![Laughing :lol:](./images/smilies/icon_lol2.gif)
~Nancy
Deadly.In post 43, biancospino wrote: Try to get it play tic-tac-toe. Spoiler: it's a complete dumbass at playing games.
Just to be clear, is that serious?
In post 45, Nancy Drew 39 wrote:Hectic is in this game?In post 39, Porkens wrote:Page 1 Analysis
Based on the information given, it is difficult to determine who the most likely mafia is, as there is limited information about each player's behavior and motives. However, one player that might be mafia is Doctor Drew, as some players (such as Hectic and Titus) are expressing concern about their behavior. Additionally, Doctor Drew has shown an interest in tunneling Nancy Drew 39 and "obligated to tunnel your other half," which could indicate that they are trying to target Nancy for elimination.
FoS: Doctor Drew
Well like duh, thank you Captain obvious wrt to the bolded but since we don’t have crystal balls here, we have nothing but their posts to go on.In post 41, biancospino wrote: So Drew is Mafia 'cause of his sig, got'im.
Page 1 Analysis WITHOUT SIGS:
Spoiler: prompt
It is difficult to definitively determine the alignments of these players based on the information given. The posts contain a mix of humor, strategy talk, and personal interactions, making it challenging to make an accurate assessment. However, some players appear to be targeting others, such as Doctor Drew's focus on Defective Agency, while others seem to be working together, like Porkens's focus on working with the Town to uncover the Mafia.
It is important to keep in mind that in games of Mafia, players often feign being one alignment while actually being the opposite, in order to mislead other players and avoid suspicion. So, it's possible that some players' true alignments may be different from what their posts suggest.
Our robotic overload has spoken, Porkens locktown, eyes on Drew.
Maybe I’m dumb but can you please explain to me how chat gp can find mafia?In post 50, Porkens wrote: The post by BloodB0t and biancospino suggest that they are skeptical of ChatGPT's ability to play the game of Mafia and do not take it seriously. They are seemingly trying to discredit ChatGPT's abilities and cast doubt on its ability to be an effective player in the game.
However, it is important to keep in mind that in games of Mafia, players often feign being one alignment while actually being the opposite, in order to mislead other players and avoid suspicion. So, it's possible that BloodB0t and biancospino are trying to mislead other players into thinking that ChatGPT is not a threat. It's also possible that they are working together to protect Doctor Drew, and are trying to discredit ChatGPT as a defense mechanism.
Without more information and context, it is difficult to determine the true motivations of BloodB0t and biancospino and their potential alignments in the game.
I actually don't know what you're on about.In post 70, biancospino wrote: @Dei, I'm sure Glance knows why.
There is a specific thing he did that relates to a past game in a certain way.
Also, are you doublevoters?
We're gonna have to be the serious hydra thenIn post 72, Dei Ex Machina wrote:I townread her. Now, please accept this OMGUS vote as a token of my heartfelt appreciation.
VOTE: Dei Ex Machina
- Nyx
Just a wonky pool table I'm afraid.In post 75, Dei Ex Machina wrote:There's suspicion in hydra chat that, but I can't say I agree with it. I don't have any reads yet as there's been no real content, but I bet ChatGPT does, so let me consult it!youmight be keeping bodies in the basement
Spoiler: ChatGPT
Also pagetop!
- Nyx
I don't see anything to be particularly intense about so far, although I will say that I'm confident in my first scumread (imaginality)In post 77, Dei Ex Machina wrote: Janus is suspicious of how chill you are, he says that's a scumtell for you.
- Nyx
-Mr. GlanceIn post 78, Defective Agency wrote:I don't see anything to be particularly intense about so far, although I will say that I'm confident in my first scumread (imaginality)In post 77, Dei Ex Machina wrote: Janus is suspicious of how chill you are, he says that's a scumtell for you.
- Nyx
What in the actual fuck are you guys up to?In post 72, Dei Ex Machina wrote:I townread her. Now, please accept this OMGUS vote as a token of my heartfelt appreciation.
VOTE: Dei Ex Machina
- Nyx
Hydras are fine but I don’t care much for hydra shenanigans. In LOST, Off the Hook kept doing this weird thing where both heads would come into the thread multiple times to say they were being bullied by the other head. Mr. Glance thinks it could just be harmless joking but I’m more suss.In post 84, Doctor Drew wrote:Oh now you see the issue with hydras lol.In post 83, Defective Agency wrote:What in the actual fuck are you guys up to?In post 72, Dei Ex Machina wrote:I townread her. Now, please accept this OMGUS vote as a token of my heartfelt appreciation.
VOTE: Dei Ex Machina
- Nyx
~The REAL Drew
You are becoming more Drew as we speak.
Getting a few bad vibes from the three headed monster.
Too serious too early on, and copying Porkens' gimmick (as have other users tbf but I townread bianco and BloodBot was fairly readable last game with them)
I'd bet money on bianco being town - they seem really awkward as scum from experience, and more natural as townIn post 90, Doctor Drew wrote:On the flip side here, you already have someone you could call a town read?In post 89, Defective Agency wrote:Too serious too early on, and copying Porkens' gimmick (as have other users tbf but I townread bianco and BloodBot was fairly readable last game with them)
Mr. Glance
@Imaginality, I have been in a hydra in 3 games I played with you and I don’t recall you ever mentioning anything about hydras before?In post 145, BloodB0t wrote:How so? Right now I don't feel imaginality has done much that is AI.In post 136, Defective Agency wrote: 1) imaginality's response to us is +++scum.
+scum. In my experience town are more enthusiastic about a burgeoning wagon on a 'nullread'.In post 177, Dei Ex Machina wrote:Kitty? Towny? He hasn't said anything new, his only reads were basically parroting thread consensus.In post 136, Defective Agency wrote: 1) imaginality's response to us is +++scum.
2) Menalque's talk of 'correct' play being voting Porkens and 'boring' is quite strange, and possibly +scum.
3) KittyTacky seems towny so far.
4) Morning Tweet, why did you vote Bloodbot recently? It didn't look related to the post.
-Mr. Glance
I need to look more into imaginalitybut for now I'm actually going to VOTE: KittyTacky.
P-edit: Exactly.
-Mr. GIn post 180, Defective Agency wrote:+scum. In my experience town are more enthusiastic about a burgeoning wagon on a 'nullread'.In post 177, Dei Ex Machina wrote:Kitty? Towny? He hasn't said anything new, his only reads were basically parroting thread consensus.In post 136, Defective Agency wrote: 1) imaginality's response to us is +++scum.
2) Menalque's talk of 'correct' play being voting Porkens and 'boring' is quite strange, and possibly +scum.
3) KittyTacky seems towny so far.
4) Morning Tweet, why did you vote Bloodbot recently? It didn't look related to the post.
-Mr. Glance
I need to look more into imaginalitybut for now I'm actually going to VOTE: KittyTacky.
P-edit: Exactly.
In post 174, narrow parking wrote:theoretically speaking there should be no such hard limit on the memory of GPT, since it uses a transformer model blah blah blah. the ~4000 token limit is simply the maximum prompt length for computational/speed processes.In post 123, KittyTacky wrote:IMPORTANT: it has a "memory" of 4000-ish tokns (i.e words). So it will see only the last few pages at best.In post 53, biancospino wrote: It probably can't, but it's funny to ask it and see what it conjures up.
You can just dump the whole thread as a prompt and ask it to pass a judgment, it may need some poking to get it to say anything other than "not enough information" thou.
This contribution feels +scum.In post 176, narrow parking wrote:this is lazy hunting imo what makes it --EV townIn post 127, KittyTacky wrote: Porkens' gimmick is mildly anti-town imo, particularly if they keep it up after earlygame. I think it's only slightly scummy at this point tho.
bianco is town imo, on vibes.
Thanks Dr. DIn post 184, Doctor Drew wrote: I believe Porkens said in the signup thread they would be using ChatGPT, so the fact they are using it is NAI. I will say I find it a bit annoying, but I don't believe I ever played with them so it is not like I can read them one way or another.
I have to look back on the one game I played with Morning, because I do get a smidge of protecting Porkens here though, even though I do agree with what she is saying(ya I know, on the surface seems hypocritical). I guess more of a tone read. Like, she kinda posted more than she needed to just to say 'chatgpt is NAI'
But, I also will give a benefit of the doubt to those in my sig.
I do really like Mr. G for town now.
And Nyx, all is good with the color thing. I was the dumbass who lacked reading comprehension lol, I understand what you were doing now.
Just checked Titus and no evidence that she’s lurking. Doesn’t of course mean that’s impossible but this game is the last thread she’s posted in.In post 328, BloodB0t wrote: I was more coming at it just wanting to hear more about imaginality, my read on him was/is still null. I've only given your posts a cursory glance btw.
I mean I do suspect Titus but there's not much to go on. It does fit with your theory of lurkscums.
This game deserves a bit more of my attention and I might do a whole readthrough by the end of the day, if not then I will tomorrow. atm I kinda scumread DEM too but this is a very lazy take, subject to change. Kinda suprised nobody has voted Menalque either but yeah I don't have much more to offer right now.
@Titus, you were in that game and it was relatively recent.In post 340, Titus wrote:In post 298, Defective Agency wrote: Porkens is town. Unsure on Mo and Menalque so far
Grandpa go and read this game for some scum!Porkens
-Furtive G. Lance
No. Not doing meta. Sorry. Too tired in one game.
It's not an acronym. It means enemy, like opponent
I particularly find Imaginality’s Titus’ read interesting, consider she’s been hard defending him. My take is that I’m not a fan of how hard Titus has been pushing Porkens.In post 317, KittyTacky wrote:Please explain your reads. In particular I want the scumleans as those are generally more useful for scumhunting ime.In post 260, imaginality wrote:
Town leans:
Doctor Drew, Dei Ex Machina, Bloodb0t
Menalque
Porkens
Neutral/mixed reads:
biancospino, Morning Tweet
Need more info:
GrandpaMo
Everyone really (no one has done anything super obvscum or obvtown yet)
Scum leans:
narrow parking
KittyTacky
Titus
Defective Agency
My issue @Titus is your main reasoning for being opposed to Imaginality wagon was you implying he’s often miselimbait but yet you’re practically deathtunnelling Porkens who’s also frequently miselimbait. So yes, I think the double standard accusation here is apt.In post 354, Titus wrote:In post 353, Doctor Drew wrote: You vaguely say the Imaginalty wagon will lead to people doing stupid shit.
You don't say it because you believe they are town, but also don't offer up even a tiny bit of explanation to hate the wagon besides 'hey go look over there or something'.
And then when I have an an issue with this double standard, you redirect the heat to me?
I didn't vaguely said it. I outright said it. That is explanation. I know he gets picked on as town. Does that make him town? No. So I didn't say that. I just don't give a shit for easy.
There is no double standard. One is a comparison of meta. The other is fact.
Is this still accurate? Can you see how your scumread on us looks reactive?In post 260, imaginality wrote:
Town leans:
Doctor Drew, Dei Ex Machina, Bloodb0t
Menalque
Porkens
Neutral/mixed reads:
biancospino, Morning Tweet
Need more info:
GrandpaMo
Everyone really (no one has done anything super obvscum or obvtown yet)
Scum leans:
narrow parking
KittyTacky
Titus
Defective Agency
You know I prefer to talk scumreads. Speaking of, let's see if we can wagon...In post 503, Dei Ex Machina wrote:I echo this / think this is a good pointIn post 484, Doctor Drew wrote:Tbh, unless he is jedi mind tricking me, he seems a bit similar to how I play sometimes as town.In post 483, Defective Agency wrote:Is this still accurate? Can you see how your scumread on us looks reactive?In post 260, imaginality wrote:
Town leans:
Doctor Drew, Dei Ex Machina, Bloodb0t
Menalque
Porkens
Neutral/mixed reads:
biancospino, Morning Tweet
Need more info:
GrandpaMo
Everyone really (no one has done anything super obvscum or obvtown yet)
Scum leans:
narrow parking
KittyTacky
Titus
Defective Agency
Like when someone puts a case on you for bullshit reasons you tend to OMGUS a bit(not saying your reasons are bullshit per se, but from their perspective).
A basic point, but a good point still
Semi-related, could you pick a townread you haven't explained yet and explain it, Mr Glance?
-Morta
narrow parking existsIn post 516, Titus wrote:Fairish. I am at idgaf. Let's go after scummy people.In post 476, imaginality wrote: I don't especially like how GrandpaMo was "at the end of today I'm gonna tell you stuff that town NEED to know" and then more recently "oh it's nothing important not a big deal" but I don't think there's any value in pressing on it now.
Re. my Titus read I feel like she might be soft defending me maybe partly to get me on side and also to set up a "told you so, listen to me instead of going for easy wagons" to have more sway on future days when I flip town if I get limmed.
She feels different this game to the last I was in with her (where she was town) but that could be due to various factors (our roles that game, the fact she was sparring with Mathblade in particular, out of game stuff) so I don't place enough weight on the difference to make a meta case. It just feels less reassuring than it would if she felt the same tonewise.
I'm townreading the Doc. Baffled that you're so tunnelled already as to be pre-flipping every other player based on a scumread.In post 519, Titus wrote:Convince me he's possible partnered with Drew. I don't see it based on recent posting unless the "not yet" post is a post meant for a PT which is stretch even if they are partners.In post 518, Defective Agency wrote:narrow parking existsIn post 516, Titus wrote:Fairish. I am at idgaf. Let's go after scummy people.In post 476, imaginality wrote: I don't especially like how GrandpaMo was "at the end of today I'm gonna tell you stuff that town NEED to know" and then more recently "oh it's nothing important not a big deal" but I don't think there's any value in pressing on it now.
Re. my Titus read I feel like she might be soft defending me maybe partly to get me on side and also to set up a "told you so, listen to me instead of going for easy wagons" to have more sway on future days when I flip town if I get limmed.
She feels different this game to the last I was in with her (where she was town) but that could be due to various factors (our roles that game, the fact she was sparring with Mathblade in particular, out of game stuff) so I don't place enough weight on the difference to make a meta case. It just feels less reassuring than it would if she felt the same tonewise.
-Mr. Glance