Not phone posting this morning and actually catching up.
In post 2381, drealmerz7 wrote:
the 1 head has disappeared, and it reads to me like "oops I'm getting more SR and leaving us open to criticism than postie so I'm just stay hushed" - whereas a towny doesn't worry about that because all they should be trying to do is bring ideas to the table for discussion
I understand your previous two points, but isn't this line of reasoning similar to what got fitz lynched? Not that it was the actual reason, but that's what pinged people in the first place and made them look at the slot with a scum-tinted view?
In post 2397, Titus wrote: In post 2396, drealmerz7 wrote:
I'm Queen Mary of Orange
and I'm a mason
Great, then your mason partner (if real) can vouch for you. Otherwise, I am not unvoting.
WHAT?!?! No, no, no. Any PR should be moved off of L-1 so a derphammer doesn't come in. What doesn't add up even more is your later posts where you say you want the partner to claim, yet by leaving your vote there you leave the opportunity for a hammer to happen before that.
In post 2399, Titus wrote:
Shaddowez vote is pretty bad.
You're at least the second person to say that about by Wraith vote (not including Wraith himself) without giving any reasons. So, why is it bad?
In post 2407, Wraith wrote:
Why are we unvoting before his Mason partner claims?
This smells like dreal claiming Mason to cover for a scum bus that was already on the wagon.
Now you're just parroting Titus, with the same terrible reasons.
In post 2408, Titus wrote:
Pretty sure I've read something wrong here as the procedure for when scum fake a mason is to force the scum buddy to vouch. Yet, a counterwagon comes up on me for actually putting the worst slot in the game to his claim.
Actually, I'm pretty sure you have the worst slot in the game. CK should have been lynched yesterday.
In post 2415, Commander Shepard wrote:
@Wraith it is for the same reason I take yours seriously
Fake claiming mason while I am set up for lynching shop is horrendous.
I agree with CS here. I've seen a game where scum fake claimed mason, but it was much earlier in the game.
In post 2422, Wraith wrote:
Like as far as I'm concerned the short list for his partner is down to these people:
Tea and Biscuits
It's probably not Titus because he pushed for the claim. It's not me because I say so and I've already claimed. It's probably not Infinity because he's already claimed Miller. It's probably not Shepard because he's claimed it's not him, but he could just be lying, though I think he's town and being truthful.
In post 2424, Commander Shepard wrote:
Let's not narrow down the likely partner and make things easier for scum.
This. This. This. Either you're scum (likely), or you're just doing all the work for them. Regardless of what scum is or isn't already doing, how does putting this info out there help town in any way?
In post 2441, Titus wrote: In post 2439, Commander Shepard wrote: In post 2437, Wraith wrote: In post 2431, Commander Shepard wrote:
The procedure is NEVER for the other mason to claim wtf.
AFAIK this is when the claim is unprompted.
We pressured drealmerz into making the claim. We should not give him a pass without confirmation, that would defeat the purpose of forcing a claim under pressure IMO.
THEY ALREADY HAVE A BETTER TARGET IN ME TONIGHT
WHY WOULD THEY SHOOT THE CLAIMED MASON OVER THE CLAIMED BODYGUARD?!
This is why you do not claim the other partner.
One mason and one BG.
Mason is better to kill than BG.
Yes we did and fakeclaiming mason = suicide.
There is no way I am lynching Drealmerz.
In LYLO -1 if Drealmerz still alive then mason buddy claim not before.
The partner claims, wraith bgs partner scum are forced to shoot drealmerz.
If you believe the mason claim at all, why would you have the bg say which partner they are going to target? You're making less and less sense.
In post 2465, Titus wrote: In post 2461, drealmerz7 wrote: In post 2457, Wraith wrote:
... I think I could lynch AC.
why AC? if my claim is to be believed, AC researched my claim and unvoted me basedon the sense of the flavor
why wouldn't they stay on me and hope a hammer comes before a partner claim?
wraith+titus looking more and more suspect
Dude, if they have a scum pm, they know you are honest in this setup and don't want to be seen pushing you.
Those of us who don't know you are town need your partner to claim. There's only one person I feel fits your bill based on things you've both said and I haven't read the game.
In post 2497, Commander Shepard wrote: In post 2492, Titus wrote: In post 2491, Wraith wrote:
I think I'm most infuriated now than ever before that I got fucking Roleblocked by town. TWC was the obvtown townie to ever town and their insights would be such a stabilizing force right now.
I can't believe you idiots have 180'd so drastically based solely off an unverified Mason claim
Well yeah, they'd say to go through this process. That's why any competent scumteam kills them.
Competent scumteam leaves BG claim alone.
Doesn't even block it.
Because for the sheer reason if BG isn't dead policy in LYLO.
I disagree with this, but I feel any discussion here gives ideas to the scum team depending on what roles they may have.
In post 2503, Titus wrote: In post 2501, Commander Shepard wrote: In post 2499, Titus wrote: In post 2496, drealmerz7 wrote:
that's why you don't play scummy as BG
you should be LAMIST as BG
Nah, BGs play as scummy people.
BGs want to take bullets that otherwise go at obvtown.
Nope town as possible to try to take a bullet so they don't have to wifom.
Wtf is this. Titus you know better.
There isn't wifom. A competent BG lets people know whom they are guarding. Then the slot is conftown if the BG flips.
....I don't even know what to say. That slot is in no way conftown if the BG has claimed and flips. That's a perfect scenario for
I want Wraith tomorrow, especially if Titus flips scum. I'll have to reread T&B and Empking, because I imagine the third scum will be in there.