blatantly scummy play and hoped for the best.
I could totally see DGB here being a traitor role and hoping that the Mafia pick up on it.
I could totally see DGB here being a traitor role and hoping that the Mafia pick up on it.
I'll leave setup spec to someone else.
I already used a bruh image once this post so I'll refrain. Just imagine another, even better bruh moment.jpg here. I like neither of these two slots so far.
In post 149, T3 wrote: In post 145, Jake The Wolfie wrote: In post 144, Roden wrote:Possibly yeah. But it's just wild to think somebody's scum gameplan would be "Vote this person out because I said so." And then execute the plan in the scummiest way possible. Like, I don't see how they could possibly think the rest of us would just listen to them and do as they say. Granted, I don't see it as a town mindset either. Maybe I'm just overthinking it and DGB really did just make a blatantly scummy play and hoped for the best.
I could totally see DGB here being a traitor role and hoping that the Mafia pick up on it.
I think in every single normal I've completed except the Datisi doctor one had traitors, so that would make sense.
Aw man, and I already used the what monkey.jpg too. Say it with me kids:
Past performance is no guarantee of future results
. Am I inclined to believe T3's claim, yes. Is this still shit-ass awful logic? Also yes.
End of page 8, nascent wagon on excallq appears. Prior me and geraint of Rivia are right: yeeting people who are gonna be replaced is stupid and anti-town as shit. Then again, seeing who replaced into that slot... not much of value was lost.
Roden's posting on P9 re: still trying to push "DGB as traitor" and then creating associatives that are backwards at best is real off for me. Only redeeming feature is that presumably scum!Rodan is smart enough to understand they're not going to get chain MLs if the first link in the chain fails, and wouldn't actually go through with yeeting DGB if they're the
droids
traitor they're looking for. Christ, now you've even got me talking about traitors. Stop traitor speccing, just hunt scum FFS. End of P9 Roden going REAL hard on this traitor bullshit. Real solid scumvibes. Gonna be awkward if I get to page 18 and they out themselves as a cop or something.
In post 252, Roden wrote:I wasn't trying to cause drama tbh. I pushed on something that pinged me and felt better on keeping it up when I got pushed back on it.
I don't think the Traitor thing is guaranteed, and I don't want to tunnel on it. It's why I keep asking for what others think. What about it is bleh to you?
Then why the flying dutchman have you been pushing on DGB and going on about them being a traitor for the last 4 pag (Editor's Note: KidAmn had a minor aneurism. He'll be back shortly after these messages.)
In post 265, Titus wrote: In post 252, Roden wrote: In post 246, Titus wrote: In post 242, Roden wrote: In post 241, Titus wrote:VOTE: Roden
Who do you think is the best vote to shake things up?
If the question is for me, I've already laid down my vote. DGB, if not a Traitor, is still coming off very anti-town, and they're not doing anything to change that. And I wasn't the one to suggest it in the first place either, since their actions were confusing me until the possibility of them being a Traitor came up.
I didn't ask vote to eliminate. I asked for your vote if you were causing drama for drama's sake to get reads.
This traitor thing is bleh.
I wasn't trying to cause drama tbh. I pushed on something that pinged me and felt better on keeping it up when I got pushed back on it.
I don't think the Traitor thing is guaranteed, and I don't want to tunnel on it. It's why I keep asking for what others think. What about it is bleh to you?
You don't want to tunnel on it but you keep bringing focus on it. Here's a way to not tunnel on it, stop talking about it. Traitor comments waste time unless one flips.
THANK YOU