In post 656, MalcolmTucker wrote: In post 592, Eiralox wrote: In post 589, FancyPants wrote:
I
did
say that if you are town I don't mind eliminating you anyway, because I find your posts too confusing, and your thought process impenetrable - so we're never going to be able to effectively work together.
yeah again i'm right "Fancy is confused so want Eira dead." what a farce. In what world do you wanna elim an active player who's forming reads and getting things going over Mala, whose done jack squat, or Loft, who's vapid air?
I'm not feeling good about your reasoning here Pants. You're nearing my scumleans.
Just catching up but I don't like this post at all. Inactive/quiet players should not be given a free ride but simply being active and posting a lot is not a valid argument for avoiding suspicion: good mafia players can win by being active and either choking the gamestate or trying to drive it in a direction beneficial to them.
tru. i coulda phrased that better. my feeling then was that theres scummier stuff than CW's case on me going on so Fancy Pants having problems with my playstyle and being willing to me at -1 mainly for that doesnt look good either way you cut it.
since starting Loftwing dive i feel way better about Fancy pants from a single post. Fred i'm liking for the mala vote and their overall interaction for me.
im continuing loftwing iso, there's scummy vibes, will expoand when can. can also see town! loftwing tho, arguments both ways. right now my thinking is i'm going to vote MalaKittens.
This shift from Loft for one simple reason: I don't like llowel being on Loft. from one post lowell doesnt look good to me at all, and here i add that they were my first gut scum read this game.