Mini 1939 - Organization XIII (Game Over)

II Xigbar · Post Post #1475 (ISO) » Tue Sep 12, 2017 8:57 pm

Yes, no case. Mafia has deprived me of enough sleep. Bed. I have the vast majority of my day free tomorrow.

VII Saix · Post Post #1476 (ISO) » Tue Sep 12, 2017 9:16 pm

In post 1474, II Xigbar wrote:We share 2/3 of our scumreads. Why don't you get past the fact that you feel the urge to policy lynch me and instead direct your energy at lynching Vexscum?

Vex, not yet. Lynch Axel with me. At best he is a VT now that he has used his power (so he says).

XI Marluxia · Post Post #1477 (ISO) » Tue Sep 12, 2017 11:53 pm

In post 1321, II Xigbar wrote:Yes they're both scum so why did you unvote one of them

If you bring the fire and get a Vexen wagon back, you have my scythe. If you don't, I'll be protecting my town reads in the best way I have available to me - supporting wagons that aren't completely terrible.

XI Marluxia · Post Post #1478 (ISO) » Tue Sep 12, 2017 11:59 pm

In post 1427, VI Zexion wrote:you voted Demyx with reasoning that may or may not be good, if you're town and Demyx is scum and Marluxia is scum then she hopped on for the bus at basically the exact moment you'd expect.

Your argument seems to be that Luxord should understand your suspicion of his vote because my vote came after his and didn't have reasoning behind it and could or could not be a bus. I wouldn't be convinced by that argument, although I don't really know what "being convinced" looks like when presented with an argument like this one.

I Xemnas · Post Post #1479 (ISO) » Wed Sep 13, 2017 12:58 am

In post 1474, II Xigbar wrote:We share 2/3 of our scumreads. Why don't you get past the fact that you feel the urge to policy lynch me and instead direct your energy at lynching Vexscum?

Who are you addressing?

I feel like this is addressed to me but it doesn't make sense if it is.

V Lexaeus · Post Post #1480 (ISO) » Wed Sep 13, 2017 4:25 am

In post 1476, VII Saix wrote:
In post 1474, II Xigbar wrote:We share 2/3 of our scumreads. Why don't you get past the fact that you feel the urge to policy lynch me and instead direct your energy at lynching Vexscum?
Vex, not yet. Lynch Axel with me. At best he is a VT now that he has used his power (so he says).

You're really still on about this?

The night skip literally had AXEL'S FACE ALL OVER IT

What's ONE good reason to doubt that he's the one who used it? Just one

V Lexaeus · Post Post #1481 (ISO) » Wed Sep 13, 2017 4:29 am

In post 1445, VII Saix wrote:
In post 1370, I Xemnas wrote:
Saix' behavior toward my predecessor is one approach scum sometimes take - denigrate, isolate and demotivate. Town frustrated with a disengaged IC looks different, from what I've seen.

What is a scum to gain from doing that to a confirmed town?
Your slot was already demotivated and isolated without me having to do anything. I may have denigrated them a bit to shake them out of the slumber. I was the only one hankering them to wake the fuck up. They didn't. So, they got replaced.

In what universe does "Go back to hibernating" mean "wake the fuck up?"

Scum has plenty to gain from doing that to conftown, such as silencing them or fostering distrust.
You can't lynch him, but you can still limit his usefulness to Town

V Lexaeus · Post Post #1482 (ISO) » Wed Sep 13, 2017 4:30 am

Can someone remind me again why Saix is still alive?

V Lexaeus · Post Post #1483 (ISO) » Wed Sep 13, 2017 4:31 am

In post 1422, X Luxord wrote:Nah I'm fucking tired of how I act in mafia games.
If I'm already ruining the game it's only going to get worse.
Sorry for shitting up your game Anti.
I'm not going to let it happen again.

Nonsense, you're not ruining anything!
At least not from my perspective

I Xemnas · Post Post #1484 (ISO) » Wed Sep 13, 2017 5:21 am

In post 1481, V Lexaeus wrote:
In post 1445, VII Saix wrote:
In post 1370, I Xemnas wrote:
Saix' behavior toward my predecessor is one approach scum sometimes take - denigrate, isolate and demotivate. Town frustrated with a disengaged IC looks different, from what I've seen.

What is a scum to gain from doing that to a confirmed town?
Your slot was already demotivated and isolated without me having to do anything. I may have denigrated them a bit to shake them out of the slumber. I was the only one hankering them to wake the fuck up. They didn't. So, they got replaced.
In what universe does "Go back to hibernating" mean "wake the fuck up?"

Scum has plenty to gain from doing that to conftown, such as silencing them or fostering distrust.
You can't lynch him, but you can still limit his usefulness to Town

Nice, original line of attack you have there.

Heartless · Post Post #1485 (ISO) » Wed Sep 13, 2017 5:28 am

Vote Count 2.9

Xigbar [2] - Saïx, Xaldin
Vexen [1] - Xigbar
Saïx [5] - Lexaeus, Vexen, Axel, Demyx, Zexion
Demyx [2] - Roxas, Marluxia
Xigbar [1] - Luxord
Luxord [1] - Xemnas

Not Voting: No one

6 to lynch
Deadline: (expired on 2017-09-18 02:19:22).[/color]

X Luxord · Post Post #1486 (ISO) » Wed Sep 13, 2017 5:30 am

Shouldn't Saix be dead right now if everyone is hated?

X Luxord · Post Post #1487 (ISO) » Wed Sep 13, 2017 5:31 am

In post 1480, V Lexaeus wrote:The night skip literally had AXEL'S FACE ALL OVER IT

What's ONE good reason to doubt that he's the one who used it? Just one

I believe the implication is that Xig doesn't think Axel's power makes him town.

I Xemnas · Post Post #1488 (ISO) » Wed Sep 13, 2017 5:35 am

In post 1486, X Luxord wrote:Shouldn't Saix be dead right now if everyone is hated?

6 to lynch with 12 alive is hated.

I don't like this wagon.

Heartless · Post Post #1489 (ISO) » Wed Sep 13, 2017 5:36 am

In post 1486, X Luxord wrote:Shouldn't Saix be dead right now if everyone is hated?

As 12 are currently alive, it would usually take 7 votes to lynch. The "6 to lynch" already takes into account the global hated modifier. :3

I Xemnas · Post Post #1490 (ISO) » Wed Sep 13, 2017 5:36 am

VOTE: Vexen

X Luxord · Post Post #1491 (ISO) » Wed Sep 13, 2017 5:40 am

dumb me dumb

IX Demyx · Post Post #1492 (ISO) » Wed Sep 13, 2017 6:01 am

Bad vote is bad vote

I Xemnas · Post Post #1493 (ISO) » Wed Sep 13, 2017 6:07 am

In post 1492, IX Demyx wrote:Bad vote is bad vote

Feeling's mutual.

VII Saix · Post Post #1494 (ISO) » Wed Sep 13, 2017 6:10 am

I am claiming.

IX Demyx · Post Post #1495 (ISO) » Wed Sep 13, 2017 6:20 am

In post 1493, I Xemnas wrote:
In post 1492, IX Demyx wrote:Bad vote is bad vote
Feeling's mutual.

We got on wrong foot, hi my name is demyx.
Let's lynch scum together!

I Xemnas · Post Post #1496 (ISO) » Wed Sep 13, 2017 6:24 am

In post 1495, IX Demyx wrote:
In post 1493, I Xemnas wrote:
In post 1492, IX Demyx wrote:Bad vote is bad vote
Feeling's mutual.
We got on wrong foot, hi my name is demyx.
Let's lynch scum together!

Do we have mutual scumreads?

V Lexaeus · Post Post #1497 (ISO) » Wed Sep 13, 2017 10:09 am

In post 1484, I Xemnas wrote:
In post 1481, V Lexaeus wrote:
In post 1445, VII Saix wrote:
In post 1370, I Xemnas wrote:
Saix' behavior toward my predecessor is one approach scum sometimes take - denigrate, isolate and demotivate. Town frustrated with a disengaged IC looks different, from what I've seen.

What is a scum to gain from doing that to a confirmed town?
Your slot was already demotivated and isolated without me having to do anything. I may have denigrated them a bit to shake them out of the slumber. I was the only one hankering them to wake the fuck up. They didn't. So, they got replaced.
In what universe does "Go back to hibernating" mean "wake the fuck up?"

Scum has plenty to gain from doing that to conftown, such as silencing them or fostering distrust.
You can't lynch him, but you can still limit his usefulness to Town
Nice, original line of attack you have there.

Yeah, it is actually, considering I brought it up several pages ago but you just ignored it so you could handwave it away now.

V Lexaeus · Post Post #1498 (ISO) » Wed Sep 13, 2017 10:16 am

In post 1487, X Luxord wrote:
In post 1480, V Lexaeus wrote:The night skip literally had AXEL'S FACE ALL OVER IT

What's ONE good reason to doubt that he's the one who used it? Just one
I believe the implication is that Xig doesn't think Axel's power makes him town.

Xigbar, yes.

Saix is actually trying to say Axel's not the one who did it for some bullshit reason.

V Lexaeus · Post Post #1499 (ISO) » Wed Sep 13, 2017 10:18 am

In post 1488, I Xemnas wrote:
In post 1486, X Luxord wrote:Shouldn't Saix be dead right now if everyone is hated?
6 to lynch with 12 alive is hated.

I don't like this wagon.

What don't you like about it?

It's been hovering around four/five pretty much all day, so it's not like it just came out of nowhere.